Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Last Acts argues that the Elizabethan and Jacobean theater offered playwrights, actors, and audiences important opportunities to practice arts of dying. Psychoanalytic and new historicist scholars have exhaustively documented the methods that early modern dramatic texts and performances use to memorialize the dead, at times even asserting that theater itself constitutes a form of mourning. But early modern plays also engage with devotional traditions that understand death less as an occasion for suffering or grief than as an action to be performed, well or badly.Active deaths belie narratives of helplessness and loss through which mortality is too often read and instead suggest how marginalized and constrained subjects might participate in the political, social, and economic management of life. Some early modern strategies for dying resonate with descriptions of politicized biological life in the recent work of Giorgio Agamben and Roberto Esposito, or with ecclesiastical forms. Yet the art of dying is not solely a discipline imposed upon recalcitrant subjects. Since it offers suffering individuals a way to enact their deaths on their own terms, it discloses both political and dramatic action in their most minimal manifestations. Rather than mournfully marking what we cannot recover, the practice of dying reveals what we can do, even in death. By analyzing representations of dying in plays by Marlowe, Shakespeare, and Jonson, alongside devotional texts and contemporary biopolitical theory, Last Acts shows how theater reflects, enables, and contests the politicization of life and death.

Theater --- Death in literature. --- English drama --- History --- History and criticism. --- Ars moriendi. --- Ben Jonson. --- Christopher Marlowe. --- Death. --- Giorgio Agamben. --- Renaissance Drama. --- Robert Esposito. --- William Shakespeare. --- biopolitics.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

It is a common belief that scripture has no place in modern, secular politics. Graham Hammill challenges this notion in The Mosaic Constitution, arguing that Moses's constitution of Israel, which created people bound by the rule of law, was central to early modern writings about government and state. Hammill shows how political writers from Machiavelli to Spinoza drew on Mosaic narrative to imagine constitutional forms of government. At the same time, literary writers like Christopher Marlowe, Michael Drayton, and John Milton turned to Hebrew scripture to probe such fundamental divisions as those between populace and multitude, citizenship and race, and obedience and individual choice. As these writers used biblical narrative to fuse politics with the creative resources of language, Mosaic narrative also gave them a means for exploring divine authority as a product of literary imagination. The first book to place Hebrew scripture at the cutting edge of seventeenth-century literary and political innovation, The Mosaic Constitution offers a fresh perspective on political theology and the relations between literary representation and the founding of political communities.

Religion and politics. --- Political science --- English literature --- History. --- History and criticism. --- machiavelli, milton, spinoza, christopher marlowe, michael drayton, politics, political science, theology, religion, imagination, spirituality, christianity, secularism, moses, israel, jewish state, law, government, populace, multitude, citizen, citizenry, common good, citizenship, race, obedience, choice, free will, agency, sovereignty, divine authority, community, plague, marvell, poetry, literature, nonfiction, harrington, tolerance.