Listing 1 - 10 of 13 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This paper explores the relationship between the constitutional entrenchment of central bank independence and inflation performance. Empirical studies for developing countries have not found a relationship between central bank independence, proxied by the "de jure" independence established in the central bank law, and inflation. We argue that the constitution is likely to be better enforced than ordinary statutes owing to its higher legal rank. Our empirical analysis finds that in a sample of Latin American and Caribbean countries, those countries that entrench the independence of the central bank in the constitution have a better inflation performance.
Banks and Banking --- Inflation --- Macroeconomics --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Banking --- Central bank autonomy --- Central bank legislation --- Central bank accountability --- Central banks --- Prices --- Central bank mandate --- Price stabilization --- Banks and banking --- El Salvador
Choose an application
This paper extends the analysis of central bank independence to a model in which there is more than one policymaker. It shows that the degree of central bank independence as generally defined in the existing theoretical literature is only one of the influences on macroeconomic performance. The objectives of the fiscal authority, the commitment mechanisms available to the authorities and the nature of the policy game play a key role in determining the inflation rate and output in the economy. Furthermore, the model can be solved for the optimal degree of inflation aversion of the central bank. , a Working Paper and the authors) would welcome any comments on the present text Citations should refer to a Working Paper of the International Monetary Fund, mentioning the authors), and the date of issuance. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Fund.
Banks and Banking --- Inflation --- Public Finance --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Banking --- Macroeconomics --- Public finance & taxation --- Central bank autonomy --- Expenditure --- Central bank organization --- Prices --- Central banks --- Central bank mandate --- Banks and banking --- Expenditures, Public --- New Zealand
Choose an application
This document provides guidance and practical suggestions for conducting reviews of the Central Bank Transparency Code (CBT) to IMF staff and experts conducting reviews, as well as to the central banks participating or intending to participate in the CBT review.
Banking --- Banks and Banking --- Central bank management --- Central bank mandate --- Central bank transparency --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Central banks --- Economics --- Finance --- Finance: General --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial sector stability --- Financial services industry --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Monetary economics --- Monetary Policy --- Monetary policy --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Political Economy --- Political economy
Choose an application
This paper discusses key legal issues in the design of Board Oversight in central banks. Central banks are complex and sophisticated organizations that are challenging to manage. While most economic literature focuses on decision-making in the context of monetary policy formulation, this paper focuses on the Board oversight of central banks—a central feature of sound governance. This form of oversight is the decision-making responsibility through which an internal body of the central bank—the Oversight Board—ensures that the central bank is well-managed. First, the paper will contextualize the role of Board oversight into the broader legal structure for central bank governance by considering this form of oversight as one of the core decision-making responsibilities of central banks. Secondly, the paper will focus on a number of important legal design issues for Board Oversight, by contrasting the current practices of the IMF membership’s 174 central banks with staff’s advisory practice developed over the past 50 years.
Banks and Banking --- Public Finance --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Banking --- Public finance & taxation --- Financial services law & regulation --- Central bank legislation --- Legal support in revenue administration --- Central bank governance --- Bank supervision --- Central banks --- Revenue administration --- Central bank organization --- Central bank mandate --- Banks and banking --- Revenue --- State supervision --- United Kingdom
Choose an application
This paper discusses key legal issues in the design of Board Oversight in central banks. Central banks are complex and sophisticated organizations that are challenging to manage. While most economic literature focuses on decision-making in the context of monetary policy formulation, this paper focuses on the Board oversight of central banks—a central feature of sound governance. This form of oversight is the decision-making responsibility through which an internal body of the central bank—the Oversight Board—ensures that the central bank is well-managed. First, the paper will contextualize the role of Board oversight into the broader legal structure for central bank governance by considering this form of oversight as one of the core decision-making responsibilities of central banks. Secondly, the paper will focus on a number of important legal design issues for Board Oversight, by contrasting the current practices of the IMF membership’s 174 central banks with staff’s advisory practice developed over the past 50 years.
United Kingdom --- Banks and Banking --- Public Finance --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Banking --- Public finance & taxation --- Financial services law & regulation --- Central bank legislation --- Legal support in revenue administration --- Central bank governance --- Bank supervision --- Central banks --- Revenue administration --- Central bank organization --- Central bank mandate --- Banks and banking --- Revenue --- State supervision
Choose an application
This paper constructs a new index for measuring de jure central bank independence, the first entirely new index in three decades. The index draws on a comprehensive dataset from the IMF’s Central Bank Legislation Database (CBLD) and Monetary Operations and Instruments Database (MOID) and weightings derived from a survey of 87 respondents, mostly consisting of central bank governors and general counsels. It improves upon existing indices including the Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (CWN) index, which has been the de facto standard for measuring central bank independence since 1992, as well as recent extensions by Garriga (2016) and Romelli (2022). For example, it includes areas absent from the CWN index, such as board composition, financial independence, and budgetary independence. It treats dimensions such as the status of the chief executive as composite metrics to prevent overstating the independence of statutory schemes. It distills ten key metrics, simplifying current frameworks that now include upwards of forty distinct variables. And it replaces the subjective weighting systems relied on in the existing literature with an empirically grounded alternative. This paper presents the key features of the new index; a companion, forthcoming paper will provide detailed findings by country/region, income level, and exchange rate regime.
Banking --- Banks and Banking --- Central bank autonomy --- Central bank legislation --- Central bank mandate --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Central banks --- Currency crises --- Currency --- Deflation --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Economics --- Economics: General --- Exchange rate arrangements --- Foreign Exchange --- Foreign exchange --- Government policy --- Inflation --- Informal sector --- Macroeconomics --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: Other --- Price Level --- Price stabilization --- Prices
Choose an application
This paper sets out general principles for the design of financial stability frameworks, starting from an analysis of the objectives and tools of financial regulation. The paper then offers a comprehensive analysis of the costs and benefits of the two main models that have emerged for modern financial systems: the integrated model, with a single supervisor outside of the central bank, and the twin-peaks model, with a systemic risk regulator (central bank) on the one hand and a conduct of business regulator on the other. The paper concludes that the twin-peaks model may become more attractive when regulatory structures are geared more explicitly towards the mitigation of systemic risk-including through the introduction of new macroprudential tools that could be used alongside monetary policy to contain macro-systemic risks; through enhanced regulation and special resolution regimes for systemically important institutions; and a more holistic approach to the oversight of clearing and settlement systems. Since the optimal solution may well be path-dependent and specific to the development of financial markets in any given country, a number of hybrid models are also discussed.
Business & Economics --- Economic Theory --- Economic stabilization. --- Banks and banking, Central. --- Banker's banks --- Banks, Central --- Central banking --- Central banks --- Adjustment, Economic --- Business stabilization --- Economic adjustment --- Stabilization, Economic --- Banks and banking --- Economic policy --- Banks and Banking --- Finance: General --- Financial Risk Management --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Financial Crises --- Banking --- Finance --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Systemic risk --- Financial sector stability --- Central bank mandate --- Special resolution regime --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial crises --- Financial risk management --- Financial services industry --- Crisis management --- United States
Choose an application
Drawing on the 2016 update of the IMF’s Central Bank Legislation Database, this paper examines differences in central bank legal frameworks before and after the Global Financial Crisis. Examples from select countries show that many central bank laws have undergone changes in objectives, decision-making, accountability, and data collection. A wider cross-country survey illustrates the common occurrence of price stability in central bank objectives, and varying practices in defining financial stability, “independence” versus “autonomy,” and who within a central bank determines monetary policy. The highlighted facts illustrate the uses of the database and could be a starting point for further analyses.
Banks and banking, Central. --- Banker's banks --- Banks, Central --- Central banking --- Central banks --- Banks and banking --- Banks and banking, Central --- E-books --- Banks and Banking --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Price Level --- Inflation --- Deflation --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Banking --- Finance --- Public finance & taxation --- Financial sector stability --- Central bank legislation --- Price stabilization --- Legal support in revenue administration --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Prices --- Revenue administration --- Central bank mandate --- Financial services industry --- Government policy --- Revenue --- Russian Federation
Choose an application
The paper briefs the Executive Board on the initial considerations on CBDC. These cover a framework to guide countries’ CBDC exploration, as well as implications for monetary policy transmission, capital flow management measures, and financial inclusion.
Banking --- Banks and Banking --- Central Bank digital currencies --- Central bank mandate --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Central banks --- Clearinghouses --- Distributed ledgers --- Economics --- Finance --- Finance: General --- Financial inclusion --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Financial markets --- Financial services industry --- Government and the Monetary System --- Industries: Financial Services --- Monetary base --- Monetary economics --- Monetary Policy --- Monetary policy --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Monetary Systems --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Money supply --- Money --- Payment Systems --- Payment systems --- Political Economy --- Political economy --- Regimes --- Standards --- Technological innovations --- Technology
Choose an application
The finances of central banks is a topic of renewed interest: many central banks are posting significant losses due to the cost of monetary policy, over which central banks have no control. Conversely, operational expenses, over which the central banks have more control, is a subject of less attention. We use public income statement data from central banks to calculate a score for operational expense efficiency based on a stochastic frontier analysis. In addition, we offer potential explanations for the observed variations in efficiency levels across central banks. Our analysis reveals significant heterogeneity across countries and income groups. Central banks with a single objective demonstrate higher efficiency compared with those with multiple objectives. Regarding the output of price stability, central banks in low-income developing countries exhibit lower efficiency compared with central banks in emerging markets and advanced economies. Factors such as central bank independence, the depth of the financial system, and the degree of openness play a role in influencing efficiency levels. Our findings underscore the significance of well-defined objectives, the operating environment, and concentration on core activities in reducing inefficiency.
Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Banking --- Banks and Banking --- Central bank autonomy --- Central bank mandate --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Central banks --- Currency crises --- Deflation --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth --- Economics of specific sectors --- Economics --- Economics: General --- Emerging and frontier financial markets --- Finance --- Finance: General --- Financial markets --- Financial services industry --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Government policy --- Income --- Inflation --- Informal sector --- Macroeconomics --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- National accounts --- Price Level --- Price stabilization --- Prices --- Trade: General
Listing 1 - 10 of 13 | << page >> |
Sort by
|