Listing 1 - 10 of 204 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Information processing --- Information processing --- legislation. --- legislation --- Case law --- Case law --- Credoc --- Belgium --- Belgium --- Credoc
Choose an application
Case law. --- Implementation. --- Legal principles. --- Legal proceedings. --- Sanctions. --- Europe.
Choose an application
"Erdélyi jogélet [Transylvanian Legal Life] a journal founded in 2019 by the Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Institute of Law as the successor to the Transylvanian Law Gazette (1907-1918) of [the city of] Cluj-Napoca and the Transylvanian Legal Life (1942-1944) of [the city of Târgu Mureş" (About the journal page, English version).
legal history --- jurisprudence --- comparative law --- romania --- hungary --- case-law --- Law --- Droit --- Romania. --- Law.
Choose an application
Since 2009 two courts have been shaping human rights of asylum seekers in Europe: the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Side by side, the courts examined who is protected from refoulement, when and how asylum seekers can be detained and what remedies they should have access to. Did they seek convergence in their asylum case-law or paid no attention to each other’s jurisprudence? Did they establish a coherent standard of the asylum seekers’ protection in Europe? Judicial dialogue between the ECtHR and CJEU in the area of asylum is at the heart of this study. The book offers also a comprehensive overview of the asylum case-law of the two courts and identifies the main convergences and divergences in their approach to protection against refoulement, immigration detention and effective remedies.
asylum seeker. --- Court of Justice of the European Union. --- European Court of Human Rights. --- case law (EU) --- comparative law. --- removal. --- migration control. --- illegal migration.
Choose an application
Since 2009 two courts have been shaping human rights of asylum seekers in Europe: the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Side by side, the courts examined who is protected from refoulement, when and how asylum seekers can be detained and what remedies they should have access to. Did they seek convergence in their asylum case-law or paid no attention to each other’s jurisprudence? Did they establish a coherent standard of the asylum seekers’ protection in Europe? Judicial dialogue between the ECtHR and CJEU in the area of asylum is at the heart of this study. The book offers also a comprehensive overview of the asylum case-law of the two courts and identifies the main convergences and divergences in their approach to protection against refoulement, immigration detention and effective remedies.
asylum seeker. --- Court of Justice of the European Union. --- European Court of Human Rights. --- case law (EU) --- comparative law. --- removal. --- migration control. --- illegal migration.
Choose an application
Stare decisis --- Judge-made law --- -Judge-made law --- -Case law --- Judicial law --- Judicial legislation --- Law, Judge-made --- Common law --- Judicial power --- Judicial process --- Lacunae in law --- Law --- Legislation --- Legislative power --- Precedents (Law) --- Judgments --- Legal certainty --- Res judicata --- Interpretation and construction --- -Stare decisis --- Case law
Choose an application
BPB1307 --- Jurisprudence --- Cour constitutionnelle --- cásdlí --- sodna praksa --- судска пракса --- case-law --- giurisprudenza --- jurisprudență --- съдебна практика --- судска практика --- każistika --- jurisprudência --- soudcovské právo --- Rechtsprechung --- prípadové právo --- pretsedendiõigus --- retspraksis --- jurisprudentie --- νομολογία --- orzecznictwo --- praktikë gjyqësore --- sudska praksa --- esetjog --- rättspraxis --- teismų praktika --- oikeuskäytäntö --- jurisprudencia --- tiesu prakse --- teismų teisė --- case law --- преседан --- precedents --- ítélkezési gyakorlat --- jurisprudencija --- Grondwettelijk Hof
Choose an application
Les textes de base sont enrichis de notes historiques, de renvois et de références de jurisprudence, ce qui fait de ce Code un outil indispensable pour une approche plus approfondie de la matière. Nous avons par ailleurs cherché à préserver la précision des textes en ajoutant les réglementations régionales, les conventions internationales, les lois particulières, les dispositions transitoires et les arrêtés royaux habituellement joints au Code civil. Le Livre 2, Titre 3 (entré en vigueur le 1er juillet 2022), le Livre 3 (1er septembre 2021), le Livre 4 (1er juillet 2022) et le Livre 8 (1er novembre 2020) figurent dans le Code de même que les Livres 1 et 5 (dont l’entrée en vigueur est fixée au 1er janvier 2023). L’intégration du droit futur et des variantes régionales rend la lecture du Code civil de plus en plus malaisée, mais il s’agit, nous semble-t-il, du prix à payer pour une appréhension complète de la matière. (Source: Larcier)
Civil law --- Droit civil --- Codes. --- Codes --- jurisprudentie --- droit civil --- Belgique --- cásdlí --- sodna praksa --- судска пракса --- case-law --- giurisprudenza --- jurisprudență --- съдебна практика --- судска практика --- każistika --- jurisprudência --- soudcovské právo --- Rechtsprechung --- prípadové právo --- pretsedendiõigus --- jurisprudence --- retspraksis --- νομολογία --- orzecznictwo --- praktikë gjyqësore --- sudska praksa --- esetjog --- rättspraxis --- teismų praktika --- oikeuskäytäntö --- jurisprudencia --- tiesu prakse --- teismų teisė --- case law --- преседан --- precedents --- ítélkezési gyakorlat --- jurisprudencija --- Yearbooks
Choose an application
This volume contains the general report and the national reports on the subject “Precedent and the Law”, which were submitted to the world congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law held in Utrecht in 2006. Precedent is often considered a major distinction mark between the civil law and the common law. But is this still the case ? In common law jurisdictions the sharp edges of “stare decisis” seem to water down, whereas civil law jurisdictions now do admit that precedents - at least de facto - constitute a source of law. Convergence, however, would be too strong a word to characterise these tendencies. These reports throw light on this issue.
Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Stare decisis --- Congresses --- Congrès --- 342.56 --- Rechterlijke macht --- Conferences - Meetings --- 342.56 Rechterlijke macht --- Congrès --- Droit comparé --- Sources du droit --- Case law --- Académie internationale de droit comparé --- Common law --- Précédent --- Jurisprudence
Choose an application
#RBIB:gift.2005 --- Theses --- Judge-made law --- Judicial opinions --- Opinions, Judicial --- Legal opinions --- Case law --- Judicial law --- Judicial legislation --- Law, Judge-made --- Common law --- Judicial power --- Judicial process --- Lacunae in law --- Law --- Legislation --- Legislative power --- Interpretation and construction
Listing 1 - 10 of 204 | << page >> |
Sort by
|