Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Police discretion --- Admonition --- Decriminalization --- Acquittals --- Décriminalisation --- Décriminalisation --- Police discretion - France --- Police discretion - Québec (Province) --- Police discretion - Great Britain

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Why do corporations obey the law? When companies violate the law, what kinds of interventions are most apt to correct their behavior and return them to compliant status? In this book Sally Simpson examines whether the shift towards the use of criminal law, with its emphasis on punishment and stigmatization, is an effective strategy for controlling illegal corporate behavior. She concludes that strict criminalization models will not yield sufficiently high levels of compliance. Empirical data suggest that in most cases cooperative models work best with most corporate offenders. Because some corporate managers, however, respond primarily to instrumental concerns, Simpson argues that compliance should also be buttressed by punitive strategies. Her review and application of the relevant empirical literature on corporate crime and compliance combined with her judicious examination of theory and approaches, make a valuable new contribution to the literature on white-collar crime and deterrence and criminal behavior more generally.

Commercial crimes -- Prevention. --- Corporations -- Corrupt practices. --- Corporate bribery --- Corporate corruption --- Commercial crimes --- Corporations --- Corporate crime --- Business ethics --- Crimes, Financial --- Financial crimes --- Offenses affecting the public trade --- Crime --- Prevention --- Corrupt practices --- Commercial crimes. --- Corrupt practices. --- Prevention. --- E-books --- Entreprises --- Infractions économiques --- Pratiques déloyales --- Prévention --- Social Sciences --- Sociology --- Comportement conforme --- Criminalisation --- Delinquance economique et financiere --- Dissuasion --- Efficacite du droit penal

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Some social issues and practices have become dangerous areas for academics to research and write about. ‘Academic freedom’ is increasingly constrained, not just by long established ‘normal’ factors (territoriality, power differentials, competition, protectionism), but also by the increased significance of social media and the rise of identity politics (and activists who treat work which challenges their world view as abusive hate-speech). So extreme are these pressures that some institutions and even statutory bodies now adopt policies and practices which contravene relevant regulations and laws. This book seeks to draw attention to the limiting and damaging effects of academic ‘gagging’. The book, drawn from a special edition of Societies, offers an eclectic series of international articles which may annoy some people. The book challenges taken for granted mainstream assumptions and practices in a number of areas, including gender mainstreaming, social work education, child sexual abuse, the ethnic disaggregation of population groups, fatherhood and masculinity, the erosion of democratic legitimacy, the trap of victimhood and vulnerability, employment practices in universities, and the challenges presented by the widespread and deliberate suppression of scholarship and research. In an analytic postscript Laurent Dubreuil discusses the nature of identity politics and the manner in which its effects can be identified across the many topics covered in these challenging articles.

Early Childhood Education and Care --- child sexual abuse --- prevention policies --- no touch --- teacher–child relationships --- male childcare workers --- stigma --- discrimination --- fear --- panopticon --- moral panic --- Brazilian academia --- interviewing for faculty positions --- Lattes CV --- meritocracy --- criminalisation --- harm --- law --- criminal justice --- freedom --- risk --- abuse --- liberal --- victim --- vulnerability --- critical thinking --- identity politics --- academic freedom --- free speech --- victimhood --- anti-discriminatory practice --- neoliberalism --- shadow management --- new public management --- ombudsman --- rule of law --- transparency --- higher education --- body journal --- Coronavirus --- corporal identity --- narratives --- pandemic --- parenthood --- clan --- academic taboo --- Sweden --- state --- postcolonialism --- research methods --- disparity --- disaggregating data --- Asian Americans --- disability --- mental health --- model minority myth --- free inquiry --- censorship --- conformity --- moral panics --- witch hunts --- heresy --- gender mainstreaming --- Lehrfreiheit --- university autonomy --- UNESCO

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Info, intox ? Complot, rumeur ? La désinformation serait partout, et la vérité nulle part. Ces questions obsèdent nos sociétés où il semble qu’en ligne tous puissent s’exprimer et que rien ne doive rester caché. Pourtant, la désinformation a une histoire. Elle s’exprime pendant la guerre froide et accompagne la mondialisation, avant que le web et les réseaux sociaux ne lui ouvrent de nouveaux horizons. En explorant les mécanismes de ce qui nous abuse et que nous refusons parfois de croire, des systèmes de pouvoir apparaissent et de nouvelles formes d’idéologies se manifestent. Quand la vérité des faits devient l'objet central de nos luttes, la désinformation n’est plus qu’une question morale : elle est un enjeu stratégique

Disinformation --- Internet --- Propaganda --- Mass media --- Désinformation --- Propagande --- Médias --- Objectivity --- Political aspects --- Objectivité --- Aspect politique --- Médias et politique --- Communication in politics --- Mass media and propaganda --- Technological innovations --- Médias et politiqueObjectivité --- Disinformation. --- Désinformation --- Médias --- Objectivité --- Désinformation. --- Médias et politique. --- Objectivité. --- Mass communications --- Médias - Objectivité --- Communication in politics - Technological innovations --- Mass media - Objectivity --- le faux --- politiques de l'illusion --- information, désinformation, surinformation --- banalisations --- falsifications historiques --- stratagèmes --- propagande --- propagande noire --- intoxication --- les crimes de l'autre --- la desinformatsia vue de l'Ouest --- guerres, spectacles et trucages --- criminalisation massive --- technologies de l'illusion --- fabrication des simulacres --- illusion et vérification --- diriger l'attention --- le Moi --- techniques du masque --- les nouveaux pouvoirs contemporains --- économie --- astro turfing et pseudo mouvements citoyens --- géopolitique --- contrôler et propager --- l'Etat --- médias --- la conspiration --- théories du Mal --- fausse conscience et conscience du faux --- dualités idéologiques --- complotisme --- fausses informations --- réseaux sociaux --- technologie --- conspirationnisme

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Some social issues and practices have become dangerous areas for academics to research and write about. ‘Academic freedom’ is increasingly constrained, not just by long established ‘normal’ factors (territoriality, power differentials, competition, protectionism), but also by the increased significance of social media and the rise of identity politics (and activists who treat work which challenges their world view as abusive hate-speech). So extreme are these pressures that some institutions and even statutory bodies now adopt policies and practices which contravene relevant regulations and laws. This book seeks to draw attention to the limiting and damaging effects of academic ‘gagging’. The book, drawn from a special edition of Societies, offers an eclectic series of international articles which may annoy some people. The book challenges taken for granted mainstream assumptions and practices in a number of areas, including gender mainstreaming, social work education, child sexual abuse, the ethnic disaggregation of population groups, fatherhood and masculinity, the erosion of democratic legitimacy, the trap of victimhood and vulnerability, employment practices in universities, and the challenges presented by the widespread and deliberate suppression of scholarship and research. In an analytic postscript Laurent Dubreuil discusses the nature of identity politics and the manner in which its effects can be identified across the many topics covered in these challenging articles.

Humanities --- Social interaction --- Early Childhood Education and Care --- child sexual abuse --- prevention policies --- no touch --- teacher–child relationships --- male childcare workers --- stigma --- discrimination --- fear --- panopticon --- moral panic --- Brazilian academia --- interviewing for faculty positions --- Lattes CV --- meritocracy --- criminalisation --- harm --- law --- criminal justice --- freedom --- risk --- abuse --- liberal --- victim --- vulnerability --- critical thinking --- identity politics --- academic freedom --- free speech --- victimhood --- anti-discriminatory practice --- neoliberalism --- shadow management --- new public management --- ombudsman --- rule of law --- transparency --- higher education --- body journal --- Coronavirus --- corporal identity --- narratives --- pandemic --- parenthood --- clan --- academic taboo --- Sweden --- state --- postcolonialism --- research methods --- disparity --- disaggregating data --- Asian Americans --- disability --- mental health --- model minority myth --- free inquiry --- censorship --- conformity --- moral panics --- witch hunts --- heresy --- gender mainstreaming --- Lehrfreiheit --- university autonomy --- UNESCO