Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book is about how distinctions are drawn between civilians and combatants in modern warfare and how the legal principle of distinction depends on the technical means through which combatants make themselves visibly distinguishable from civilians. The author demonstrates that technologies of visualisation have always been part of the operation of the principle of distinction, arguing that the military uniform sustained the legal categories of civilian and combatant and actively set the boundaries of permissible and prohibited targeting, and so legal and illegal killing. Drawing upon insights from the theory of legal materiality, visual studies, critical fashion studies, and a dozen of military manuals he shows that far from being passive objects of regulation, these technologies help to draw the boundaries of the legitimate target. With its attention to the co-productive relationship between law, technologies of visualisation and legitimation of violence, this book will be relevant to a large community of researchers in international law, international relations, critical military studies, contemporary counterinsurgency operations and the sociology of law.

Combatants and noncombatants (International law)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book makes the case for eliminating the distinction between types of armed conflict under international humanitarian law (IHL), specifically as they apply to persons taking a direct part in the hostilities - be they soldiers or insurgents. Currently, IHL makes a distinction between international and non-international armed conflicts. International armed conflicts are regulated by more treaties than their non-international counterparts. The regulation of international armed conflicts is also considerably more comprehensive than that offered for participants in and victims of non-international armed conflicts. This bifurcation of the law was logical at the time the Geneva Conventions of 1949 were drafted and adopted, as the majority of armed conflicts prior to that point had been international in character. However, in the years following the adoption of the Conventions, there has been a proliferation of non-international armed conflicts, which presents challenges to a body of law that has few tools to adequately address such occurrences. The adoption of the Additional Protocols in 1977 went some way to addressing the legal lacunae that existed, but significant gaps still remain. Mindful of this history, this book tracks the growth and evolution of the laws of armed conflict in the modern era, since the first document of the laws of war produced for the American Civil War. In doing so, this book demonstrates how the law of armed conflict has become increasingly harmonized in its application, with more rules of IHL being generally applicable in all instances of armed conflict, regardless of characterization. [...] [...] This book then makes the argument that the time has come for the final step to be taken, the elimination of the distinction between types of armed conflict, and the complete harmonization of the laws of war. Focusing specifically on the issue of combatants and POWs in armed conflicts, and drawing on the recent US treatment of detainees in Guantanamo Bay in the "War on Terror", this book draws on considerable legal precedent, legal theory, and policy arguments to make the case that it is time for the law relating to the regulation of armed conflicts to be more uniformly applied.

Prisoners of war --- Combatants and noncombatants (International law) --- Prisoners of war. --- Combatants and noncombatants (International law).

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

CIVILIAN WAR CASUALTIES --- COMBATANTS AND NONCOMBATANTS (INTERNATIONAL LAW)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Een fascinerende en spannende inkijk in de huidige maniervan oorlog voeren. Eye in the Skyneemt de leerlingen mee naar discussies tussen militairen en politici diebeslissingen maken over leven en dood op duizenden kilometers afstand. Kolonel Katherine Powell leidt een geheime actie die terroristen in Kenia moet ontmaskeren. Ze maken hiervoor gebruik van drones. Dit dreigt echter verkeerd te gaan wanneer de zogenoemde terroristen een zelfmoordactie beramen waarmee de levens van honderden burgers op het spel komen te staan.Wilt u meer weten over de regels die gelden tijdens eengewapend conflict? Voorlichters van het Rode Kruis komen graag langs om eengastles of presentatie te geven. Neem contact op met hor@redcross.nl (bron movies that matter)

Drone aircraft --- Terrorism --- Terrorists --- Combatants and noncombatants (International law) --- Prevention

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Combatants and noncombatants (International law) --- Civilians in war