Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Blind --- Blindness --- Blind. --- Blindheit --- Sehbehinderung --- Zeitschrift

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Audio description --- Audiodescriptie --- Audovisuele vertaling --- Audiodeskription. --- Audiovisuelles Material. --- Barrierefreiheit. --- Blindheit. --- Translation. --- Translating and interpreting --- Methodology. --- Audiodescriptie. --- Audovisuele vertaling.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Charlie Chaplin, Luis Buñuel, Lars von Trier, Takeshi Kitano: Das Thema Blindheit zieht sich durch die ganze Filmgeschichte. Den blinden Protagonisten kommen dabei ganz unterschiedliche Funktionen zu. Zum einen werden durch sie die spezifischen Wahrnehmungsmöglichkeiten des Kinos sowie technische Neuerungen (wie z.B. vom Stumm- zum Tonfilm) reflektiert; zum anderen werfen sie Fragen nach dem Verhältnis von Körper, Kultur und Behinderung auf. Die Beiträge des Bandes verbinden filmästhetische Problemstellungen mit Ansätzen der Disability Studies und fragen nach den Ikonographien, Codierungen und Narrationen von Blindheit seit den Anfängen des Kinos. Dabei geht es nicht nur darum, wie Blindheit im Film repräsentiert wird, sondern auch um die Macht der Blicke, die Zuschauer- und Kameraposition sowie Voyeurismus. Im Mittelpunkt stehen die »blind spots« der filmischen Wahrnehmung. »Eine interessante, gerade die Frage nach Sinnesverhältnissen vertiefende Lektüre.« Jana Herwig, [rezens.tfm], 18.10.2016 »Äußerst informativ.« Hans Helmut Prinzler, www.hhprinzler.de, 24.03.2016 Besprochen in: GMK-Newsletter, 2 (2016)

Film; Blindheit; Gender; Disability Studies; Körper; Behinderung; Cultural Studies; Medienwissenschaft; Kulturwissenschaft; Blindness; Body; Media Studies --- Blindness. --- Body. --- Cultural Studies. --- Disability Studies. --- Gender. --- Media Studies.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The ancient world often thought in terms of physiognomics—the idea that character can be discerned by studying outward, physical features. That physical descriptions carry moral freight in characterization has been largely missed in modern biblical scholarship, and this study brings that to the forefront. Specifically, this is a study of one particular physical marker—blindness. When we look at Greco-Roman literature, a kind of literary topos begins to emerge, a set of assumptions that ancient audiences would typically make when encountering blind characters. Luke-Acts makes use of such a topos in a way that becomes programmatic, serving as a kind of interpretive key to Luke-Acts that is generally unnoticed in modern scholarship.

Blindheit. --- Sehen. --- Blindness --- Physiognomy --- Face reading --- Metoposcopy --- Characters and characteristics --- Psychology --- Face --- Pathognomy --- Phrenology --- Amaurosis --- Vision disorders --- Biblical teaching. --- Religious aspects --- History of doctrines. --- Apostelgeschichte. --- Bible. --- Luc (Book of the New Testament) --- Lucas (Book of the New Testament) --- Luka (Book of the New Testament) --- Lukan săn zăn︠g︡g (Book of the New Testament) --- Lukas (Book of the New Testament) --- Luke (Book of the New Testament) --- Lūqā (Book of the New Testament) --- Nuga pogŭm (Book of the New Testament) --- Ruka den --- Ruka ni yoru fukuinsho --- Acts (Book of the New Testament) --- Acts of the Apostles --- Chongdo haengjŏn --- Sado haengjŏn --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Character --- Blindness in the Bible. --- Physiognomy. --- Ethology --- Ethics --- Personality