Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The contributions to the 2020 edition of OSCE Insights examine the various crises the OSCE faced during that year. Themes include the efforts of the Minsk Group to manage the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh and the implications of anti-coronavirus measures for the OSCE Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security. Furthermore, authors analyse OSCE conflict cycle tools, the OSCE’s role in the fight against antisemitism, the increasingly limited space for supporting democratic police governance in Central Asia, trust-building in the field of arms control, societal views on the conflict in Eastern Ukraine, relations between the OSCE and the Council of Europe, and Kazakhstan’s aspirations for hosting a connectivity center.
Choose an application
Europa steht vor enormen Herausforderungen: die Gewaltkonflikte in Bergkarabach und der Ukraine bedrohen den Frieden in Europa, die Spannungen zwischen den USA und China geraten zusehends zu einem Großmachtkonflikt, in dem Europa seine Rolle noch finden muss, und die Debatten über die »europäische Souveränität« vernachlässigen die friedenspolitischen Prioritäten zugunsten militärischer Fähigkeiten. Die Auswirkungen der Covid-19-Pandemie auf den globalen Süden erfordern zudem neue Akzente in der Entwicklungspolitik. Zugleich hält weltweit der besorgniserregende Trend zur Entdemokratisierung an. Das Friedensgutachten 2021 analysiert diese Entwicklungen und gibt Empfehlungen für die Politik. Das Friedensgutachten 2020 analysiert vor diesem Hintergrund aktuelle Gewaltkonflikte, zeigt Trends der internationalen Außen-, Sicherheits- und Entwicklungspolitik auf und gibt Empfehlungen für Bundesregierung und Bundestag. Die deutschen Friedensforschungsinstitute (BICC/HSF/IFSH/INEF) geben das Gutachten seit 1987 heraus. O-Ton: »Noch kein Kalter Krieg mit China« - Pascal Abb im Interview bei Telepolis am 08.06.2021. Besprochen in: http://das-flugblatt.de, 11.06.2021, Hannes Nagel
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Peace. --- Arms Control. --- Bergkarabach. --- China. --- Conflict Studies. --- Conflict. --- Covid-19. --- Democracy. --- Disarmament. --- Europe. --- Globalization. --- International Relations. --- Military. --- Political Science. --- Politics. --- Security Policy. --- Sovereignty. --- USA. --- Ukraine. --- Violence. --- War. --- Frieden; Krieg; Konflikt; Sicherheitspolitik; Europa; Europäische Union (EU); Abrüstung; Rüstungskontrolle; Covid-19; USA; China; Bergkarabach; Ukraine; Militär; Souveränität; Demokratie; Politik; Gewalt; Konfliktforschung; Internationale Politik; Globalisierung; Politikwissenschaft; Peace; War; Conflict; Security Policy; Europe; Disarmament; Arms Control; Military; Sovereignty; Democracy; Politics; Violence; Conflict Studies; International Relations; Globalization; Political Science
Choose an application
Zelfbeschikkingsrecht. --- Armenische Frage. --- Selbstbestimmungsrecht. --- Armenians --- History. --- Bergkarabach. --- Armenien. --- Armenier. --- Arménie --- Azerbaïdjan --- Haut-Karabakh (Azerbaïdjan) --- Nagorno-Karabakh (Azerbaijan) --- Armenia --- Armenia (Republic) --- Azerbaijan --- Nagorno-Karabakh (Azerbaïdjan) --- Histoire. --- Relations --- Ethnic relations. --- Histoire --- Relations interethniques --- History --- Arménie --- Azerbaïdjan --- Haut-Karabakh (Azerbaïdjan) --- Nagorno-Karabakh (Azerbaïdjan)
Choose an application
Dr. Heiko Krüger is an attorney at law and commentator on international and European legal affairs in Berlin, Germany. His research interests include secession conflicts, conflict resolution, the conduct of states and the implications of such action. Dr. Krüger is particularly concerned with secession conflicts in the Caucasus region and the Kosovo case. After obtaining his doctorate in law, he worked as a legal clerk at the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Scientific Department of the German Parliament. He has served as a member of the Ethics Committee of the State of Berlin since 2006. This treatise is primarily concerned with the legal aspects of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Current developments make it clear that the juristic aspects of secession conflicts are successively becoming blurred. Also, their significance is being superseded within the framework of conflict resolution attempts. The controversial recognition of Kosovo by several states in 2008 as well as the equally questionable recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia by Russia are merely two aspects. The aim of this treatise is therefore to focus more strongly on the legal positions, and in particular to underline the importance of principles of international law in connection with the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The analysis concentrates on two aspects of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. On the one hand the legitimacy or illegitimacy of the secession of Nagorno-Karabakh is scrutinised in accordance with Soviet law and international law. In this respect, the current developments in the cases of Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia are also taken into account. On the other hand, insight is provided into how the conduct of the Republic of Armenia is to be assessed from an international law perspective.
Law.
---
Law, general.
---
Droit
---
Law
---
Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, 1988-1994
---
Armenia (Republic)
---
Azerbaijan
---
Foreign relations
---
Legitimacy of governments
---
Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, 1988-1994.
---
Recognition (International law)
---
State succession.
---
Karabachkrieg
---
Selbstbestimmungsrecht
---
Sezession
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|