Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Der schaulüsterne Blick: Bilder adressieren affektive Register, fördern somit voyeuristische Tendenzen wie Glotzen, Gaffen und den Drang, sich oder andere im Bild zu exponieren. Digitale Medien ermöglichen direkte Beteiligung und Bewertung, wodurch sich das intrikate Verhältnis zwischen Bildern und gesellschaftlichen Anerkennungsprozessen nachhaltig verschiebt. Dabei hat ein abwertender, entblößender Blick Konjunktur, der neue Bildgenres hervorbringt und das Affektive, Politische und Ökonomische neu verknüpft. Die Beiträger*innen folgen der Karriere des invective gaze vom Analogen zum Digitalen, vom Katastrophenbild bis zum Terror im Livestream.

SOCIAL SCIENCE / Media Studies. --- Affect Theory. --- Culture. --- Digital Image. --- Digital Media. --- Image. --- Internet. --- Media Philosophy. --- Media Studies. --- Media Theory. --- Social Media. --- Viewing Regime.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In Mood and Trope, John Brenkman introduces two provocative propositions to affect theory: that human emotion is intimately connected to persuasion and figurative language; and that literature, especially poetry, lends precision to studying affect because it resides there not in speaking about feelings, but in the way of speaking itself. Engaging a quartet of modern philosophers—Kant, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Deleuze—Brenkman explores how they all approach the question of affect primarily through literature and art. He draws on the differences and dialogues among them, arguing that the vocation of criticism is incapable of systematicity and instead must be attuned to the singularity and plurality of literary and artistic creations. In addition, he confronts these four philosophers and their essential concepts with a wide array of authors and artists, including Pinter and Poe, Baudelaire, Jorie Graham and Li-Young Lee, Shakespeare, Tino Sehgal, and Francis Bacon. Filled with surprising insights, Mood and Trope provides a rich archive for rethinking the nature of affect and its aesthetic and rhetorical stakes.

Emotions in literature. --- Affect (Psychology) in literature. --- Charles Baudelaire. --- Friedrich Nietzsche. --- Gilles Deleuze. --- Immanuel Kant. --- Jorie Graham. --- Martin Heidegger. --- Percy Bysshe Shelley. --- aesthetic theory. --- affect theory. --- emotions. --- Charles Baudelaire. --- Friedrich Nietzsche. --- Gilles Deleuze. --- Immanuel Kant. --- Jorie Graham. --- Martin Heidegger. --- Percy Bysshe Shelley. --- aesthetic theory. --- affect theory. --- emotions.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Challenging prevalent conceptualizations of modernity—which treat it either as a Western ideology imposed by colonialism or as a universal narrative of progress and innovation—this study instead offers close readings of the simultaneous performances and contestations of modernity staged in works by authors such as Rifa’a al-Tahtawi, Ahmad Faris al-Shidyaq, Tayeb Salih, Hanan al-Shaykh, Hamdi Abu Golayyel, and Ahmad Alaidy. In dialogue with affect theory, deconstruction, and psychoanalysis, the book reveals these trials to be a violent and ongoing confrontation with and within modernity. In pointed and witty prose, El-Ariss bridges the gap between Nahda (the so-called Arab project of Enlightenment) and postcolonial and postmodern fiction.

Modernism (Literature) --- Literature, Experimental --- Arabic literature --- Middle Eastern literature --- North African literature --- Avant-garde literature --- Experimental literature --- Avant-garde (Aesthetics) --- Literary style --- History and criticism. --- Affect Theory. --- Ahmad Faris al-Shidyaq. --- Ahmed Alaidy. --- Arab Spring. --- Arabic Literature. --- Hanan al-Shaykh. --- Nahda. --- Rifa'a al-Tahtawi. --- Tayeb Salih. --- Travel Literature.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Friends-they are generous and cooperative with each other in ways that appear to defy standard evolutionary expectations, frequently sacrificing for one another without concern for past behaviors or future consequences. In this fascinating multidisciplinary study, Daniel J. Hruschka synthesizes an array of cross-cultural, experimental, and ethnographic data to understand the broad meaning of friendship, how it develops, how it interfaces with kinship and romantic relationships, and how it differs from place to place. Hruschka argues that friendship is a special form of reciprocal altruism based not on tit-for-tat accounting or forward-looking rationality, but rather on mutual goodwill that is built up along the way in human relationships.

Friendship --- Kinship. --- Human behavior. --- Interpersonal relations. --- Social aspects. --- affect theory. --- africa. --- altruism. --- animal friendships. --- anthropology. --- biocultural anthropology. --- china. --- companionship. --- cooperation. --- cultural anthropology. --- emotions. --- ethnography. --- evolution. --- evolutionary biology. --- family relationships. --- fear. --- friendship. --- generosity. --- germany. --- goodwill. --- human behavior. --- iceland. --- imaginary friends. --- kinship. --- maasai. --- nonfiction. --- platonic relationships. --- psychology. --- reciprocal altruism. --- reciprocity. --- relationships. --- reputation. --- romantic relationships. --- russia. --- science. --- shame. --- social networks. --- society. --- trust.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Judges are society's elders and experts, our masters and mediators. We depend on them to dispense justice with integrity, deliberation, and efficiency. Yet judges, as Alexander Hamilton famously noted, lack the power of the purse or the sword. They must rely almost entirely on their reputations to secure compliance with their decisions, obtain resources, and maintain their political influence. In Judicial Reputation, Nuno Garoupa and Tom Ginsburg explain how reputation is not only an essential quality of the judiciary as a whole, but also of individual judges. Perceptions of judicial systems around the world range from widespread admiration to utter contempt, and as judges participate within these institutions some earn respect, while others are scorned. Judicial Reputation explores how judges respond to the reputational incentives provided by the different audiences they interact with-lawyers, politicians, the media, and the public itself-and how institutional structures mediate these interactions. The judicial structure is best understood not through the lens of legal culture or tradition, but through the economics of information and reputation. Transcending those conventional lenses, Garoupa and Ginsburg employ their long-standing research on the latter to examine the fascinating effects that governmental interactions, multicourt systems, extrajudicial work, and the international rule-of-law movement have had on the reputations of judges in this era.

Judges. --- Judicial process --- Judicial ethics. --- Public opinion. --- judges, reputation, public opinion, honor, integrity, trust, authority, faith, judicial system, courts, admiration, contempt, affect theory, nonfiction, politics, political science, supreme court, lawyers, politicians, media, information, multicourt systems, extrajudicial work, ethics, audience, selection, monitoring, globalization, international law, reform.