Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Bourdieu, Pierre --- 316.2 BOURDIEU, PIERRE --- #VCV monografie 1999 --- 810 Theorie - methode --- 844 Sociale structuur --- 652 Sociologie --- Sociologische richtingen. Sociologische scholen. Sociologen--BOURDIEU, PIERRE --- Sociology --- Methodology. --- History. --- Bourdieu, Pierre, --- 316.2 BOURDIEU, PIERRE Sociologische richtingen. Sociologische scholen. Sociologen--BOURDIEU, PIERRE --- Methodology --- History --- Burdʹe, Pʹer, --- Burdʹe, P. --- Bourdieu, P. --- Pūrtiyu, Piyar, --- 810 Theorie en Methode

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

810 Theorie - methode --- 811 Filosofie --- 815 Geschiedenis --- 157.3 --- 395.8 --- Foucault Michel --- Foucault, Michel --- discipline --- filosofie --- gevangenissen --- straffen --- wijsbegeerte --- geschiedenis der wijsbegeerte, 1900-heden, werken van wijsgeren --- Straffen - Gevangeniswezen --- Criminal law. Criminal procedure --- Philosophy and psychology of culture --- 810 Theorie en Methode --- Gevangenissen ; geschiedenis --- Straffen

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

What makes wars drag on and why do they end when they do? Here H. E. Goemans brings theoretical rigor and empirical depth to a long-standing question of securities studies. He explores how various government leaders assess the cost of war in terms of domestic politics and their own postwar fates. Goemans first develops the argument that two sides will wage war until both gain sufficient knowledge of the other's strengths and weaknesses so as to agree on the probable outcome of continued war. Yet the incentives that motivate leaders to then terminate war, Goemans maintains, can vary greatly depending on the type of government they represent. The author looks at democracies, dictatorships, and mixed regimes and compares the willingness among leaders to back out of wars or risk the costs of continued warfare. Democracies, according to Goemans, will prefer to withdraw quickly from a war they are not winning in order to appease the populace. Autocracies will do likewise so as not to be overthrown by their internal enemies. Mixed regimes, which are made up of several competing groups and which exclude a substantial proportion of the people from access to power, will likely see little risk in continuing a losing war in the hope of turning the tide. Goemans explores the conditions and the reasoning behind this "gamble for resurrection" as well as other strategies, using rational choice theory, statistical analysis, and detailed case studies of Germany, Britain, France, and Russia during World War I. In so doing, he offers a new perspective of the Great War that integrates domestic politics, international politics, and battlefield developments.

Capitulaties [Militaire ] --- Capitulations [Military ] --- Capitulations militaires --- Paix --- Peace --- Peace treaties --- Traités de paix --- Treaties of peace --- Vrede --- Vredesverdragen --- Peace. --- World War, 1914-1918 --- Peace treaties. --- Capitulations, Military. --- 856.4 Conflictresolutie --- 852 Internationale conflicten --- 810 Theorie - methode --- 944 Eerste Wereldoorlog --- Military capitulations --- Surrender --- Military law --- Sieges --- War (International law) --- Treaties --- Coexistence, Peaceful --- Peaceful coexistence --- International relations --- Disarmament --- Peace-building --- Security, International --- War --- Armistices. --- Polemology --- World history --- anno 1910-1919 --- Capitulations, Military --- 810 Theorie en Methode --- Armistices

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Offering a profound and accessible account of how politics is undergoing a shift from the modern to the postmodern, the authors explore the changing ways in which politics function by exploring the values underpinning new politics.

Sociology of culture --- Postmodernism. --- Political science. --- Postmodernisme --- Science politique --- Postmodernism --- Political science --- 810 Theorie - methode --- #SBIB:324H30 --- #SBIB:324H20 --- #SBIB:17H3 --- #SBIB:309H1015 --- #SBIB:014.IO --- Administration --- Civil government --- Commonwealth, The --- Government --- Political theory --- Political thought --- Politics --- Science, Political --- Social sciences --- State, The --- Post-modernism --- Postmodernism (Philosophy) --- Arts, Modern --- Avant-garde (Aesthetics) --- Modernism (Art) --- Philosophy, Modern --- Post-postmodernism --- Politieke cultuur --- Politologie: theorieën (democratie, comparatieve studieën….) --- Politieke wijsbegeerte --- Media: politieke, juridische, ethische, ideologische aspecten (incl. privacy) --- POLITICAL SCIENCE --- General --- Political Science Theory --- Political Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- 810 Theorie en Methode

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In recent decades the study of social movements, revolution, democratization and other non-routine politics has flourished. And yet research on the topic remains highly fragmented, reflecting the influence of at least three traditional divisions. The first of these reflects the view that various forms of contention are distinct and should be studied independent of others. Separate literatures have developed around the study of social movements, revolutions and industrial conflict. A second approach to the study of political contention denies the possibility of general theory in deference to a grounding in the temporal and spatial particulars of any given episode of contention. The study of contentious politics are left to 'area specialists' and/or historians with a thorough knowledge of the time and place in question. Finally, overlaid on these two divisions are stylized theoretical traditions - structuralist, culturalist, and rationalist - that have developed largely in isolation from one another. This book was first published in 2001.

Social movements. --- Quarreling. --- Government, Resistance to. --- Revolutions. --- #SBIB:324H74 --- #SBIB:324H73 --- Insurrections --- Rebellions --- Revolts --- Revolutionary wars --- History --- Political science --- Political violence --- War --- Government, Resistance to --- Civil resistance --- Non-resistance to government --- Resistance to government --- Insurgency --- Nonviolence --- Revolutions --- Contentiousness --- Disputing --- Verbal self-defense --- Movements, Social --- Social history --- Social psychology --- Politieke verandering: sociale bewegingen --- Politieke verandering: oppositie en minderheid, protest, politiek geweld --- WARS -- 327.5 --- REVOLUTIONS -- 327.5 --- HISTORY -- 327.6 --- STRIKES -- 327.6 --- WARS -- 327.6 --- REVOLUTIONS -- 327.6 --- STRIKES -- 327.5 --- #A0505PSA --- Querelles --- Collective behavior --- Democratization --- 850 Vrede- en conflictstudies --- 841.1 Democratisering --- 810 Theorie - methode --- Democratic consolidation --- Democratic transition --- New democracies --- Behavior, Collective --- Crowd behavior --- Crowds --- Mass behavior --- Human behavior --- Social action --- Psychology --- Social movements --- Political systems --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Community organization --- 810 Theorie en Methode --- Comportement collectif --- Mouvements sociaux --- Révolutions --- Démocratisation --- Collective behavior. --- Democratization. --- Résistance au gouvernement --- Révolutions --- Social Sciences --- Sociology