Listing 1 - 10 of 30 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
"The scope of vicarious liability has significantly expanded since its original conception. Today employers are being found liable for actions of employees that they did not authorise, and never would have authorised if asked. They are being held liable for an employee's criminal activity. In the related strict liability field of non-delegable duties, they are being held liable for wrongdoing of independent contractors. Notions of strict liability have grown increasingly isolated in the law of tort, given the exponential growth in the tort of negligence. They require intellectual justification. Such a justification has proven to be elusive and largely unsatisfactory in relation to vicarious liability and to concepts of non-delegable duty. The law of three jurisdictions studied has now apparently embraced the 'enterprise risk' theory to rationalise the imposition of vicarious liability. This book subjects this theory to strong critique by arguing that it has many weaknesses, which the courts should acknowledge. It suggests that a rationalisation of the liability of an employer for the actions of an employee lies in more traditional legal doctrine which would serve to narrow the circumstances in which an employer is legally liable for a wrong committed by an employee."--Bloomsbury Publishing.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Respondeat superior --- Strict liability --- Torts
Choose an application
"This book adopts a novel approach to resolving the present difficulties experienced by the courts in imposing strict liability for the tort of another. It looks beyond the traditional classifications of 'vicarious liability' and 'liability for breach of a non-delegable duty of care' and for the first time seeks to explain all instances of strict liability for the tort of another in terms of the various relationships in which the courts impose such liability. The book shows that, despite appearances, there is a unifying feature to the various relationships in which the courts currently impose strict liability for the tort of another. That feature is authority. Whenever the courts impose strict liability for the tort of another, the defendant is either vested with authority over the person who committed a tort against the claimant or has vested or conferred a form of authority upon that person in respect of the claimant. This book uses this feature of authority to construct a new expositive framework within which strict liability for the tort of another can be understood"--
Respondeat superior --- Strict liability --- Torts
Choose an application
Choose an application
International crimes. --- Respondeat superior. --- International criminal law.
Choose an application
Liability (Law) --- Respondeat superior --- Third parties (Law)
Choose an application
A republication of this highly significant work of 1965, this book addresses the defence of superior orders in the context of national and international law, providing a detailed analysis that remains relevant. With a new preface by the author, this book is an accessible text for scholars and practitioners of international criminal law.
International crimes. --- Respondeat superior. --- International criminal law.
Choose an application
Torts --- Criminal intent --- Respondeat superior --- Torts - France --- Criminal intent - France --- Respondeat superior - France
Choose an application
Master and servant --- Respondeat superior --- Third parties (Law)
Listing 1 - 10 of 30 | << page >> |
Sort by
|