Listing 1 - 10 of 37 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Does U.S. assistance to the security forces of repressive states improve the effectiveness of internal security forces in countering security threats? Does it improve the accountability and human rights records of these forces? This book addresses these questions by examining the results of U.
Military assistance, American. --- Security Assistance Program. --- Security Assistance Program --- Military assistance, American --- Armies --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- American military assistance --- Economic assistance, American --- Security, International
Choose an application
Police training. --- Economic assistance, American. --- Military assistance, American. --- American military assistance --- American economic assistance --- Mutual security program, 1951 --- -Police --- Police professionalization --- Training --- Training of
Choose an application
Security Assistance Program --- Military assistance, American --- Economic assistance, American --- Security, International --- Economic assistance, American. --- Military assistance, American. --- Security, International. --- Management --- Management. --- Collective security --- International security --- International relations --- Disarmament --- International organization --- Peace --- American military assistance --- American economic assistance --- Mutual security program, 1951 --- -American military assistance --- Assistance militaire américaine --- Aide économique américaine
Choose an application
This report explores the nature of the risks inherent in U.S. security sector assistance to the fragile states of Africa and how the United States might better anticipate and mitigate these risks. It examines these issues through a review of qualitative and quantitative literature from both the academic and policy fields and through interviews conducted throughout the agencies of the U.S. government. The quantitative literature suggests a stark dilemma for those responsible for U.S. security sector assistance to the AFRICOM area of responsibility: The countries that are most in need of assistance are usually the ones least able to make positive use of it. Case studies of security sector assistance in the fragile countries in Africa are used to trace multiple specific pathways by which such assistance can have negative second- and third-order effects. Finally, the report provides numerous recommendations about ways in which the United States can improve the processes by which it monitors and evaluates, plans, and implements security sector assistance in the fragile states of Africa and more generally.
Military assistance, American --- Security sector --- Political stability --- Conflict management --- Armies --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Risk assessment --- Homeland security sector --- Internal security sector --- National security sector --- American military assistance --- Public administration
Choose an application
Business, Economy and Management --- Social Sciences --- Economics --- Developmental Issues & Socioeconomic Studies --- Economic assistance, American --- Military assistance, American --- Economic assistance --- Economic assistance. --- Economic assistance, American. --- Military assistance, American. --- Internationale Wirtschaftshilfe. --- Entwicklungshilfe. --- Militärhilfe. --- USA. --- Entwicklungsbank. --- Entwicklungsorganisation. --- Welt. --- American military assistance --- American economic assistance --- Mutual security program, 1951 --- -American military assistance --- -Economic aid --- Foreign aid program --- Foreign assistance --- Grants-in-aid, International --- International economic assistance --- International grants-in-aid --- Economic policy --- International economic relations --- Conditionality (International relations) --- Economic aid
Choose an application
#SBIB:327.5H22 --- #SBIB:328H512 --- Ontwapeningsproblemen - bewapening --- Instellingen en beleid: Midden-Oosten / landen in het Midden-Oosten --- Arms control --- Military assistance, American --- National security --- American military assistance --- Security, International --- Arms race --- Disarmament --- Military readiness --- Arab countries --- Arab world --- Arabic countries --- Arabic-speaking states --- Islamic countries --- Middle East --- Defenses --- Economic aspects.
Choose an application
Defense industries --- Arms transfers --- Military assistance, American --- Industrie militaire --- Armes --- Assistance militaire américaine --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Aspect moral --- Vente --- 874 Wapenhandel --- 882.4 Noord-Amerika --- Assistance militaire américaine --- Armaments industries --- Arms sales --- Military sales --- Military supplies industry --- Munitions --- Sale of military equipment --- American military assistance --- Arms traffic --- Foreign military sales --- Industries --- International trade --- Arms race --- Military assistance
Choose an application
Iran-Contra Affair, 1985-1990 --- Military assistance, American --- -Military assistance, American --- -#BUAR:bibl.de Bock --- American military assistance --- Contra-Iran Affair, 1985-1990 --- Contragate, 1985-1990 --- Iran-Contra Arms Scandal, 1985-1990 --- Irangate, 1985-1990 --- Political corruption --- North, Oliver --- Iran-Contra Affair, 1985-1990. --- #BUAR:bibl.de Bock --- North, Oliver.
Choose an application
The five U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Regional Centers for Security Studies have been helping partner nations build strategic capacity for almost 20 years. However, recent DoD budget constraints have put pressure on the regional centers (RCs) to increase efficiency. The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) asked RAND to conduct a study on the overall impact of the RCs, their effectiveness in advancing DoD policy priorities, the ways in which they assess their programs, and ways in which they could improve their impact and efficiency and the resulting outcomes. The RAND study team found that centers have had great success at the missions they have undertaken. They are high-impact components of U.S. security cooperation and engagement efforts, despite their relatively small budgets. The team identified 24 ways in which the centers advance U.S. interests, including building partner capacity, building relationships, fostering pro-U.S. outlooks, offering unique opportunities for engagement, and promoting regional dialogue that reduces tensions. However, RCs should improve impact-oriented data collection and analysis for improved assessment, methodically collecting such data over time. OSD and the combatant commands should improve their oversight and management of the RCs to ensure alignment with department- and theater-level objectives. In addition, OSD should maintain the RCs' focus on regional security challenges rather than refashioning them to address specific threats. Options to consider for greater impact include evaluating the balance between core residential courses and in-region workshops and determining whether and to what extent the centers should develop customized programs for DoD components so as to secure funds beyond the core budget they receive from OSD.
National security --- Military assistance, American --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Armies --- International cooperation --- American military assistance --- United States. --- Management --- Evaluation. --- D.O.D. --- DOD (Department of Defense) --- Mei-kuo kuo fang pu --- Ministerstvo oborony SShA --- National Military Establishment (U.S.) --- Министерство обороны США
Choose an application
The United States faces a unique set of challenges and opportunities in strengthening security and justice sector partnerships in the Middle East and North Africa. Against the backdrop of the Arab uprisings, the U.S. government has issued policy guidance relating to foreign assistance more broadly and security sector assistance in particular. RAND researchers analyzed potential new partnership models that could help implement this guidance, simultaneously strengthening security and justice sector cooperation and promoting reform across the Arab world and beyond. They devised the Enhanced Partnership Planning Model, which focuses on improving collaborative planning, rather than on using assistance as leverage to require partner nations to do what the United States wants. The model serves as a flexible framework that could support tailored, rigorous SJS planning by U.S. and partner nation stakeholders. This framework can support both policy-makers and program managers as they seek to implement new policy guidelines that integrate elements of accountability and reform while continuing to advance core U.S. interests and equities in a rapidly evolving regional context.
Military assistance, American --- Political planning --- Security Assistance Program --- Arab Spring, 2010 --- -Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Armies --- Arab Awakening, 2010 --- -Planning in politics --- Public policy --- American military assistance --- -Economic assistance, American --- Security, International --- Planning in politics --- Planning --- Policy sciences --- Politics, Practical --- Public administration --- -Military assistance, American
Listing 1 - 10 of 37 | << page >> |
Sort by
|