Listing 1 - 10 of 25 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
"L'attentat contre Charlie Hebdo, contre l'Hyper Cacher, puis la manifestation du 11 janvier : choc, traumatisme, réponse historique donnée par des millions de personnes et des responsables de dizaines de nations. À la suite de ces terribles journées de janvier, le quotidien Le Monde a donné la parole à des intellectuels pour tenter de penser, ensemble, l'événement. Car si l'accord est total sur les faits - il s'agit du plus grand rassemblement citoyen depuis 1945 -, le désaccord est complet sur leur interprétation. Pour les uns, la France a montré au monde entier qu'elle pouvait faire société. Pour les autres, une partie du peuple a manqué. Le 11 janvier est-il la promesse d'un pacte républicain réaffirmé ou le symptôme d'une communauté nationale disloquée ? Quinze interventions destinées à passer du réflexe à la réflexion."--P. [4] of cover.
Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015 --- Republicanism --- Terrorism --- Islamic fundamentalism
Choose an application
Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015 --- Terrorism --- Islamic fundamentalism --- Islam and politics --- Religious aspects --- Islam --- Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015. --- Islamic fundamentalism. --- Islam and politics. --- History --- Islam. --- Charlie Hebdo Attack (Paris, France : 2015) --- Terrorism - Religious aspects - Islam
Choose an application
"The Charlie Hebdo attacks were neither the first nor the last within a wave of political violence with religious, fundamentalist motivations that has affected Arab as well as Western countries. In the latter, after the deadly attack on the Twin Towers in New York City on September 11, 2001, the bombs in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005 shocked the public. Given the religious beliefs and claims of the perpetrators, the ensuing debate revolved around a predictable cleavage. On one side, the Right called for law and order, rallying around the protection of Christian values against invasion by Islam (and migrants in general). On the other side were those defending the values of inclusion and pluralism, as well as migrants' rights overall. The fact that the target of the January 2015 attacks was a journal long identified with the left challenged the established path of argumentation. The right now had to defend freedom of speech for what was often considered a blasphemous outlet. On the left, the argument now had to consider potential limitations not only on free speech, but also on tolerance and pluralism. The attacks thus produced a short circuit, collapsing the debate on several issues related to various dimensions of citizenship, from freedom to security. They did so in a highly emotional atmosphere in which an in- versus out-polarization tended to rise, with Islam emerging as the core definitional element of the attackers and, therefore, of the problem itself. Indeed, the Charlie Hebdo attacks signaled a shift in the strategies of Islamist political violence from targeting the symbols of institutions of Western power - as with the September 11 attacks or the disruptive bombings of public transportation, with indiscriminately selected victims - to the targeting of what was perceived as an alternative, libertarian symbol. The attacks certainly triggered increased security measures and more exclusive politics towards migration, with securitarian policies and increased border control. As they were followed by other brutal acts of violence in France in November and in Belgium the following year, they contributed to calls for and practices of states of emergency that further reduced civil and political rights. The attacks also further influenced the reactions to the so-called "refugee crisis" in 2015 and 2016, as fears about the "terrorists" potentially hidden among the asylum seekers often trumped compassion towards them. While similar acts of political violence often have important consequences, in particular in terms of the policy responses to them - as frequently represented in the literature on terrorism and counter-terrorism - we want to address a specific effect of the Charlie Hebdo attacks by looking at the public debates produced by the event. This perspective seems particularly relevant as acts of clandestine political violence tend to have consequences especially at the symbolic level (della Porta 2015). The forms of action and its victims are part of the message that the perpetrators want to spread. In fact, they do not aim just at terrorizing, but also at articulating - to a certain extent at least - their claims through their deeds. While the violent actors send signals, their message is filtered and brokered as it enters a complex communication field. Indeed, violent acts work as catalyzers of discursive turns, as they are channeled within public spheres in which words, in addition to deeds, have significance"--
Citizenship. --- Citizenship --- Cultural pluralism --- Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015 --- Terrorism - Prevention --- Terrorism
Choose an application
Islam and philosophy --- Islamic modernism --- Islam --- Islam and state --- Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015 --- Islam - 21st century
Choose an application
Terrorism --- Islamic fundamentalism --- Authors, French --- Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015 --- Wolinski, Maryse --- Wolinski, Georges, - 1934-2015
Choose an application
Choose an application
L'image est aujourd'hui consommée comme si elle n'était qu'une sorte de milieu transparent d'une incontestable réalité. On a assassiné les dessinateurs de Charlie Hebdo comme si leurs caricatures n'étaient pas des dessins… « Je n'ai pas l'impression d'égorger quelqu'un avec un feutre », disait Charb… Le feutre de Charb disparaît ; la caricature disparaît en tant que telle.
Art --- Blasphemy (Islam) --- Caricatures and cartoons --- Iconoclasm --- Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015 --- Terrorism --- Freedom of expression
Choose an application
Choose an application
Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015. --- Terrorism --- Islamic fundamentalism --- Attentat terroriste contre Charlie Hebdo, Paris, France, 2015 --- Terrorisme --- Intégrisme islamique --- Charlie hebdo --- France --- Ethnic relations --- History --- Social conditions --- Relations interethniques --- Histoire --- Conditions sociales --- Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015 --- Charlie Hebdo --- Terrorism - France - Paris --- Islamic fundamentalism - France - Paris --- France - Ethnic relations - History - 21st century --- France - Social conditions - 21st century
Choose an application
Après les attentats parisiens des 7, 8 et 9 janvier 2015, qui ont notamment décimé la rédaction du magazine satirique Charlie Hebdo, on a vu fleurir dans les "marches républicaines" du 11 janvier, à l'instar du slogan "Je suis Charlie" affiché en signe de solidarité et de protestation par les manifestants, les panneaux "Voltaire est Charlie". Alors qu'on ne lisait plus beaucoup Voltaire (de même que les lecteurs boudaient Charlie Hebdo), les ventes de son Traité sur la tolérance se sont brusquement envolées, l'ouvrage paraissant être de nouveau d'actualité. En même temps, de nombreux articles de presse présentaient Voltaire comme ayant toujours été en première ligne du combat multiséculaire pour la tolérance et la liberté. Un tel engouement pour Voltaire, dans ces circonstances précises, était-il justifié ? Voltaire était-il vraiment un héros (un héraut aussi) de la tolérance, un chantre de la liberté d'expression, un défenseur de la justice, un parangon de la vérité ? Peut-on vraiment, sans se fourvoyer, faire encore référence à lui de nos jours quand tolérance, liberté, justice et vérité sont menacées, comme ce fut le cas en janvier 2015 ? Voltaire aurait-il été Charlie ?
Listing 1 - 10 of 25 | << page >> |
Sort by
|