Listing 1 - 10 of 17 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Linguistics --- Language acquisition. --- Acquisition of language --- Developmental linguistics --- Developmental psycholinguistics --- Language and languages --- Language development in children --- Psycholinguistics, Developmental --- Interpersonal communication in children --- Psycholinguistics --- Linguistic science --- Science of language --- Research --- Methodology. --- History --- Acquisition --- Chomsky, Noam. --- Chomsky, Noam A. --- Language acquisition --- Research&delete& --- Methodology --- Chomsky, Noam --- Chomsky, Abraham Noam
Choose an application
This book aims to reconcile the generative considerations of Jackendoff’s Parallel Architecture (PA) with the European structuralist approach to naming. It shows that there are good reasons to single out word formation as a separate component in PA. It demonstrates that it is a drawback not to distinguish word formation, and explains that the function of word formation rules is different from the function of the lexicon and rules of grammar. After making the argument for a separate word formation component, the book sets out to determine which types of rule qualify as part of this component. Traditionally, the boundaries of word formation with inflection and with syntax have been a matter of debate. By focusing on the naming function, the book poses a guiding principle for determining which rules should be in the word formation component. The position of morphology in the architecture of grammar has always been an issue of debate in generative linguistics. Since Chomsky (1970), this question has been framed in terms of the Lexicalist Hypothesis. Compared to Chomsky’s architectures, Jackendoff’s Parallel Architecture places phonetic and conceptual structures at the same level as syntactic structure, i.e. connected by bidirectional linking rules rather than interpretation rules. One of the consequences is that PA does not formally distinguish lexicon entries from rules of grammar. This changes the setting for the question of the autonomy of morphology, because the Lexicalist Hypothesis depends on this distinction.
Grammar, Comparative and general. --- Morphology. --- Grammar. --- Syntax. --- Comparative grammar --- Grammar --- Grammar, Philosophical --- Grammar, Universal --- Language and languages --- Philosophical grammar --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative --- Grammar, Comparative and general—Morphology. --- Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax --- Syntax
Choose an application
"In the history of generative grammar, the question of the semantics of compounds was caught up in what Newmeyer (1986) called the "Linguistic Wars", the conflict between generative semantics and interpretive semantics. An important difference between the two sides was the place they attributed to semantics in the architecture of grammar. In generative semantics, the semantic representation was the starting point for syntactic processing. The syntactic level of Deep Structure had been merged with the underlying semantic representation. In interpretive semantics, the semantic representation was derived from a syntactic representation by means of interpretation rules"-- "The question of how to determine the meaning of compounds was prominent in early generative morphology, but lost importance after the late 1970s. In the past decade, it has been revived by the emergence of a number of frameworks that are better suited to studying this question than earlier ones. In this book, three frameworks for studying the semantics of compounding are presented by their initiators: Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture, Lieber's theory of lexical semantics, and Štekauer's onomasiological theory. Common to these presentations is a focus on English noun-noun compounds. In the following chapters, these theories are then applied to different types of compounding (phrasal, A+N, neoclassical) and other languages (French, German, Swedish, Greek). Finally, a comparison highlights how each framework offers particular insight into the meaning of compounds. An exciting new contribution to the field, this book will be of interest to morphologists, semanticists and cognitive linguists"--
Grammar, Comparative and general --- Semantics. --- Formal semantics --- Semasiology --- Semiology (Semantics) --- Comparative linguistics --- Information theory --- Language and languages --- Lexicology --- Meaning (Psychology) --- Derivational morphology --- Word formation --- Composition (Grammar) --- Compound words --- Words, Compound --- Compound words. --- Word formation. --- Derivation --- Morphology --- Composition --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Compound words --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Word formation --- Semantics
Choose an application
Computerlinguïstiek. --- Taal en talen --- Terminologie --- Vertaalkunde. --- standaardisatie. --- gegevensverwerking.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Grammar, Comparative and general --- Compound words --- Inflection --- Morphology --- Word formation
Choose an application
Drawing on detailed case studies across a range of languages, including English, German, Dutch, Italian, Portuguese, Polish, Czech, Russian, Lithuanian and Greek, this book examines the different factors that determine the outcome of the interaction between borrowing and word formation.
Language and languages --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Derivational morphology --- Word formation --- International words --- Loan words --- Loanwords --- Foreign words and phrases. --- Word formation. --- Derivation --- Morphology --- Foreign elements --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Foreign words and phrases
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 17 | << page >> |
Sort by
|