Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, debt levels in emerging and developing economies have surged raising concerns about fiscal sustainability. Historically, negative interest-growth differentials in these countries have played a debt-stabilizing role. But is this enough to prevent countries from falling into debt distress? Drawing from a sample of 150 emerging and developing economies going back to the 1970s, we find that interest-growth differentials have remained relatively low, dampening debt increases in the run up to a crisis. But in the face of persistent primary deficits, debt service tends to rise abruptly—particularly in emerging markets—and a fiscal crisis ensues. There is also evidence that a large part of the debt build-up around crises stems from valuation effects associated with external debt and the materialization of contingent liabilities. These findings underscore that, though not necessarily a red-herring, low interest-growth differentials cannot fully offset the deleterious effects of large fiscal deficits, forex exposures, or hidden debts.
Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Exports and Imports --- Public Finance --- Banks and Banking --- Fiscal Policy --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Debt --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Public Administration --- Public Sector Accounting and Audits --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- International economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Finance --- Public debt --- Debt sustainability analysis --- External debt --- Real interest rates --- Financial services --- Contingent liabilities --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Debts, External --- Debts, Public --- Interest rates --- Fiscal policy --- Argentina
Choose an application
With public debt soaring across the world, a growing concern is whether current debt levels are a harbinger of fiscal crises, thereby restricting the policy space in a downturn. The empirical evidence to date is however inconclusive, and the true cost of debt may be overstated if interest rates remain low. To shed light into this debate, this paper re-examines the importance of public debt as a leading indicator of fiscal crises using machine learning techniques to account for complex interactions previously ignored in the literature. We find that public debt is the most important predictor of crises, showing strong non-linearities. Moreover, beyond certain debt levels, the likelihood of crises increases sharply regardless of the interest-growth differential. Our analysis also reveals that the interactions of public debt with inflation and external imbalances can be as important as debt levels. These results, while not necessarily implying causality, show governments should be wary of high public debt even when borrowing costs seem low.
Exports and Imports --- Financial Risk Management --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Intelligence (AI) & Semantics --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Fiscal Policy --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- International Finance Forecasting and Simulation --- Debt --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- Financial Crises --- Technological Change: Choices and Consequences --- Diffusion Processes --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Public finance & taxation --- International economics --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Machine learning --- Public debt --- External debt --- Financial crises --- Personal income --- Debts, Public --- Debts, External --- Income --- United States
Choose an application
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, debt levels in emerging and developing economies have surged raising concerns about fiscal sustainability. Historically, negative interest-growth differentials in these countries have played a debt-stabilizing role. But is this enough to prevent countries from falling into debt distress? Drawing from a sample of 150 emerging and developing economies going back to the 1970s, we find that interest-growth differentials have remained relatively low, dampening debt increases in the run up to a crisis. But in the face of persistent primary deficits, debt service tends to rise abruptly—particularly in emerging markets—and a fiscal crisis ensues. There is also evidence that a large part of the debt build-up around crises stems from valuation effects associated with external debt and the materialization of contingent liabilities. These findings underscore that, though not necessarily a red-herring, low interest-growth differentials cannot fully offset the deleterious effects of large fiscal deficits, forex exposures, or hidden debts.
Argentina --- Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Exports and Imports --- Public Finance --- Banks and Banking --- Fiscal Policy --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Debt --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Public Administration --- Public Sector Accounting and Audits --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- International economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Finance --- Public debt --- Debt sustainability analysis --- External debt --- Real interest rates --- Financial services --- Contingent liabilities --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Debts, External --- Debts, Public --- Interest rates --- Fiscal policy
Choose an application
With public debt soaring across the world, a growing concern is whether current debt levels are a harbinger of fiscal crises, thereby restricting the policy space in a downturn. The empirical evidence to date is however inconclusive, and the true cost of debt may be overstated if interest rates remain low. To shed light into this debate, this paper re-examines the importance of public debt as a leading indicator of fiscal crises using machine learning techniques to account for complex interactions previously ignored in the literature. We find that public debt is the most important predictor of crises, showing strong non-linearities. Moreover, beyond certain debt levels, the likelihood of crises increases sharply regardless of the interest-growth differential. Our analysis also reveals that the interactions of public debt with inflation and external imbalances can be as important as debt levels. These results, while not necessarily implying causality, show governments should be wary of high public debt even when borrowing costs seem low.
United States --- Exports and Imports --- Financial Risk Management --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Intelligence (AI) & Semantics --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Fiscal Policy --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- International Finance Forecasting and Simulation --- Debt --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- Financial Crises --- Technological Change: Choices and Consequences --- Diffusion Processes --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Public finance & taxation --- International economics --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Machine learning --- Public debt --- External debt --- Financial crises --- Personal income --- Debts, Public --- Debts, External --- Income
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|