Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
"Biomedical research affects society in many ways. It has been shown to improve health, create jobs, add to our knowledge, and foster new collaborations. Despite the complexity of modern research, many of the metrics used to evaluate the impacts of research still focus on the traditional, often academic, part of the research pathway, covering areas such as the amount of grant funding received and the number of peer-reviewed publications. In response to increasing expectations of accountability and transparency, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), in collaboration with RAND Europe, undertook a project to help communicate the wider value of biomedical research. The initiative developed resources to support academic medical centers in evaluating the outcomes and impacts of their research using approaches relevant to various stakeholders, including patients, providers, administrators, and legislators. This report presents 100 ideas for metrics that can be used assess and communicate the value of biomedical research. The list is not comprehensive, and the metrics are not fully developed, but they should serve to stimulate and broaden thinking about how academic medical centers can communicate the value of their research to a broad range of stakeholders."--Publisher's description.
Biomedical Research --- Program Evaluation. --- Cost-Benefit Analysis. --- statistics & numerical data.
Choose an application
This work explores impacts of cardiovascular and stroke research funded 15-20 years ago and draws out aspects associated with high or low impact. It describes 29 case studies of grants from Australia, Canada and UK. Policy summary volume.
Aged. --- Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Complications. --- Clinical neuropsychology. --- Cognition Disorders -- etiology. --- Cardiovascular system --- Cerebrovascular disease --- Research. --- Apoplexy --- Brain --- Cerebral circulation disorders --- Cerebral vascular accident --- Cerebrovascular accident --- Cerebrovascular disorders --- Cerebrovascular syndrome --- CVA (Disease) --- Stroke --- Circulatory system --- Vascular system --- Blood-vessels --- Diseases --- Neglect (Neurology) --- Blood --- Circulation
Choose an application
This report, prepared for and funded by the Arthritis Research Campaign (arc), presents the results of an evaluation of 16 research grants. The report presents a framework that conceptualises the relationship between research inputs, process, output and outcomes.
Arthritis. --- Arthritis --- Research
Choose an application
The Research Assessment Exercise is used to assess the quality of, and determine core government funding for, research carried out in UK universities. This report provided evidence for a review of the process. The overwhelming majority of participants thought research should be assessed using a system based on peer review; that there was a strong desire for a system with clear rules and transparent procedures; and that there was a need for improved systems to assess inter- and multi-disciplinary research work.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|