Listing 1 - 9 of 9 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
We study a model where an employer, trying to fill a vacancy, engages in optimal sequential search by drawing from two subpopulations of candidates who differ in their "discourse systems": during an interview, a minority candidate with a discourse system not shared with the employer conveys a noisier unbiased signal of ability than does a majority candidate. We show that, when the employer is "selective," minority candidates are underrepresented in the permanent workforce, fired at greater rates, and underrepresented among initial hires, even though the employer has no taste for discrimination and the populations are alike in their average ability. Furthermore, workplace diversity is increased if: (1) the cost of firing is reduced, (2) the cost of interviewing is increased, (3) the opportunity cost of leaving the position unfilled is increased, or (4) the prior probability that a candidate can perform the job is increased. Indeed, if the prior probability is sufficiently high, or the cost of firing sufficiently low, then minority candidates may be overrepresented in the permanent workforce.
Diversity in the workplace. --- Electronic books. -- local. --- Multiculturalism. --- Cultural diversity policy --- Cultural pluralism --- Cultural pluralism policy --- Ethnic diversity policy --- Multiculturalism --- Cultural diversity in the workplace --- Cultural diversity in workforce --- Diversity in the workforce --- Diversity in the work place --- Multicultural diversity in the workplace --- Multicultural workforce --- Workforce diversity --- Government policy --- Social policy --- Anti-racism --- Ethnicity --- Cultural fusion --- Personnel management --- Labor --- Demography --- Firm Behavior --- Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement --- Labor Discrimination --- Labor Discrimination: Public Policy --- Demographic Economics: General --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure --- Demand and Supply of Labor: General --- Labour --- income economics --- Population & demography --- Population and demographics --- Labor force --- Unemployment --- Unemployment rate --- Labor markets --- Population --- Labor market --- Netherlands, The --- Income economics
Choose an application
We show that too much meritocracy, modeled as accuracy of performance ranking in contests, can be a bad thing: in contests with homogeneous agents, it reduces output and is Pareto inefficient. In contests with sufficiently heterogeneous agents, discouragement and complacency effects further reduce the benefits of meritocracy. Perfect meritocracy may be optimal only for intermediate levels of heterogeneity.
Merit (Ethics) --- Desert (Ethics) --- Moral desert (Ethics) --- Ethics --- Budgeting --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis --- Market Design --- Allocative Efficiency --- Cost-Benefit Analysis --- Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement --- Organization of Production --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- National Budget --- Budget Systems --- Finance --- Budgeting & financial management --- Competition --- Income inequality --- Budget planning and preparation --- Financial markets --- National accounts --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Income distribution --- Budget --- Netherlands, The
Choose an application
The Limits of Meritocracy.
Choose an application
In the presence of competing interest groups, this paper examines how the form of votebuying contracts affects policy outcomes. We study contracts contingent upon individual votes, policy outcomes, and/or vote shares. Voters either care about their individual votes, or about the policy outcome. We find that vote buying is cheaper when what can be contracted upon coincides with what voters care about. Vote buying becomes extremely costly, or even impossible, when there is no such coincidence. Finally, vote buying is extremely cheap, or even free, when contracts can be contingent upon both individual votes and vote shares.
Competition. --- Corruption. --- Electronic books. -- local. --- Social Welfare & Social Work --- Social Sciences --- Criminology, Penology & Juvenile Delinquency --- Competition --- Competition (Economics) --- Competitiveness (Economics) --- Economic competition --- Corrupt practices --- Economic aspects --- Commerce --- Conglomerate corporations --- Covenants not to compete --- Industrial concentration --- Monopolies --- Open price system --- Supply and demand --- Trusts, Industrial --- Ethics --- Finance: General --- Taxation --- Criminology --- Social Choice --- Clubs --- Committees --- Associations --- Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior --- Positive Analysis of Policy-Making and Implementation --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Bureaucracy --- Administrative Processes in Public Organizations --- Corruption --- Finance --- Public finance & taxation --- Corporate crime --- white-collar crime --- Tax incentives --- Financial markets --- Crime --- United Kingdom --- White-collar crime
Choose an application
We study vote buying by competing interest groups in a variety of electoral and contractual settings. While increasing the size of a voting body reduces its buyability in the absence of competition, we show that larger voting bodies may be more buyable than smaller voting bodies when interest groups compete. In contrast, imposing the secret ballot---which we model as forcing interest groups to contract on outcomes rather than votes---is an effective way to fight vote buying in the presence of competition, but much less so in its absence. We also study more sophisticated vote buying contracts. We show that, regardless of competition, the option to contract on both votes and outcomes is worthless, as it does not affect buyability as compared to contracting only on votes. In contrast, when interest groups can contract on votes and vote shares, we show that voting bodies are uniquely at risk of being bought.
Finance: General --- Taxation --- Criminology --- Social Choice --- Clubs --- Committees --- Associations --- Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior --- Positive Analysis of Policy-Making and Implementation --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Bureaucracy --- Administrative Processes in Public Organizations --- Corruption --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Finance --- Corporate crime --- white-collar crime --- Public finance & taxation --- Competition --- Tax incentives --- Financial markets --- Crime --- Taiwan Province of China --- Voting research. --- Elections --- Lobbying. --- Pressure groups. --- Corrupt practices. --- White-collar crime
Choose an application
As a means to reduce delays in public works implementation, a number of Brazilian states have recently reformed their procurement rules allowing contractor price proposals to be assessed before the technical evaluation of submitted bids is undertaken (in a procedure known as inverSao das fases). In order to evaluate the effects of such reform, this paper adopts a difference-in-differences methodology to compare the procurement performance of Sao Paulo state (a reformer state) and Minas Gerais' (a non-reformer state) largest water and sewage utility along three efficiency dimensions: (i) procurement process duration; (ii) likelihood of complaint resolution litigation; and (iii) prices paid to contractors. The analysis finds that the reform is associated with a 24 day reduction in the duration of procurement processes for large projects and a 7 percentage point drop in the likelihood of court challenges irrespective of project size. Although both effects are economically important, only the latter is statistical significant. Finally, the paper finds no evidence of an effect of the procurement reform on prices paid.
Contract Law --- E-Business --- Economic performance --- Government Procurement --- Investment and Investment Climate --- Investment projects --- Law and Development --- Private entities --- Producers --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Public Sector Development --- Rule of law
Choose an application
We show that too much meritocracy, modeled as accuracy of performance ranking incontests, can be a bad thing: in contests with homogeneous agents, it reduces output and isPareto inefficient. In contests with sufficiently heterogeneous agents, discouragement andcomplacency effects further reduce the benefits of meritocracy. Perfect meritocracy maybe optimal only for intermediate levels of heterogeneity.
Choose an application
As a means to reduce delays in public works implementation, a number of Brazilian states have recently reformed their procurement rules allowing contractor price proposals to be assessed before the technical evaluation of submitted bids is undertaken (in a procedure known as inverSao das fases). In order to evaluate the effects of such reform, this paper adopts a difference-in-differences methodology to compare the procurement performance of Sao Paulo state (a reformer state) and Minas Gerais' (a non-reformer state) largest water and sewage utility along three efficiency dimensions: (i) procurement process duration; (ii) likelihood of complaint resolution litigation; and (iii) prices paid to contractors. The analysis finds that the reform is associated with a 24 day reduction in the duration of procurement processes for large projects and a 7 percentage point drop in the likelihood of court challenges irrespective of project size. Although both effects are economically important, only the latter is statistical significant. Finally, the paper finds no evidence of an effect of the procurement reform on prices paid.
Contract Law --- E-Business --- Economic performance --- Government Procurement --- Investment and Investment Climate --- Investment projects --- Law and Development --- Private entities --- Producers --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Public Sector Development --- Rule of law
Choose an application
This paper offers novel evidence on the impact of raising bank capital requirements in the context of an emerging market: Peru. Using quarterly bank-level data and exploiting the adoption of bank-specific capital buffers, we find that higher capital requirements have a short-lived, negative impact on bank credit in Peru, although this effect becomes statistically insignificant in about half a year. This finding is robust to estimating different specifications to address concerns about the exogeneity of capital requirements. The fact that the reform was gradual and pre-announced and that banks were highly profitable at the time could explain the short-lived effects on credit.
Banks and Banking --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Industries: Financial Services --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Banking --- Monetary economics --- Financial services law & regulation --- Finance --- Bank credit --- Credit --- Countercyclical capital buffers --- Loans --- Money --- Financial institutions --- Financial regulation and supervision --- Capital adequacy requirements --- Banks and banking --- Asset requirements --- Peru
Listing 1 - 9 of 9 |
Sort by
|