Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Large firms pay higher wages. In developing economies, the large-firm wage premium is comparable to the average gap between male and female wages, or two-thirds of the gap between urban and rural wages. There is substantial variation across countries in the share of the premium that is explained by sorting of human capital into large firms. The average large-firm wage premium declines in national income and has declined over time. Across industries, it is highest in public utilities and commerce. These stylized facts suggest several hypotheses about differences between labor markets in developing and advanced economies.
Firm Size --- Gender --- Gender and Economics --- Gender Gap --- Inequality --- Labor Markets --- Poverty Reduction --- Social Protections and Labor --- Wage Gap --- Wage Premium --- Wages, Compensation and Benefits
Choose an application
The 2017 Investment Climate Assessment of Bhutan provides a detailed assessment of firm performance and constraints as they enter, operate, and exit domestic and international markets. The report provides policy recommendations that will support Bhutan to achieve an investment climate conducive to private sector growth, and the creation of productive and gainful employment.
Choose an application
Around the world, women face persistent barriers in seeking to enter the labor force, attain leadership positions, and launch businesses. Gender inequality not only prevents women from achieving their full potential and gaining economic independence, but also inhibits the growth of national economies. In a context of growing global competition for private investment, policymakers face the timely challenge of ensuring that women are not left behind in the development agenda. This working paper identifies and analyzes investment incentives that governments can provide to businesses with the aim of promoting gender equality. Barriers to gender equality in the workplace include supply-side barriers that make it difficult for women to find jobs or investment financing, and demand-side barriers that make it more costly for firms or investors to hire or fund women. The paper discusses three main types of investment incentives that governments may use to address these barriers: (i) subsidies and grants, (ii) tax incentives, and (iii) public procurement incentives. Because incentives run the risk of creating market inefficiencies and leading to redundant outcomes, their use should be carefully conceived and implemented. The effectiveness of these instruments will depend on the underlying constraints to gender equality, the targeted policy goals, implementation features, and the broader enabling environment. Relevant studies and experiences from several countries are used to explore when and how governments might use investment incentives to promote gender equality.
Business Development Services --- Economic Opportunity --- Enterprise Development and Reform --- Female Entrepreneurs --- Female Labor Force Participation --- Gender --- Gender and Development --- Gender and Economic Policy --- Gender and Economics --- Gender and Public Expenditures --- Gender Equality --- Gender Equity --- Government Grants --- Investment Incentives --- Investment Policy --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Microenterprises --- Private Sector Development --- Subsidies --- Taxation and Subsidies
Choose an application
Firms of different sizes play different roles in organized markets and societies. This report focuses on the particular role that larger firms - firms with 100 employees or more - play in this ecosystem. It shows that larger firms in developing countries have distinct features that set them apart from the rest. These features are closely associated with productivity advantages - their ability not only to lower costs of production through economies of scale and scope, but also to invest in quality and reach demand. These distinct features of large firms translate into improved outcomes for their owners as well as for workers and smaller enterprises in their value chains. The fundamental challenge for economic development, however, is that production often does not reach economic scale in low- and middle-income countries. What is missing are larger, more productive, and outward-oriented firms. The scarcity of larger firms raises the question of how they are created in lower income contexts, and where frictions lie in this process. This report shows that four types of sponsors are often behind large firms: foreign firms creating new affiliates; domestic sponsors having experience with other large firms; governments; and entrepreneurs. Growth paths of large firms also show that distinguishing features of large firms are often in place from the time they are established. Therefore, supporting small firms to grow large is one means for creating large firms, but not sufficient on its own. To fill the 'missing top', governments should support the creation of new large firms from different sources, improve market contestability, and address operational barriers that disproportionally affect larger firms. The challenge lies in balancing the desire for efficiency and welfare benefits of large firms, while avoiding the inefficiencies that result when large firms acquire monopoly power. For development finance institutions seeking to promote a dynamic and competitive private sector, taking a value chain perspective and partnering with larger firms in each indutry - both incumbent firms and new challengers - can benefit firms across the size spectrum--
Business enterprises --- Size --- Size. --- Developing countries --- Economic policy.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
This paper provides a comprehensive assessment of the short-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on businesses worldwide with a focus on developing countries. The results are based on a novel data set collected by the World Bank Group and several partner institutions in 51 countries covering more than 100,000 businesses. The paper provides several stylized facts. First, the COVID-19 shock has been severe and widespread across firms, with persistent negative impact on sales. Second, the employment adjustment has operated mostly along the intensive margin (that is leave of absence and reduction in hours), with a small share of firms laying off workers. Third, smaller firms are disproportionately facing greater financial constraints. Fourth, firms are increasingly relying on digital solutions as a response to the shock. Fifth, there is great uncertainty about the future, especially among firms that have experienced a larger drop in sales, which is associated with job losses. These findings provide a better understanding of the magnitude and distribution of the shock, the main channels affecting businesses, and how firms are adjusting. The paper concludes by discussing some avenues for future research.
Bankruptcy and Resolution Of Financial Distress --- Coronavirus --- COVID-19 --- Economic Conditions and Volatility --- Emerging Markets --- Employment --- Employment and Unemployment --- Entrepreneurship --- Firm Performance --- Information and Communication Technology --- Layoffs --- Pandemic Impact --- Private Sector Economics --- Sales Revenue --- Small and Medium Size Enterprise --- Small and Medium Size Enterprises --- Technology Adoption --- Uncertainty
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|