Listing 1 - 10 of 43 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
I examine and document how the Endless Frontier changed the research landscape at universities and how universities responded to the initiative. I show that the agencies it established and funded initially recruited research proposals from faculty and applications from students for fellowships and scholarships. By the 1960s the tables had begun to turn and universities had begun to push for more resources from the federal government for research, support for faculty salary and research assistants and higher indirect costs. The process transformed the relationship between universities and federal funders; it also transformed the relationship between universities and faculty. The university research system that has grown and evolved faces a number of challenges that threaten the health of universities and the research enterprise and have implications for discovery and innovation. Five are discussed in the closing section. They are (1) a proclivity on the part of faculty and funding agencies to be risk averse; (2) the tendency to produce more PhDs than the market for research positions demands; (3) a heavy concentration of research in the biomedical sciences; (4) a continued expansion on the part of universities that may place universities at increased financial risk and (5) a flat or declining amount of federal funds for research.
Choose an application
Choose an application
The beauty of science may be pure and eternal, but the practice of science costs money. And scientists, being human, respond to incentives and costs, in money and glory. Choosing a research topic, deciding what papers to write and where to publish them, sticking with a familiar area or going into something new-the payoff may be tenure or a job at a highly ranked university or a prestigious award or a bump in salary. The risk may be not getting any of that.At a time when science is seen as an engine of economic growth, Paula Stephan brings a keen understanding of the ongoing cost-benefit calculations made by individuals and institutions as they compete for resources and reputation. She shows how universities offload risks by increasing the percentage of non-tenure-track faculty, requiring tenured faculty to pay salaries from outside grants, and staffing labs with foreign workers on temporary visas. With funding tight, investigators pursue safe projects rather than less fundable ones with uncertain but potentially path-breaking outcomes. Career prospects in science are increasingly dismal for the young because of ever-lengthening apprenticeships, scarcity of permanent academic positions, and the difficulty of getting funded.Vivid, thorough, and bold, How Economics Shapes Science highlights the growing gap between the haves and have-nots-especially the vast imbalance between the biomedical sciences and physics/engineering-and offers a persuasive vision of a more productive, more creative research system that would lead and benefit the world.
Science policy --- Sociology of knowledge --- Research --- Science and state. --- Recherche --- Politique scientifique et technique --- Economic aspects. --- Aspect économique --- AA / International- internationaal --- 476 --- 338.6 --- 50 --- education --- enseignement --- recherche et developpement --- Science --- State and science --- State, The --- Economie van de opvoeding. --- Wetenschappelijk onderzoek en ontwikkeling. --- Algemeenheden. Geschiedenis en filosofie van de wetenschappen. --- opvoeding --- onderwijs --- onderzoek en ontwikkeling --- Government policy --- Aspect économique --- Science and state --- Economic aspects --- Wetenschappelijk onderzoek en ontwikkeling --- Economie van de opvoeding --- Algemeenheden. Geschiedenis en filosofie van de wetenschappen
Choose an application
Federal aid to research. --- Federal aid to research --- Sex differences.
Choose an application
FEMMES --- BENEVOLAT --- STATISTIQUE --- CREATION EMPLOIS
Choose an application
Some scholars view academic and industrial science as qualitatively different knowledge production regimes. Others claim that the two sectors are increasingly similar. Large-scale empirical evidence regarding similarities and differences, however, has been missing. Drawing on prior work on the organization of science, we first develop a framework to compare and contrast the two sectors along four key dimensions: (1) the nature of research (e.g., basic versus applied); (2) organizational characteristics (e.g., degree of independence, pay); (3) researchers' preferences (e.g., taste for independence); and (4) the use of alternative disclosure mechanisms (e.g., patenting and publishing). We then compare the two sectors empirically using detailed survey data from a representative sample of over 5,000 life scientists and physical scientists employed in a wide range of academic institutions and private firms. Building on prior work that has emphasized different “research missions”, we also examine how the nature of research is related to other characteristics of science within and across the two sectors. Our results paint a complex picture of academic and industrial science. While we find significant industry-academia differences with respect to all four dimensions, we also observe remarkable similarities. For example, both academic institutions and private firms appear to allow their scientists to stay actively involved in the broader scientific community and provide them with considerable levels of independence in their jobs. Second, we find significant differences not just between industrial and academic science but also within each of the two sectors as well as across fields. Finally, while the nature of research is a significant predictor of other dimensions such as the use of patenting and publishing, it does not fully explain the observed industry-academia differences in those dimensions. Overall, our results suggest that stereotypical views of industrial and academic science may be misleading and that future work may benefit from a richer and more nuanced description of the organization of science.
Choose an application
Economic analysis of law --- Technological innovations --- Research --- Science --- Innovations --- Recherche --- Sciences --- Economic aspects. --- Aspect économique --- Aspect économique
Choose an application
Science policy --- United States --- Ability [Influence of age on ] --- Age and ability --- Age factors in ability --- Aptitude [Influence de l'âge sur l'] --- Bekwaamheid [Invloed van ouderdom op ] --- 001.89 --- Organisatie van wetenschap en wetenschappelijk werk. Wetenschapsbeleid --- 001.89 Organisatie van wetenschap en wetenschappelijk werk. Wetenschapsbeleid --- Ability, Influence of age on --- Creative ability in science --- Scientists --- Scientific creativity --- Science --- Mind and body --- Age and employment --- Methodology --- Scientists - United States. --- Creative ability in science - United States. --- Ability, Influence of age on. --- United States of America
Listing 1 - 10 of 43 | << page >> |
Sort by
|