Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Depression, Mental --- Acupuncture. --- Alternative treatment. --- Counterirritation --- Energy medicine
Choose an application
Depression, Mental --- Meditation --- Alternative treatment. --- Therapeutic use.
Choose an application
The Army Medical Department's Professional Filler System was developed in 1980 to support continuous overseas contingency operations while simultaneously balancing the Army's requirement to maintain a healthy force, deploy a medical force to support military operations, and manage/meet access-to-care demands for all military health system beneficiaries. PROFIS allows health care providers to practice in a military treatment facility when not deployed, which contributes to the maintenance of their medical and technical skills. The PROFIS Deployment System, developed in 2005, is an internal management system that is used to battle roster deploying units with the correct PROFIS personnel so that the U.S. Army Medical Command can plan proactively for deployments. Recently, there have been concerns over how PROFIS affects the medical readiness and availability of providers for training with the unit preparing to deploy. This report describes the functionality of the Army's PROFIS in the current operating environment and assesses potential modifications or improvements to the system. Using a literature review, interviews, a survey, and administrative data, this research sought to identify and understand the effect of PROFIS, and deployments more broadly, on providers and other military personnel. The study also assessed modifications and alternatives to the current PROFIS that might address the identified issues.
Occupational Groups --- Medicine --- Health Occupations --- Persons --- Named Groups --- Disciplines and Occupations --- Military Personnel --- Military Medicine --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Military Administration --- Medicine, Military --- Military --- Air Force Personnel --- Armed Forces Personnel --- Army Personnel --- Coast Guard --- Marines --- Navy Personnel --- Sailors --- Soldiers --- Submariners --- Force Personnel, Air --- Personnel, Air Force --- Personnel, Armed Forces --- Personnel, Army --- Personnel, Military --- Personnel, Navy --- Sailor --- Soldier --- Submariner --- Person --- Health Professions --- Health Occupation --- Health Profession --- Occupation, Health --- Occupations, Health --- Profession, Health --- Professions, Health --- Medical Specialities --- Medical Specialties --- Medical Specialty --- Specialities, Medical --- Specialties, Medical --- Specialty, Medical --- Medical Speciality --- Speciality, Medical --- Group, Occupational --- Groups, Occupational --- Occupational Group --- Military Family --- Occupations --- Military Deployment --- Deployment, Military --- Health Workforce --- Military Health --- Employee --- Employees --- Personnel --- Worker --- Workers --- United States. --- Medical personnel. --- Personnel management. --- U.S. Army --- US Army --- Military planning --- Operational readiness.
Choose an application
The Department of Defense (DoD) has been one of the leaders in actions to improve teamwork, which it has pursued with the goal of achieving safer care and reducing adverse events for patients served by its military hospitals. DoD and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) have worked together to develop tools to improve teamwork in delivering care in order to achieve safer outcomes for patients. In 2004, AHRQ modified its Patient Safety Evaluation Center contract with RAND to add an analytic study to identify and test measures that have the potential to capture improvements in t
Inpatients. --- Military hospitals. --- Outcome Assessment (Health Care). --- Patient Care Team. --- Quality of Health Care. --- Health care teams --- Outcome assessment (Medical care) --- Medicine --- Medical errors --- Organization and Administration --- Outcome Assessment (Health Care) --- Quality of Health Care --- Hospitals, Military --- Patient Care Team --- Medical Errors --- Inpatients --- Biomedical Research --- Patients --- Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) --- Hospitals, Federal --- Patient Care Management --- Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation --- Health Services Administration --- Military Facilities --- Health Services --- Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms --- Hospitals, Public --- Health Care --- Health Care Facilities, Manpower, and Services --- Persons --- Facility Design and Construction --- Research --- Named Groups --- Architecture as Topic --- Science --- Hospitals --- Technology, Industry, and Agriculture --- Health Facilities --- Natural Science Disciplines --- Technology, Industry, Agriculture --- Disciplines and Occupations --- Medical Professional Practice --- Health & Biological Sciences --- Quality control --- Safety measures --- Prevention --- Health care teams. --- Quality control. --- Safety measures. --- Prevention. --- Clinical sciences --- Medical profession --- Assessment of outcome (Medical care) --- Outcome evaluation (Medical care) --- Outcome measures (Medical care) --- Outcomes assessment (Medical care) --- Outcomes measurement (Medical care) --- Outcomes research (Medical care) --- Patient outcome assessment --- Health teams --- Medical care teams --- Patient care teams --- Team work in medicine --- Teamwork in medicine --- Human biology --- Life sciences --- Medical sciences --- Pathology --- Physicians --- Medical care --- Medical cooperation --- Medical personnel --- Evaluation --- Health Workforce
Choose an application
Information on the race and ethnicity of individuals enrolled through the HealthCare.gov Health Insurance Marketplace is critical for assessing past enrollment efforts and determining whether outreach campaigns should be modified or tailored moving forward. However, approximately one-third of insurance applicants do not complete the race and Hispanic ethnicity questions on the Marketplace application. When self-reported race and ethnicity information is missing, other information about an individual can be used to infer race and ethnicity, such as surnames, first names, and addresses, with each characteristic contributing meaningfully to the identification of six mutually exclusive racial and ethnic groups: American Indian (AI)/Alaskan Native (AN); Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI); Black; Hispanic; Multiracial; and White. Surnames are particularly useful for distinguishing people who identify as Hispanic and AANHPI from other racial and ethnic groups. Geocoded address information is particularly useful in distinguishing Black and White individuals who frequently reside in racially segregated neighborhoods. This report presents the results of imputing race and ethnicity for Marketplace enrollees from 2015 through 2022 using the modified Bayesian Improved First Name Surname and Geocoding (BIFSG) method, developed by the RAND Corporation, which uses surnames, first names, and residential addresses to indirectly estimate race and ethnicity.
Choose an application
Frailty is a clinical syndrome that is characterized by a constellation of symptoms, including loss of strength, low energy, and weight loss. According to research, the syndrome is associated with negative health outcomes, such as falls, disability, fractures, and increased risk of mortality. Research has also shown that frailty is associated with increased utilization and spending, independent of other medical risk factors. Identifying and quantifying frailty might be an important component of risk-adjustment for value-based payments or might help target specific interventions. Despite its importance, measuring frailty is challenging because of the lack of consistent measurement of frailty-related concepts. The authors reviewed and refined claims-based algorithms. To identify individuals at greater risk of frailty and functional impairment, they developed new algorithms using Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims that were validated using patient assessment data from two types of post-acute care (PAC) providers: home health agencies (HHAs) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Finally, they compared the relative performance of the new and existing algorithms at predicting three claims-based outcomes in a data set representative of all Medicare FFS beneficiaries. Overall, they found that using algorithms previously developed by Kim and colleagues and reported in a 2018 article performed best for most outcomes and subpopulations, although the new algorithms performed slightly better at predicting a nursing home stay in the following year by some metrics, particularly among PAC patients.
Choose an application
This report describes analytical methodologies, estimates, and technical considerations related to the measurement of health care utilization in Medicare Part C encounter data (ED) submitted by organizations offering Medicare Advantage plans to Medicare beneficiaries. The primary aim of the report is to provide technical details for researchers on the structure and scope of ED and on the methodological steps and analytical decisions necessary to assess utilization of health care services using ED. The authors identify key considerations related to enrollment, differences in ED and Medicare claims data, and decisions that researchers must make about data field selection. From 2015 to 2016, there was a slight decrease in inpatient hospital stays (from 0.231 to 0.225 per enrollee) and a slight increase in professional visits (from 21.095 to 21.292 per enrollee). Outpatient facility visits, emergency department visits, and other outpatient facility visits increased slightly.
Choose an application
"Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) comprises a large number of therapies (e.g., acupuncture and chiropractic) that developed outside the conventional biomedical model of care. About one-third of the general population report using CAM either on their own (e.g., yoga) or through the services of a CAM provider (e.g., massage). While CAM is offered within the military health system, no systemwide data are available on its use. RAND conducted an environmental scan (CAM survey) of military treatment facilities (MTFs) to understand the availability of CAM, the conditions for which CAM is being used, and the types and process of credentialing and privileging of CAM providers. Most MTFs (83 percent) offer CAM services, usually up to eight different types, with relaxation therapy, acupuncture, progressive muscle relaxation, guided imagery, and chiropractic being the most common. Lack of provider availability was the primary reason reported for not offering CAM. These services are most often used for chronic pain, stress, anxiety, and sleep disturbance. There is variability across MTFs and types of CAM in the process and criteria used for credentialing and privileging providers. While most MTFs reported that CAM use is usually documented in a patient's electronic medical record, there was variation in the availability and use of procedure codes. Standardization of CAM coding would allow consistent tracking of CAM providers and use for better manpower management, and easier data collection for future comparison studies. Standardization of CAM provider credentialing and privileging would ensure that providers are properly trained and have clear practice requirements"--
Alternative medicine. --- Medicine, Military --- Complementary Therapies --- Health Services Needs and Demand. --- Military Medicine --- utilization. --- manpower. --- methods. --- United States.
Choose an application
In California's workers' compensation (WC) system, there have been long-standing concerns about the costs and quality of medical care provided to injured workers and the ability of workers to access care. These challenges are not unique to WC and in part reflect the limitations of fee-for-service payment. Alternative payment models (APMs) have been implemented outside WC to rein in costs, discourage overtreatment, and incentivize quality improvement. The California State Legislature has expressed interest in developing pilot programs that could bring APMs into WC in California, and the California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Workers' Compensation (DWC), asked the RAND Corporation to study alternatives to using the California Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS). The authors of this report sought to (1) evaluate potential APMs for use in California WC, (2) examine advantages and disadvantages of each, and (3) make recommendations to the California Legislature on pilot programs for APMs. To do so, the authors conducted a scoping review and an environmental scan of literature on APMs and conducted interviews and focus groups with key WC stakeholders (providers, unions, applicant attorneys, employers, and insurers). The authors considered four APMs: quality incentive programs (such as pay-for-performance and value-based payment programs), bundled payments, accountable care organizations, and global budgets. Stakeholders most consistently supported exploring the implementation of a pay-for-performance pilot program for California WC. The authors recommend that DWC use a two-stage process to develop a pilot pay-for-performance program that aims to increase provider participation in WC and improve injured worker's access to WC care.
Choose an application
Value-based purchasing (VBP) refers to a broad set of performance-based payment strategies that link financial incentives to health care providers' performance on a set of defined measures in an effort to achieve better value. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is advancing the implementation of VBP across an array of health care settings in the Medicare program in response to requirements in the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and policymakers are grappling with many decisions about how best to design and implement VBP programs so that they are successful in achieving stated goals. This report summarizes the current state of knowledge about VBP programs, focusing on pay-for-performance programs, accountable care organizations, and bundled payment programs. The authors discuss VBP program goals and what constitutes success; the evidence on the impact of these programs; factors that characterize high- and low-performing providers in VBP programs; the measures, incentive structures, and benchmarks used by VBP programs; evidence on spillover effects and unintended consequences; and gaps in the knowledge base. The report concludes with a set of recommendations for the design, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation of VBP programs and a discussion of HHS's efforts in this regard.
Medical care --- Government purchasing --- Health services administration --- Health care reform --- Medicare. --- Purchasing --- Management.
Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|