Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Social change --- Sociological theories --- 316.42 --- Social change. Sociale ontwikkeling. Sociale veranderingen. Modernisering. Evolutie .Sociale revolutie. Modernisme --- Functionalism (Social sciences) --- Social change. --- Social evolution. --- 316.42 Social change. Sociale ontwikkeling. Sociale veranderingen. Modernisering. Evolutie .Sociale revolutie. Modernisme --- Functionalism (Social sciences). --- Social evolution --- Cultural evolution --- Cultural transformation --- Culture, Evolution of --- Culture --- Evolution --- Change, Social --- Cultural change --- Societal change --- Socio-cultural change --- Social history --- Functional analysis (Social sciences) --- Structural-functional analysis (Social sciences) --- Ethnology --- Social sciences --- Social systems --- Philosophy --- Changement social --- Fonctionnalisme (sciences sociales) --- Évolution sociale

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109 CE), in his work Proslogion, originated the "ontological argument" for God's existence, famously arguing that "something than which nothing greater can be conceived," which he identifies with God, must actually exist, for otherwise something greater could indeed be conceived. Some commentators have claimed that although Anselm may not have been conscious of the fact, the Proslogion as well as his Reply to Gaunilo contains passages that constitute a second independent proof: a "modal ontological argument" that concerns the supposed logical necessity of God's existence. Other commentators disagree, countering that the alleged second argument does not stand on its own but presupposes the conclusion of the first. Anselm's Other Argument stakes an original claim in this debate, and takes it further. There is a second a priori argument in Anselm (specifically in the Reply), A. D. Smith contends, but it is not the modal argument past scholars have identified. This second argument surfaces in a number of forms, though always turning on certain deep, interrelated metaphysical issues. It is this form of argument that in fact underlies several of the passages which have been misconstrued as statements of the modal argument. In a book that combines historical research with rigorous philosophical analysis, Smith discusses this argument in detail, finally defending a modification of it that is implicit in Anselm. This "other argument" bears a striking resemblance to one that Duns Scotus would later employ.

God --- Ontology. --- Modality (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Being --- Philosophy --- Metaphysics --- Necessity (Philosophy) --- Substance (Philosophy) --- Misotheism --- Theism --- Proof, Ontological --- Anselm, --- Anselm --- Anselmus Cantuariensis --- Anselme d'Aoste --- Anselme de Cantorbéry --- Anselmus van Canterbury --- Anselm of Canterbury --- Anselmus --- Anselmus, --- Anzelm, --- Anselmo, --- Anselme, --- Ansèlm, --- Anshelmus, --- God - Proof, Ontological - Early works to 1800 --- Ontology --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109 --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109. - Proslogion

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Labour economics

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Employees --- Employees --- Occupational retraining --- Reconversion professionnelle --- Transfer. --- Dismissal of.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)