Listing 1 - 10 of 20 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
This report assesses interventions for improving dietary habits and/or increasing physical activity. It is the second review about effects of interventions for different socioeconomic groups. Objective The objectives were to assess the effects of the following interventions: 1 to improve dietary habits among different socio-economic groups, 2 to improve dietary habits in lower socio-economic groups, 3 to increase physical activity among different socioeconomic groups, and 4 to increase physical activity in lower socio-economic groups. Methods We searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in international databases, and appraised and synthesized studies which fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Results We summarized results from five systematic reviews and 14 randomized controlled trials. The documentation does not allow us to conclude about an effect/no effect in any of the target groups. Conclusion We identified few randomized controlled trials of high methodological quality. The systematic reviews that we found were mostly of low quality, and only a small minority of the selected studies in the reviews included randomized trials focusing on socioeconomic differences.
Choose an application
The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (now part of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health) was commissioned to update the evidence on the effect of intravenous thrombolytic treatment administered 3 to 4.5 hours after stroke. There was already a Cochrane systematic review by Wardlaw et al. from 2014. We searched for systematic reviews published after Wardlaw's review, but found none that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Then we searched for randomised controlled trials published later than the search date for the Cochrane review, but we found no relevant trials. We have, therefore, conveyed the findings from Wardlaw and supplemented with data from an individual patient data meta-analysis. We have also graded our confidence in the estimates of effect using the GRADE tool (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The outcomes are assessed 3-6 months after the stroke and are compared with placebo. We found that intravenous thrombolysis administered 3 to 4.5 hours after onset of ischemic stroke gives: 1. Uncertain effect on the outcome "alive and independent" (very low quality/confidence) 2. A positive effect on the outcome "alive with no functional impairment" (moderate quality/confidence) 3. Between 37 fewer and 36 more per 1000 in risk of death (low quality/confidence) 4. Uncertain risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (very low quality/confidence).
Thrombolytic therapy. --- Cerebrovascular disease --- Treatment.
Choose an application
The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (now part of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health) was commissioned to update the evidence on the effect of intravenous thrombolytic treatment administered 3 to 4.5 hours after stroke. There was already a Cochrane systematic review by Wardlaw et al. from 2014. We searched for systematic reviews published after Wardlaw's review, but found none that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Then we searched for randomised controlled trials published later than the search date for the Cochrane review, but we found no relevant trials. We have, therefore, conveyed the findings from Wardlaw and supplemented with data from an individual patient data meta-analysis. We have also graded our confidence in the estimates of effect using the GRADE tool (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The outcomes are assessed 3-6 months after the stroke and are compared with placebo. We found that intravenous thrombolysis administered 3 to 4.5 hours after onset of ischemic stroke gives: 1. Uncertain effect on the outcome "alive and independent" (very low quality/confidence) 2. A positive effect on the outcome "alive with no functional impairment" (moderate quality/confidence) 3. Between 37 fewer and 36 more per 1000 in risk of death (low quality/confidence) 4. Uncertain risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (very low quality/confidence).
Thrombolytic therapy. --- Cerebrovascular disease --- Treatment.
Choose an application
Choose an application
This report assesses interventions for improving dietary habits and/or increasing physical activity. It is the second review about effects of interventions for different socioeconomic groups. Objective The objectives were to assess the effects of the following interventions: 1 to improve dietary habits among different socio-economic groups, 2 to improve dietary habits in lower socio-economic groups, 3 to increase physical activity among different socioeconomic groups, and 4 to increase physical activity in lower socio-economic groups. Methods We searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in international databases, and appraised and synthesized studies which fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Results We summarized results from five systematic reviews and 14 randomized controlled trials. The documentation does not allow us to conclude about an effect/no effect in any of the target groups. Conclusion We identified few randomized controlled trials of high methodological quality. The systematic reviews that we found were mostly of low quality, and only a small minority of the selected studies in the reviews included randomized trials focusing on socioeconomic differences.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Dietary supplements --- Schizophrenia --- Evaluation. --- Complications.
Choose an application
After a stroke, many patients lose parts of their visual field. It is common to lose half of the visual field (right or left) on both eyes. Interventions that have been tried include regaining (parts of) the visual field (restitution), compensate for the visual field defect by changing behavior and activities (compensation), or finding replacements for the visual defect by using aids (substitution). We have included 10 studies (6 on compensation, 2 on substitution, and 2 on restitution). Conclusion At the present time, the evidence for effect of interventions for visual field defects is mostly of very low quality, and the effects are uncertain. An exception involves compensational strategies for which there may be positive effects on visual search, reading and abilities to perform daily activities (ADL).
Stroke. --- Vision disordersx --- Etiology.
Listing 1 - 10 of 20 | << page >> |
Sort by
|