Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Motivated by the literature on the capital asset pricing model, we decompose the uncertainty of a typical forecaster into common and idiosyncratic uncertainty. Using individual survey data from the Consensus Forecasts over the period of 1989-2014, we develop monthly measures of macroeconomic uncertainty covering 45 countries and construct a measure of global uncertainty as the weighted average of country-specific uncertainties. Our measure captures perceived uncertainty of market participants and derives from two components that are shown to exhibit strikingly different behavior. Common uncertainty shocks produce the large and persistent negative response in real economic activity, whereas the contributions of idiosyncratic uncertainty shocks are negligible.
Banks and Banking --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Industries: General --- Employment --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Business Fluctuations --- Cycles --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Finance --- Labour --- income economics --- Industrial production --- Short term interest rates --- Long term interest rates --- Unemployment rate --- Consumption --- Production --- Financial services --- National accounts --- Interest rates --- Industries --- Economics --- United States --- Income economics
Choose an application
Many countries face the challenge of raising additional tax revenues without hurting economic growth. Comprehensive, cross-country information on the revenue impact of tax policy changes can thus support informed decision-making on viable reforms. We assess the likely revenue impact of various tax policy changes based on a sample of 21 advanced and emerging market economies, using granular information from the IMF Tax Policy Reform Database v.4.0. Our findings suggest that the revenue yield of a tax policy change varies significantly depending on the tax instrument adopted (e.g., VAT or personal income tax) and the nature of the change (i.e., rate, base). For example, in our sample, base-broadening changes to personal and corporate income taxes as well as to excise and property taxes have generally a more significant and long-lasting revenue yields than rate changes. By contrast, rate changes appear to have a relatively more significant revenue impact in the case of VAT and social security contributions. We also observe an asymmetry in the revenue impact of most tax policy measures when controlling for the direction of tax changes (i.e., its significance varies depending on whether taxes are increased or decreased). While our results are based on qualitative information of tax policy changes (i.e., dummy variables), the revenue yields of rate measures are not materially different from those that would be obtained using quantitative information on the size of the change.
Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Public Finance --- Taxation --- Corporate Taxation --- Personal Finance -Taxation --- Fiscal Policy --- Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies --- Business Taxes and Subsidies --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Public finance & taxation --- Corporate & business tax --- Revenue administration --- Corporate income tax --- Taxes --- Personal income tax --- Tax collection --- Value-added tax --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Revenue --- Corporations --- Income tax --- Tax administration and procedure --- Spendings tax --- United States
Choose an application
Many countries face the challenge of raising additional tax revenues without hurting economic growth. Comprehensive, cross-country information on the revenue impact of tax policy changes can thus support informed decision-making on viable reforms. We assess the likely revenue impact of various tax policy changes based on a sample of 21 advanced and emerging market economies, using granular information from the IMF Tax Policy Reform Database v.4.0. Our findings suggest that the revenue yield of a tax policy change varies significantly depending on the tax instrument adopted (e.g., VAT or personal income tax) and the nature of the change (i.e., rate, base). For example, in our sample, base-broadening changes to personal and corporate income taxes as well as to excise and property taxes have generally a more significant and long-lasting revenue yields than rate changes. By contrast, rate changes appear to have a relatively more significant revenue impact in the case of VAT and social security contributions. We also observe an asymmetry in the revenue impact of most tax policy measures when controlling for the direction of tax changes (i.e., its significance varies depending on whether taxes are increased or decreased). While our results are based on qualitative information of tax policy changes (i.e., dummy variables), the revenue yields of rate measures are not materially different from those that would be obtained using quantitative information on the size of the change.
United States --- Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Public Finance --- Taxation --- Corporate Taxation --- Personal Finance -Taxation --- Fiscal Policy --- Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies --- Business Taxes and Subsidies --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Public finance & taxation --- Corporate & business tax --- Revenue administration --- Corporate income tax --- Taxes --- Personal income tax --- Tax collection --- Value-added tax --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Revenue --- Corporations --- Income tax --- Tax administration and procedure --- Spendings tax
Choose an application
Stock prices and workplace mobility trace out striking clockwise paths in daily data from mid-February to late May 2020. Global stock prices fell 30 percent from 17 February to 12 March, before mobility declined. Over the next 11 days, stocks fell another 10 percentage points as mobility dropped 40 percent. From 23 March to 9 April, stocks recovered half their losses and mobility fell further. From 9 April to late May, both stocks and mobility rose modestly. This dynamic plays out across the 35 countries in our sample, with notable departures in China, South Korea, and Taiwan. The size of the global stock market crash in reaction to the pandemic is many times larger than a standard asset-pricing model implies. Looking more closely at the world's two largest economies, the pandemic had greater effects on stock market levels and volatilities in the U.S. than in China even before it became evident that early U.S. containment efforts would flounder. Newspaper-based narrative evidence confirms the dominant - and historically unprecedented - role of pandemic-related developments in the stock market behavior of both countries.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|