Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Literature --- Canon (Literature) --- Canon (Literatuur) --- Canons littéraires --- Literaire canon --- 82.0 --- 87 --- Literatuurtheorie --- Klassieke literatuur --- History and criticism. --- 87 Klassieke literatuur --- 82.0 Literatuurtheorie --- Canon (Literature). --- Appraisal of books --- Books --- Evaluation of literature --- Criticism --- Literary style --- Classics, Literary --- Literary canon --- Literary classics --- Best books --- History and criticism --- Appraisal --- Evaluation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Imprisonment in literature. --- Prisoners --- Russian fiction --- Books and reading --- Study and teaching. --- History and criticism. --- Grossman, Vasiliĭ --- Levinas, Emmanuel --- Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, --- Criticism and interpretation.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

China --- Greece --- Chine --- Grèce --- Civilization --- Civilisation --- S12/0820 --- China: Philosophy and Classics--Comparative philosophy --- Grèce

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This edited volume employs the paradoxical notion of ‘anticipatory plagiarism’—developed in the 1960s by the ‘Oulipo’ group of French writers and thinkers—as a mode for reading Russian literature. Reversing established critical approaches to the canon and literary influence, its contributors ask us to consider how reading against linear chronologies can elicit fascinating new patterns and perspectives. Reading Backwards: An Advance Retrospective on Russian Literature re-assesses three major nineteenth-century authors—Gogol, Dostoevsky and Tolstoy—either in terms of previous writers and artists who plagiarized them (such as Raphael, Homer, or Hall Caine), or of their own depredations against later writers (from J.M. Coetzee to Liudmila Petrushevskaia). Far from suggesting that past authors literally stole from their descendants, these engaging essays, contributed by both early-career and senior scholars of Russian and comparative literature, encourage us to identify the contingent and familiar within classic texts. By moving beyond rigid notions of cultural heritage and literary canons, they demonstrate that inspiration is cyclical, influence can flow in multiple directions, and no idea is ever truly original. This book will be of great value to literary scholars and students working in Russian Studies. The introductory discussion of the origins and context of ‘plagiarism by anticipation’, alongside varied applications of the concept, will also be of interest to those working in the wider fields of comparative literature, reception studies, and translation studies.

Literature Slavic --- Russian literature --- classics --- anticipatory plagiarism --- Tolstoy --- Gogol --- comparative literature --- cultural heritage --- Russian Studies --- nineteenth-century literature