Listing 1 - 10 of 25 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Why did Western European states agree to the enlargement of the EU and NATO? Frank Schimmelfennig analyzes the history of the enlargement process and develops a theoretical approach of 'rhetorical action' to explain why it occurred. While rationalist theory explains the willingness of East European states to join the NATO and EU, it does not explain why member states decided to admit them. Using original data, Schimmelfennig shows that expansion to the East can be understood in terms of liberal democratic community building. Drawing on the works of Jon Elster and Erving Goffman, he demonstrates that the decision to expand was the result of rhetorical action. Candidates and their supporters used arguments based on collective identity, norms and values of the Western community to shame opponents into acquiescing to enlargement. This landmark book makes an enormous contribution to theory in international relations and to the study of European politics.
National security --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- Membership. --- Europe --- Economic integration. --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- NAVO --- OTAN --- 341.2422 --- #SBIB:327.7H21 --- #SBIB:327.7H32 --- Ontwikkeling van de Europese Unie (historische en toekomstige evolutie) --- Bondgenootschappen: NAVO / NATO --- NATO --- Sécurité nationale --- Intégration économique --- International relations. Foreign policy --- Polemology --- European Union --- Economic integration --- Social Sciences --- Political Science --- National security - Europe --- Europe - Economic integration --- UNION EUROPEENNE --- VIE INTERNATIONALE --- RELATIONS EXTERIEURES --- PESC --- PESD --- POLITIQUE DE SECURITE --- ELARGISSEMENT --- ORGANISATIONS INTERGOUVERNEMENTALES
Choose an application
This volume describes and explains the development of international parliamentary institutions and asks why international organizations establish parliamentary institutions without, however, granting them relevant decision-making powers.
International agencies --- International organization. --- Legislative bodies. --- Management. --- Federation, International --- Global governance --- Interdependence of nations --- International administration --- International federation --- Organization, International --- World federation --- World government --- World order --- World organization --- Congresses and conventions --- International relations --- Peace --- Political science --- International cooperation --- Security, International --- World politics --- Associations, International --- IGOs (Intergovernmental organizations) --- Institutions, International --- Inter-governmental organizations --- Intergovernmental organizations --- International associations --- International governmental organizations --- International institutions --- International organizations --- International unions --- Organizations, International --- Specialized agencies of the United Nations --- Interorganizational relations --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- International organization --- Bicameralism --- Legislatures --- Parliaments --- Unicameral legislatures --- Constitutional law --- Estates (Social orders) --- Representative government and representation --- Legislative bodies --- International cooperation. --- Decision making. --- Decision-making in political science
Choose an application
La pandémie de Covid-19 renforce les crises d'intégration que l'Union européenne a connues au cours de la dernière décennie. Le choc asymétrique de la pandémie exacerbe les écarts existants en matière de performance économique et de santé budgétaire entre les États membres du Nord et du Sud de l'Europe et exerce de nouvelles pressions sur la cohésion de la zone euro.Les fermetures unilatérales des frontières en réaction à la propagation du virus ont perturbé l'espace Schengen, dont la cohérence avait déjà été mise à mal en 2015, par un accroissement des flux migratoires. Enfin, la pandémie a frappé pendant la phase cruciale des négociations sur les relations économiques post-Brexit entre l'Union et le Royaume-Uni. Le principe de « conditions de concurrence équitables » au cœur du marché intérieur n'est pas seulement mis à l'épreuve, mais il est également menacé par la suspension des règles de l'Union en matière d'aides d'État. Dans tous ces domaines touchés par la crise, les réformes étaient dans l'impasse avant la pandémie - la question est de savoir si le choc du Covid-19 débloquera les négociations ou réduira davantage la marge de manœuvre pour les accords à venir.Dans une Union de plus en plus hétérogène et contestée, l'intégration différenciée a considérablement facilité l'approfondissement et l'élargissement de l'intégration européenne.Elle a été particulièrement efficace pour lancer l'intégration de nouvelles politiques et l'admission de nouveaux États membres. La différenciation est toutefois moins adaptée pour relever les principaux défis actuels de l'Union européenne : la révision et la réforme des politiques hautement intégrées qui sont en crise. Pour illustrer les difficultés liées à l'intégration différenciée, cette note applique les principales connaissances théoriques et empiriques tirées d'expériences passées d'intégration différenciée, aux domaines de la politique de l'Union les plus touchés par la crise et faisant l'objet d'un besoin de réforme : la zone euro, Schengen et le Brexit.
Choose an application
EU external democracy promotion has traditionally been based on 'linkage', i.e. bottom-up support for democratic forces in third countries, and 'leverage', i.e. the top-down inducement of political elites towards democratic reforms through political conditionality. The advent of the European Neighbourhood Policy and new forms of association have introduced a new, third model of democracy promotion which rests in functional cooperation between administrations. This volume comparatively defines and assesses these three models of external democracy promotion in the EU's relations with its eastern and southern neighbours. It argues that while 'linkage' has hitherto failed to produce tangible outcomes, and the success of 'leverage' has basically been tied to an EU membership perspective, the 'governance' model of democracy promotion bears greater potential beyond the circle of candidate countries.This third approach, while not tackling the core institutions of the political system as such, but rather promoting transparency, accountability, and participation at the level of state administration, may turn out to remain the EU's most tangible form of democratic governance promotion in the future. This book was originally published as a special issue of Democratization.
Democratization. --- Démocratisation --- European Union. --- European Neighbourhood Policy (Program) --- European Union countries --- Pays de l'Union européenne --- Foreign relations --- Relations extérieures --- Democracy --- Democratization --- European Union --- #SBIB:327.7H233 --- #SBIB:324H60 --- #SBIB:324H71 --- Democratic consolidation --- Democratic transition --- Political science --- New democracies --- Europese Unie: externe relaties, buitenlands- en defensiebeleid (ook WEU) --- Politieke socialisatie --- Politieke verandering: modernisatie, democratisering, regional development --- European Neighborhood Policy (Program) --- ENP --- European Commission. --- Politique européenne de voisinage (Program) --- PEV --- Politica Europeană de Vecinătate (Program) --- European Neighbourhood Policy (Program). --- Démocratisation --- Pays de l'Union européenne --- Relations extérieures --- Democracy - European Union countries --- European Union countries - Foreign relations --- European Union countries - Foreign relations - 21st century
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Research designs can be distinguished along various dimensions, but all face the same set of core issues. What is a relevant research problem? How can the concepts and measurements be improved? Which and how many variables and cases should be selected? What theoretical conclusions can be drawn from the research? Which evidence would lead to a rejection and reformulation of the initial theory? This volume was written to help advanced students of political science and neighbouring fields to think about these issues and develop practical solutions for their own research. The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research can often be inadequate. Some solutions to research design problems are common to both types of research; others cross-cut the traditional qualitative-quantitative divide. Including a chapter on choosing a research question, this book provides practical guidelines for both qualitative and quantitative designs, discussing the typical trade-offs involved in choosing them, and is rich in examples from real research.
Choose an application
Differentiated integration has become a durable feature of the European Union and is a major alternative for its future development and reform. This book provides a comprehensive conceptual, theoretical, and empirical analysis of differentiation in European integration. It explains differentiation in EU treaties and legislation in general and offers specific accounts of differentiation in the recent enlargements of the EU, the Eurozone crisis, the Brexit negotiations, and the integration of non-member states. Ever Looser Union? introduces differentiated integration as a legal instrument that European governments use regularly to overcome integration deadlock in EU treaty negotiations and legislation. Differentiated integration follows two main logics. Instrumental differentiation adjusts integration to the heterogeneity of economic preferences and capacities, particularly in the context of enlargement. By contrast, constitutional differentiation accommodates concerns about national self-determination. Whereas instrumental differentiation mainly affects poorer (new) member states, constitutional differentiation offers wealthier and nationally oriented member states opt-outs from the integration of core state powers. The book shows that differentiated integration has facilitated the integration of new policies, new members, and even non-members. It has been mainly 'multi-speed' and inclusive. Most differentiations end after a few years and do not discriminate against member states permanently. Yet differentiation is less suitable for reforming established policies, managing disintegration and fostering solidarity, and the path-dependency of core state power integration may lead to permanent divides in the Union
Choose an application
#SBIB:327.7H230 --- #SBIB:328H27 --- Europese Unie: beleid: algemeen --- Instellingen en beleid: Midden- en Centraal Europa: algemeen --- European Union --- E.U. --- Europe, Central --- Europe, Eastern --- Central Europe --- Economic conditions. --- Economic integration. --- Politics and government --- Economic conditions
Choose an application
Authors Schimmelfennig and Winzen offer a comprehensive account and assessment of differentiation in European integration, including an analysis of differentiation in EU enlargement, the Eurozone crisis, Brexit and the selective integration of non-member states.
European Union. --- European Union countries --- Europe --- Politics and government. --- E.U. --- Politics
Listing 1 - 10 of 25 | << page >> |
Sort by
|