Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Climate change is intensifying food insecurity across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) with lasting adverse macroeconomic effects, especially on economic growth and poverty. Successive shocks from the war in Ukraine and COVID-19 pandemic have increased food prices and depressed incomes, raising the number of people suffering from high malnutrition and unable to meet basic food consumption needs by at least 30 percent to 123 million in 2022 or 12 percent of SSA's population. Addressing the lack of resilience to climate change--that critically underlies food insecurity in SSA--will require careful policy prioritization against a backdrop of financing and capacity constraints. This paper presents some key considerations and examples of tradeoffs and complementarities across policies to address food insecurity. Key findings include (1) Fiscal policies focused on social assistance and efficient public infrastructure investment can improve poorer households' access to affordable food, facilitate expansion of climate-resilient and green agricultural production, and support quicker recovery from adverse climate events; (2) Improving access to finance is key to stepping up private investment in agricultural resilience and productivity as well as improving the earning capacity and food purchasing power of poorer rural and urban households; and (3) Greater regional trade integration, complemented with resilient transport infrastructure, enables sales of one country's bumper harvests to its neighbors' facing shortages. The international community can help with financial assistance--especially for the above-mentioned social assistance and key infrastructure areas--capacity development, and facilitating transfers of technology and know-how.
Choose an application
Niger’s exposure to recurrent shocks, including climate shocks, increases its vulnerability to food insecurity. This paper aims to quantify the combined effects of climate shocks and food insecurity on key economic variables and identify the most effective mitigation policy responses using a general equilibrium model. Results indicate that rural households would be the most affected by a climate shock resulting in a decline in domestic agricultural production, which would reduce their consumption, erode their capital, and thus increase urban-rural inequalities. Simulations show that cash transfers and the reduction of internal mobility costs appear to be more effective in mitigating the impact on households of a climate shock on agricultural production.
Money and Monetary Policy --- International Economics --- Macroeconomics --- Environmental Economics --- Agriculture & Food Policy --- Monetary Policy --- International Agreements and Observance --- International Organizations --- General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium: General --- Agricultural Policy --- Food Policy --- Climate --- Natural Disasters and Their Management --- Global Warming --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Monetary economics --- International institutions --- Climate change --- Poverty & precarity --- Monetary policy --- International organization --- Consumption --- National accounts --- Environment --- Food security --- Poverty --- Income --- International agencies --- Economics --- Climatic changes --- Niger
Choose an application
Niger’s exposure to recurrent shocks, including climate shocks, increases its vulnerability to food insecurity. This paper aims to quantify the combined effects of climate shocks and food insecurity on key economic variables and identify the most effective mitigation policy responses using a general equilibrium model. Results indicate that rural households would be the most affected by a climate shock resulting in a decline in domestic agricultural production, which would reduce their consumption, erode their capital, and thus increase urban-rural inequalities. Simulations show that cash transfers and the reduction of internal mobility costs appear to be more effective in mitigating the impact on households of a climate shock on agricultural production.
Niger --- Money and Monetary Policy --- International Economics --- Macroeconomics --- Environmental Economics --- Agriculture & Food Policy --- Monetary Policy --- International Agreements and Observance --- International Organizations --- General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium: General --- Agricultural Policy --- Food Policy --- Climate --- Natural Disasters and Their Management --- Global Warming --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Monetary economics --- International institutions --- Climate change --- Poverty & precarity --- Monetary policy --- International organization --- Consumption --- National accounts --- Environment --- Food security --- Poverty --- Income --- International agencies --- Economics --- Climatic changes
Choose an application
Climate change is intensifying food insecurity across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) with lasting adverse macroeconomic effects, especially on economic growth and poverty. Successive shocks from the war in Ukraine and COVID-19 pandemic have increased food prices and depressed incomes, raising the number of people suffering from high malnutrition and unable to meet basic food consumption needs by at least 30 percent to 123 million in 2022 or 12 percent of SSA’s population. Addressing the lack of resilience to climate change—that critically underlies food insecurity in SSA—will require careful policy prioritization against a backdrop of financing and capacity constraints. This paper presents some key considerations and examples of tradeoffs and complementarities across policies to address food insecurity. Key findings include (1) Fiscal policies focused on social assistance and efficient public infrastructure investment can improve poorer households’ access to affordable food, facilitate expansion of climate-resilient and green agricultural production, and support quicker recovery from adverse climate events; (2) Improving access to finance is key to stepping up private investment in agricultural resilience and productivity as well as improving the earning capacity and food purchasing power of poorer rural and urban households; and (3) Greater regional trade integration, complemented with resilient transport infrastructure, enables sales of one country’s bumper harvests to its neighbors’ facing shortages. The international community can help with financial assistance—especially for the above-mentioned social assistance and key infrastructure areas—capacity development, and facilitating transfers of technology and know-how.
Food intolerance. --- Agribusiness --- Agricultural commodities --- Agricultural economics --- Agricultural industries --- Agricultural Policy --- Agricultural sector --- Agriculture & Food Policy --- Agriculture: Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis --- Agriculture: General --- Climate change --- Climate --- Climatic changes --- Commodities --- Economic sectors --- Economics --- Environment --- Environmental Economics --- Farm produce --- Food Policy --- Food prices --- Food security --- Global Warming --- International agencies --- International Agreements and Observance --- International Economics --- International institutions --- International organization --- International Organizations --- Investment & securities --- Investments: Commodities --- Macroeconomics --- Natural Disasters and Their Management --- Political Economy --- Political economy --- Poverty & precarity --- Poverty --- Prices --- Public Policy --- Kenya
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|