Listing 1 - 10 of 99 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
This paper analyses the role of social safety nets in the form of redistributional transfers and wage subsidies. It is argued that public welfare programs can be viewed as a crime-preventing or disruption-preventing devices because they tend to increase the opportunity cost of engaging in crime or disruptive activities. It is shown that, in the presence of a leisure choice, wage subsidies may be better than pure transfers. Using a simple growth model, the optimal size of the public welfare program is found and it is argued that public welfare should be financed with income (not lump-sum) taxes, despite the fact that income taxes are distortionary. The intuition for this result is that income taxes act as a user fee on congested public goods and transfers can be thought of as productive public goods subject to congestion. Finally, using a cross-section of 75 countries, the partial correlation between transfers and growth is shown to be significantly positive.
Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Criminology --- Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Labor Economics Policies --- National Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs --- Social Security and Public Pensions --- National Security and War --- Crime & criminology --- Labour --- income economics --- Crime --- Personal income --- Income inequality --- Consumption --- Employment subsidies --- National accounts --- Crime--Economic aspects --- Income --- Income distribution --- Economics --- Manpower policy --- United States
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 99 | << page >> |
Sort by
|