Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
331.881 (091) --- 331-05 --- vakbeweging, geschiedenis --- arbeiders - werknemers - arbeiderswereld - arbeidersproblemen - arbeidersvraagstukken (zie ook 331.88, 331.881) --- Income distribution --- Labor movement --- Labor unions --- Minorities --- Industrial unions --- Labor, Organized --- Labor organizations --- Organized labor --- Trade-unions --- Unions, Labor --- Unions, Trade --- Working-men's associations --- Societies --- Central labor councils --- Guilds --- Syndicalism --- Labor and laboring classes --- Social movements --- Political activity --- Social conditions
Choose an application
From workers' wages to presidential elections, labor unions once exerted tremendous clout in American life. In the immediate post-World War II era, one in three workers belonged to a union. The fraction now is close to one in five, and just one in ten in the private sector. The only thing big about Big Labor today is the scope of its problems. While many studies have explained the causes of this decline, What Unions No Longer Do shows the broad repercussions of labor's collapse for the American economy and polity. Organized labor was not just a minor player during the middle decades of the twentieth century, Jake Rosenfeld asserts. For generations it was the core institution fighting for economic and political equality in the United States. Unions leveraged their bargaining power to deliver benefits to workers while shaping cultural understandings of fairness in the workplace. What Unions No Longer Do details the consequences of labor's decline, including poorer working conditions, less economic assimilation for immigrants, and wage stagnation among African-Americans. In short, unions are no longer instrumental in combating inequality in our economy and our politics, resulting in a sharp decline in the prospects of American workers and their families.
Income distribution -- United States. --- Labor movement -- United States. --- Labor unions -- Political activity -- United States. --- Minorities -- United States -- Social conditions. --- Labor movement --- Income distribution --- Labor unions --- Minorities --- Business & Economics --- Labor & Workers' Economics --- Political activity --- Social conditions --- Social conditions. --- Industrial unions --- Labor, Organized --- Labor organizations --- Organized labor --- Trade-unions --- Unions, Labor --- Unions, Trade --- Working-men's associations --- Labor and laboring classes --- Societies --- Central labor councils --- Guilds --- Syndicalism --- Social movements --- E-books
Choose an application
"Setting wages isn't an exact science, but we like to think that our workplace performance provides an objective basis for pay. You're Paid What You're Worth offers a bold theory to the contrary, arguing that pay is decided in contests over interests and ideals-that social conflicts, not economic metrics, determine who gets how much"--
Pay equity --- Equality --- Performance standards --- Wages and labor productivity --- Merit pay --- Annual improvement factor --- Labor productivity and wages --- Wages --- Industrial engineering --- Labor productivity --- Productivity bargaining --- Job performance standards --- Work performance standards --- Work standardization --- Employees --- Goal setting in personnel management --- Egalitarianism --- Inequality --- Social equality --- Social inequality --- Political science --- Sociology --- Democracy --- Liberty --- Comparable worth --- Equal pay for comparable work --- Equal pay for work of comparable value --- Equity, Pay --- Worth, Comparable --- Rating of --- Merit increases --- Merit pay programs --- Merit pay systems --- Merit-type salary schedules --- Pay for performance --- Salary schedules, Merit-type --- Variable pay --- Performance awards --- #SBIB:316.334.2A330 --- #SBIB:316.334.2A340 --- #SBIB:316.334.2A60 --- #SBIB:316.334.2A520 --- Arbeidssociologie: regionale arbeidsmarktstudies --- Arbeidssociologie: ongelijkheden op de arbeidsmarkt: algemeen --- Economische sociologie --- Organisatiesociologie: arbeidssituatie en arbeidsomstandigheden: algemeen
Choose an application
A myth-busting book challenges the idea that we’re paid according to objective criteria and places power and social conflict at the heart of economic analysis.Your pay depends on your productivity and occupation. If you earn roughly the same as others in your job, with the precise level determined by your performance, then you’re paid market value. And who can question something as objective and impersonal as the market? That, at least, is how many of us tend to think. But according to Jake Rosenfeld, we need to think again.Job performance and occupational characteristics do play a role in determining pay, but judgments of productivity and value are also highly subjective. What makes a lawyer more valuable than a teacher? How do you measure the output of a police officer, a professor, or a reporter? Why, in the past few decades, did CEOs suddenly become hundreds of times more valuable than their employees? The answers lie not in objective criteria but in battles over interests and ideals. In this contest four dynamics are paramount: power, inertia, mimicry, and demands for equity. Power struggles legitimize pay for particular jobs, and organizational inertia makes that pay seem natural. Mimicry encourages employers to do what peers are doing. And workers are on the lookout for practices that seem unfair. Rosenfeld shows us how these dynamics play out in real-world settings, drawing on cutting-edge economics, original survey data, and a journalistic eye for compelling stories and revealing details.At a time when unions and bargaining power are declining and inequality is rising, You’re Paid What You’re Worth is a crucial resource for understanding that most basic of social questions: Who gets what and why?
Choose an application
Setting wages isn't an exact science, but we like to think that our workplace performance provides an objective basis for pay. You're Paid What You're Worth offers a bold theory to the contrary, arguing that pay is decided in contests over interests and ideals--that social conflicts, not economic metrics, determine who gets how much.
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|