Listing 1 - 10 of 11 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Over the last decade, Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programs have become one of the most widely adopted anti-poverty initiatives in the developing world. Inspired particularly by Mexico's successful program, CCTs are viewed as an effective way to provide basic income support while building children's human capital. These programs have had a remarkable global expansion, from a handful programs in the late 1990s to programs in close to 30 countries today, including a demonstration program in the United States. In contrast to many other safety net programs in developing countries, CCTs have been closely studied and well evaluated, creating both a strong evidence base from which to inform policy decisions and an active global community of practice. This paper first reviews the emergence of CCTs in the context of a key theme in welfare reform, notably using incentives to promote human capital development, going beyond the traditional focus on income support. The paper then examines what has been learned to date from the experience with CCTs in the South and raises a series of questions concerning the relevance and replicability of these lessons in other contexts. The paper concludes with a call for further knowledge sharing in two areas: between the North and South as the experience with welfare reform and CCTs in particular expands, and between behavioral science and welfare policy.
Accounting --- Asylum --- Cash Transfers --- Child Labor --- Cost-Effectiveness --- Decision Making --- Developing Countries --- Economic Costs --- Economics --- Equity --- Family Health --- Finance --- Health Monitoring & Evaluation --- Health Outcomes --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Human Capital --- Human Trafficking --- Immigration --- Incentives --- Income Inequality --- Income Poverty --- Income Redistribution --- Inequality --- International Cooperation --- International Food Policy Research Institute --- International Law --- Knowledge --- Labor Market --- Labor Policies --- Marketing --- Means Testing --- Migration --- Nutrition --- Political Economy --- Poverty --- Poverty Reduction --- Productivity --- Public Policy --- Refugees --- Respect --- Risk --- Risk Management --- Rural Development --- Rural Poverty --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Savings --- School Attendance --- Severance Pay --- Social Development --- Social Insurance --- Social Protections and Labor --- Unemployment --- Urban Areas --- Vulnerable Groups --- Women
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Using a case study approach, this comparative review examines the operational arrangements of child-focused accompanying measures in nutrition and parenting from 19 cash transfer programs. It covers both family-focused cash transfer programs for households with children, and public works programs that have incorporated accompanying measures largely in response to the need for childcare among beneficiaries. The accompanying measures reviewed include: incentives for pregnant women, parents and caregivers to use available supply-side services; the direct provision of child focused goods and services as part of the cash transfer program; and behavioral interventions for parents and caregivers to build knowledge and inform choices and parenting practices. As context for the operational case study approach, the note includes a theory of change and brief review of the available evidence on cash transfer programs' impact on young children's development. The note also provides a set of operational lessons learned and a -'forward look' to inform program design and future research.
Cash Transfers --- Early Child and Children's Health --- Early Childhood Development --- Education --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Labor Policies --- Nutrition --- Poverty Reduction --- Social Protections and Assistance --- Social Protections and Labor
Choose an application
Development aid. Development cooperation --- Community development --- Economic assistance, Domestic --- Evaluation --- Anti-poverty programs --- Government economic assistance --- Economic policy --- National service --- Grants-in-aid --- Regional development --- Social planning --- Citizen participation --- Government policy
Choose an application
Choose an application
The main focus of the social protection and labor portfolio is on strengthening client's institutional capacity in the design and implementation of programs, but projects are not well equipped to track progress in this area. Correspondingly, there is a need to strengthen approaches to measuring and monitoring a 'missing middle' of service delivery, precisely those areas for which counterpart institutions are responsible during the course of a project. In particular, better measures of the primary functions of social protection and labor agencies are needed, such as identifying and enrolling beneficiaries, targeting, payment systems, fraud and error control, performance monitoring of service delivery providers, responsiveness to citizens, transparency, efficiency, management information systems and monitoring and evaluation systems. New World Bank initiatives particularly standard core indicators by sector and the introduction of results based investment lending call for substantial improvements in the use of monitoring and evaluation (M&E). Impact evaluations are included in about half of projects and should continue to be used selectively and strategically, particularly when the program is innovative, replicable and/ or scalable to reach a broader set of beneficiaries, addresses a knowledge gap and is likely to have a substantial policy impact. Structuring evaluations around core themes with common outcome measures is fundamental to building a global knowledge base on development effectiveness.
Access to Education --- Audits --- Baseline Data --- Beneficiary Assessments --- Capacity Building --- Cash Transfers --- Citizen Report Cards --- Communities --- Community Empowerment --- Corruption --- Customization --- Data Collection --- Development Policy --- Financial Management --- Flexibility --- Fraud --- Gender --- Household Surveys --- Housing & Human Habitats --- International Law --- Knowledge Sharing --- Means Testing --- Mobility --- Natural Disasters --- Nongovernmental Organizations --- Poverty Monitoring & analysis --- Poverty Reduction --- Productivity --- Project Management --- Public Sector --- Savings --- Severance Pay --- Social Accountability --- Social Development --- Social Insurance --- Social Protections and Labor --- Social Safety Nets --- Social Security System --- Statistical analysis --- Technical Assistance --- Transparency --- Unemployment --- Villages --- Vulnerable Groups --- Youth
Choose an application
This paper evaluates the effects of interventions based on behavioral science on measures of early childhood socio-cognitive development (and related household-level outcomes) for children from households receiving cash transfers in Madagascar, using a multi-arm cluster-randomized trial. Three behavioral interventions (a Mother Leaders group and associated activities, by itself or augmented with a self-affirmation or a plan-making nudge) are layered onto a child-focused cash transfer program targeting children from birth to age six years. Approximately 18 months into the implementation of these interventions and 20 months since baseline, the study finds evidence that households in the behaviorally enhanced arms undertake more desirable parenting behaviors, interact more with their children, prepare more (and more diverse) meals at home, and report lower food insecurity than households that received only cash. Children from households in several of the behaviorally enhanced arms also perform better than children from households in the cash-only arm on several measures of socio-cognitive development, including language learning and social skills.
Choose an application
This paper assesses how household context and characteristics shape the welfare trajectory and more specifically the accumulation of productive assets among beneficiaries of the Vision 2020 Umurenge Programme in Rwanda, the government's flagship social assistance program. The analysis is based on a unique data set combining panel household survey data with in-depth qualitative interviews of a subsample of male and female beneficiaries from the survey data collected between 2009 and 2015. By combining quantitative and qualitative information, the paper draws a more nuanced picture of how household characteristics-structural and temporal-contextualize opportunities for poor men and women and their households and shape how well they can leverage access to the Vision 2020 Umurenge Programme to accumulate productive assets. The mixed method analysis reveals that household composition, gender power dynamics, disability, care responsibilities, marital arrangements, intrahousehold communication, and access to other social programs and institutions play a crucial role in access to the Vision 2020 Umurenge Programme and related asset accumulation. The findings suggest that households would benefit from a broader definition of the eligibility criteria and the availability of flexible and complementary programming, to reap the benefits of the income transfer received from the program.
Disability --- Economics and Gender --- Gender --- Gender and Economic Policy --- Gender and Economics --- Gender and Poverty --- Household Context --- Inequality --- Labor Markets --- Labor Policies --- Livestock and Animal Husbandry --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Mixed Method Analysis --- Rural Development --- Rural Labor Markets --- Social Protection
Listing 1 - 10 of 11 | << page >> |
Sort by
|