Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Behavior, Animal --- Animal, Domestic --- Domestic animals --- Animal behavior --- Animaux domestiques --- Animaux --- Behavior --- Moeurs et comportement --- Animal domestique --- domestic animals --- Animal de zoo --- Zoo animals --- Animal de compagnie --- pet animals --- Animal sauvage --- wild animals --- Domestication --- Captivité --- captivity --- Comportement --- Behaviour --- Apprentissage --- Learning --- Animal --- animals --- Bien-être animal --- animal welfare --- Communication animale --- Communication between animals --- 594 --- diergedrag --- ethologie (lt) --- Animals, Domestic. --- Veterinary ethology --- Animals --- Animals, Habits and behavior of --- Ethology --- Animal psychology --- Zoology --- Ethologists --- Psychology, Comparative --- Behavior, Animal. --- Behavior, animal --- Bonding, human-pet --- Behavior therapy --- Human-Animal Bond. --- Behavior Therapy. --- Human-Animal Bond --- Behavior Therapy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Sir Edwin Chadwick (1800 - 1890) is hardly a household name among economists, although he is a well-known hero to sanitation engineers and utilitarian social reformers. His brilliant and cunning ideas relating to contemporary economic policy are illuminated for the first time in this pioneering study. The authors detail Chadwick's sophisticated conceptions of moral hazard, common pool problems, asymmetric information, and theory of competition, all of which differ starkly from those promulgated by Adam Smith and other classical economists. Also examined are Chadwick's views on government versu

Classical school of economics. --- Incentives in industry. --- Chadwick, Edwin, --- 1800 - 1899 --- Great Britain.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Economic schools --- Chadwick, Edwin --- GB / United Kingdom - Verenigd Koninkrijk - Royaume Uni --- 08 --- 330.40 --- Biografieën en memoires --- Geschiedenis van het economisch en sociaal denken

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Two experiments were conducted on pigs and beef cattle to study whether or not regular exposure to either humans or novel objects resulted in stimulus-specific or generalised behavioural responses. Groups of pigs and cattle were allocated to one of three treatments: regular brief exposure to either (1) an experimenter handling the animals in a positive manner (Human treatment) or (2) three novel objects (Novel Object treatment) and (3) minimal contact with humans and novel objects (Minimal treatment). After 4 weeks of treatment, the behavioural responses of the animals to humans and novel objects were studied. Pigs in the Human treatment were quicker (P < 0.01) to physically interact with the experimenter in the Human Approach Tests than pigs in the other two treatments, Pigs in the Human treatment were also quicker (P < 0.05) to closely approach the experimenter than pigs in the Novel Object treatment. Cattle in the Human treatment spent more time (P < 0.05) close to the experimenter in the Human Approach Tests than cattle in the other two treatments. Furthermore, cattle in the Human treatment were also quicker(P < 0.01) to closely approach the experimenter than cattle in the Minimal treatment, Pigs in the Human treatment were quicker (P < 0.01) to approach within 0.5 m of the novel stimulus in the Novel Object Approach Tests than pigs in the Minimal treatment and there was a tendency for pigs in the Novel Object treatment to approach the novel stimulus more rapidly (P < 0.07) than pigs in the Minimal treatment. The approach behaviour of cattle to the novel object in the Novel Object Approach Tests was similar for the three treatments. The results of these experiments provide evidence that changes in the behavioural response of animals undergoing regular positive handling by humans is stimulus specific to humans. Furthermore, there was some evidence that the behavioural response of pigs, but not cattle, to the novel stimulus was affected by previous exposure

Animal. --- Animals. --- Behaviour. --- Boxes. --- Cattle. --- Chicks fear. --- Consequences. --- Contact. --- Corticosteroids. --- Domestic pigs. --- Experience. --- Experiment. --- Experiments. --- Exposure. --- Fearful behaviour. --- Fowl. --- Group. --- Growth. --- Handling. --- Hens. --- Human-animal relationships. --- Human-beings. --- Human. --- Humans. --- Novelty. --- Object. --- Objects. --- Pig. --- Pigs. --- Productivity. --- Response. --- Responses. --- Stimuli. --- Stimulus. --- Test. --- Tests. --- Time. --- Treatment.