Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The methods to select safety net beneficiaries are the subject of frequent policy debates. This paper presents the results from a randomized experiment analyzing how efficiency, legitimacy, and short-term program effectiveness vary across widely used targeting methods. The experiment was embedded in the roll-out of a national cash transfer program in Niger. Eligible villages were randomly assigned to have beneficiary households selected through community-based targeting, a proxy-means test, or a formula designed to identify the food-insecure. Proxy-means testing is found to outperform other methods in identifying households with lower consumption per capita. The methods perform similarly against other welfare benchmarks. Legitimacy is high across all methods, but local populations have a slight preference for formula-based approaches. Manipulation and information imperfections are found to affect community-based targeting, although triangulation across multiple selection committees mitigates the related risks. Finally, short-term program impacts on food security are largest among households selected by proxy-means testing. Overall, the differences in performance across targeting methods are small relative to the overall level of exclusion stemming from limited funding for social programs.

Access of Poor to Social Services --- Agriculture --- Cash Transfers --- Demographics --- Disability --- Economic Assistance --- Field Experiment --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Inequality --- Livestock & Animal Husbandry --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Poverty --- Poverty Reduction --- Safety Nets --- Services & Transfers to Poor --- Social Protections & Assistance --- Social Protections and Labor --- Targeting

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Conflict undermines development, while poverty, in turn, breeds conflict. Policy interventions such as cash transfers could lower engagement in conflict by raising poor households' welfare and productivity. However, cash transfers may also trigger appropriation or looting of cash or assets. The expansion of government programs may further attract attacks to undermine state legitimacy. To investigate the net effect across these forces, this paper studies the impact of cash transfers on conflict in Niger. The analysis relies on the large-scale randomization of a government-led cash transfer program among nearly 4,000 villages over seven years, combined with geo-referenced conflict events that draw on media and nongovernmental organization reports from a wide variety of international and domestic sources. The findings show that cash transfers did not result in greater pacification but-if anything-triggered a short-term increase in conflict events, which were to a large extent driven by terrorist attacks by foreign rebel groups (such as Boko Haram) that could have incentives to "sabotage" successful government programs.

Terrorism.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Evaluations of employment programs usually focus on direct impacts on participants. Yet employment programs can have a range of indirect effects that are rarely quantified. This paper analyzes the impact of a subsidized apprenticeship program offering dual on-the-job and theoretical training in Cote d'Ivoire. The experiment simultaneously randomized whether apprenticeship positions opened by firms were filled by the program, and whether interested youths were assigned to a formal apprenticeship. This design allows for estimating direct impacts on youths and indirect impacts on firms selected to host apprentices. The analysis identifies whether individuals forgo other employment or training opportunities, and whether firms replace other workers with program participants. The share of youths in apprenticeships increased by 52.8 percentage points. This estimate accounts for a significant windfall effect: 26 percent of the formal apprentices who were placed substituted out of traditional apprenticeships. The inflow of apprentices into firms increased significantly, but also induced substitution effects, as firms hired 0.23 fewer traditional apprentices per formal apprentice placed. Overall, the net number of apprenticeship positions created was between 51 and 74 percent of the number of formal apprentices placed. In the short term, impacts on earnings were not significant for youths, but firms benefited from an increase in the net value of work provided by apprentices.

Apprenticeship --- Direct Effects --- Education --- Employment --- Employment and Unemployment --- Equilibrium Effects --- Field Experiment --- Indirect Effects --- International Economics and Trade --- International Trade and Trade Rules --- Skills Development and Labor Force Training --- Small Enterprises --- Social Protections and Labor --- Training --- Vocational and Technical Education --- Vocational Education and Technical Training --- Wage Subsidy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

While climate change is likely to increase weather risks in many developing countries, there is little evidence on effective policies to facilitate adaptation. This paper presents experimental evidence on a program in rural Nicaragua aimed at improving households' risk-management through income diversification. The intervention targeted agricultural households exposed to weather shocks related to changes in rainfall and temperature patterns. It combined a conditional cash transfer with vocational training or a productive investment grant. The authors identify the relative impact of each complementary package based on randomized assignment, and analyze how impacts vary by exposure to exogenous drought shocks. The results show that both complementary interventions provide full protection against drought shocks two years after the end of the intervention. Households that received the productive investment grant also had higher average consumption levels. The complementary interventions led to diversification of economic activities and better protection from shocks compared to beneficiaries of the basic conditional cash transfer and control households. These results show that combining safety nets with productive interventions can help households manage future weather risks and promote longer-term program impacts.

Adaptation --- Cash transfers --- Climate change --- Diversification --- Drought --- Gender --- Housing & Human Habitats --- Poverty Reduction --- Productive investment --- Randomized experiment --- Regional Economic Development --- Risk --- Risk-management --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Safety Nets and Transfers --- Vocational training --- Welfare --- Nicaragua.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

While climate change is likely to increase weather risks in many developing countries, there is little evidence on effective policies to facilitate adaptation. This paper presents experimental evidence on a program in rural Nicaragua aimed at improving households' risk-management through income diversification. The intervention targeted agricultural households exposed to weather shocks related to changes in rainfall and temperature patterns. It combined a conditional cash transfer with vocational training or a productive investment grant. The authors identify the relative impact of each complementary package based on randomized assignment, and analyze how impacts vary by exposure to exogenous drought shocks. The results show that both complementary interventions provide full protection against drought shocks two years after the end of the intervention. Households that received the productive investment grant also had higher average consumption levels. The complementary interventions led to diversification of economic activities and better protection from shocks compared to beneficiaries of the basic conditional cash transfer and control households. These results show that combining safety nets with productive interventions can help households manage future weather risks and promote longer-term program impacts.

Adaptation --- Cash transfers --- Climate change --- Diversification --- Drought --- Gender --- Housing & Human Habitats --- Poverty Reduction --- Productive investment --- Randomized experiment --- Regional Economic Development --- Risk --- Risk-management --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Safety Nets and Transfers --- Vocational training --- Welfare --- Nicaragua.