Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Angels --- Language and languages --- Language --- Religious aspects --- Christianity --- Judaism --- 235 --- Engelen. Demonen. Heiligen --- Foreign languages --- Languages --- Angelology --- Cherubim --- Cherubs (Spirits) --- Divine messengers --- Seraphim --- Angels (Judaism) --- Religious aspects&delete& --- Anthropology --- Communication --- Ethnology --- Information theory --- Meaning (Psychology) --- Philology --- Linguistics --- Spirits --- Christianity and language --- Angels - Language --- Language and languages - Religious aspects - Christianity --- Language and languages - Religious aspects - Judaism --- Angels - Judaism

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier."-- This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier

Synoptic problem. --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- 226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Marco (Book of the New Testament) --- Mark (Book of the New Testament) --- Markus (Book of the New Testament) --- Markusevangelium --- Vangelo di Marco --- Book of Mark