Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This study finds that natural shocks-storms in particular-are a significant and often leading cause for power supply disruptions. This finding is based on 20 years of high frequency (i.e. daily) data on power outages and climate variables in 28 countries-Bangladesh, the United States and 26 European countries. More specifically: (1) Natural shocks are the most important cause of power outages in developed economies. On average, they account for more than 50 of annual outage duration in both the US and Europe. In contrast, natural shocks are responsible for a small share of outages in Bangladesh, where disruptions occur on a daily basis for a variety of reasons. (2) Outages due to natural shocks are found to last significantly longer than those due to non-natural shocks in-e.g. more than 4.5 times in Europe. Reasons include the challenge of locating wide-spread damages, and the sustained duration of storms. (3) Several factors can reinforce the adverse effect of natural shocks on power supply. In the US, forest cover is shown to significantly increase the risk of power outages when storms occur. (4) There are significant differences in network fragility. For instance, wind speeds above 35 km/h are found to be 12 times more likely to cause an outage in Bangladesh than in the US. This difference may be explained by a range of factors, including investments in infrastructure resilience and maintenance.

Climate Change Impacts --- Electric Power --- Electricity --- Energy --- Energy and Environment --- Energy Policies and Economics --- Environment --- Infrastructure Economics --- Infrastructure Economics and Finance --- Infrastructure Investment --- Natural Disaster --- Natural Disasters --- Power Outage --- Resilient Infrastructure

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This review examines the literature on the welfare impacts of infrastructure disruptions. There is widespread evidence that households suffer from the consequences of a lack of infrastructure reliability, and that being connected to the grid is not sufficient to close the infrastructure gap. Disruptions and irregular service have adverse effects on household welfare, due to missed work and education opportunities, and negative impact on health. Calibrating costs of unreliable infrastructure on existing willingness to pay assessments, we estimate the welfare losses associated with blackouts and water outages. Overall, between 0.1 and 0.2 percent of GDP would be lost each year because of unreliable infrastructure-electricity, water and transport.

Access to Energy --- Access to Water --- Drinking Water --- Electric Power --- Energy --- Energy and Poverty Alleviation --- Energy Policies and Economics --- Household Welfare --- Households --- Inequality --- Infrastructure --- Infrastructure Economics --- Infrastructure Economics and Finance --- Infrastructure Reliability --- Living Standards --- Natural Disaster --- Poverty Reduction --- Power Outage --- Resilient Infrastructure --- Vulnerability --- Water Supply and Sanitation Economics --- Well-Being

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Dar es Salaam is frequently affected by severe flooding causing destruction and impeding daily life of its 4.5 million inhabitants. The focus of this paper is on the role of poverty in the impact of floods on households, focusing on both direct (damage to or loss of assets or property) and indirect (losses involving health, infrastructure, labor, and education) impacts using household survey data. Poorer households are more likely to be affected by floods; directly affected households are more likely female-headed and have more insecure tenure arrangements; and indirectly affected households tend to have access to poorer quality infrastructure. Focusing on the floods of April 2018, affected households suffered losses of 23 percent of annual income on average. Surprisingly, poorer households are not over-represented among the households that lost the most - even in relation to their income, possibly because 77 percent of total losses were due to asset losses, with richer households having more valuable assets. Although indirect losses were relatively small, they had significant well-being effects for the affected households. It is estimated that households' losses due to the April 2018 flood reached more than USD 100 million, representing between 2-4 percent of the gross domestic product of Dar es Salaam. Furthermore, poorer households were less likely to recover from flood exposure. The report finds that access to finance play an important role in recovery for households.

Agriculture --- Climate Change and Agriculture --- Climate Change Impact --- Climate Resilience --- Disaster Risk Management --- Environment --- Flood --- Flood Control --- Flood Risk --- Hazard Risk Management --- Household Welfare --- Hydrology --- Inequality --- Natural Disasters --- Poverty --- Poverty Reduction --- Vulnerability