Listing 1 - 10 of 12 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
In Brennan and Democracy, a leading thinker in U.S. constitutional law offers some powerful reflections on the idea of "constitutional democracy," a concept in which many have seen the makings of paradox. Here Frank Michelman explores the apparently conflicting commitments of a democratic governmental system where key aspects of such important social issues as affirmative action, campaign finance reform, and abortion rights are settled not by a legislative vote but by the decisions of unelected judges. Can we--or should we--embrace the values of democracy together with constitutionalism, judicial supervision, and the rule of law? To answer this question, Michelman calls into service the judicial career of Supreme Court Justice William Brennan, the country's model "activist" judge for the past forty years. Michelman draws on Brennan's record and writings to suggest how the Justice himself might have understood the judiciary's role in the simultaneous promotion of both democratic and constitutional government. The first chapter prompts us to reflect on how tough and delicate an act it is for the members of a society to attempt living together as a people devoted to self-government. The second chapter seeks to renew our appreciation for democratic liberal political ideals, and includes an extensive treatment of Brennan's judicial opinions, which places them in relation to opposing communitarian and libertarian positions. Michelman also draws on the views of two other prominent constitutional theorists, Robert Post and Ronald Dworkin, to build a provocative discussion of whether democracy is best conceived as a "procedural" or a "substantive" ideal.
Choose an application
Frank I. Michelman explains why constitutional debates persist in modern day democracies. Through the lens of John Rawls' seminal work 'Political Liberalism', Michelman responds to the problems governments of constitutional-democratic societies face from deep-lying disagreement among citizens by presenting them with Rawls' solution: an accepted constitution.
Constitutional law --- Liberalism. --- Legitimacy of governments. --- Philosophy. --- Political aspects. --- Rawls, John, --- Governments, Legitimacy of --- Legitimacy (Constitutional law) --- Consensus (Social sciences) --- Revolutions --- Sovereignty --- State, The --- General will --- Political stability --- Regime change --- Liberal egalitarianism --- Liberty --- Political science --- Social sciences --- Constitutional limitations --- Constitutionalism --- Constitutions --- Limitations, Constitutional --- Public law --- Administrative law --- Interpretation and construction --- Roljŭ, J., --- Rōruzu, Jon,
Choose an application
Choose an application
"Legitimation by constitution" is a phrase coined by Michelman and Ferrara to represent an idea in Rawlsian political liberalism of reliance on a dualist democracy: ground-level laws are subject to the constraints of a legal constitution that all citizens, across the political spectrum, can accept as a framework for their collective politics.
Constitutional law. --- Constitutional law --- Constitutional limitations --- Constitutionalism --- Constitutions --- Limitations, Constitutional --- Public law --- Administrative law --- Interpretation and construction
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Constitutional law --- Civil rights --- Human rights --- Democracy --- Michelman, Frank I., --- Michelman, Frank Isaac,
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 12 | << page >> |
Sort by
|