Listing 1 - 10 of 15 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
An assessment of technologies, tactics and operational concepts being considered for future army rapid-reaction forces in the USA. It focuses on small-scale contingency and the associated spectrum of challenges that this type of scenario might entail.
Armored vehicles, Military. --- Armored vehicles, Military - United States. --- Combat. --- Combat - Technological innovations. --- Military planning. --- Tank warfare. --- Tank warfare - Technological innovations. --- United States. --- Small-scale contingencies --- Brigade Combat Teams --- Future Combat System --- U.S. Army --- US Army --- Armored vehicles, Military --- Combat --- Tank warfare --- Military planning --- Antitank warfare --- Tank tactics --- War --- Fighting --- Military combat --- Dueling --- Wager of battle --- Armored military vehicles --- Combat vehicles --- Vehicles, Armored (Military science) --- Mechanization, Military --- Tanks (Military science) --- Vehicles, Military --- Technological innovations.
Choose an application
One of the central elements of the U.S. Army's emerging multidomain operations capabilities is the deployment of a suite of advanced long-range strike weapons. The Army envisions that these new weapons will be highly responsive and synchronized with other joint capabilities. Because of the range of these new Army weapons, there will be major implications for joint coordination and planning. To help address these integration and control challenges, the Army is developing a new organization, a Theater Fires Command (TFC). TFCs would function within the joint force construct and would have the ability to provide very long-range Army fires that could contribute to the joint force objectives and could complement the other services' attack assets at their full range of operations. The authors conclude that different theaters will pose different challenges to a future TFC. Depending on the particular circumstances within a theater of operation, the TFC may have to take on a different shape and size to maximize its utility and potential contribution. For example, in Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), emphasis would have to be placed on longer-range weapons within units that have relatively smaller footprints; whereas in European Command (EUCOM), emphasis might best be placed on high volumes of shorter-range systems. If these challenges can be overcome, and if appropriate operating locations can be established, the TFC will provide a unique and complementary ground-attack capability at the level of the joint force commander.
Choose an application
Researchers created a framework for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to determine suitability and structuring of joint activities. The framework consists of a decision aid that incorporates the factors that should be considered when forming joint programs and collaborations, a taxonomy of five types of joint programs along the jointness spectrum, a notional tool for selecting program type, and recommendations for structuring joint programs to increase the likelihood of their success. Joint programs have been initiated for various reasons, and they are not new to the government acquisition process. Congress has the authority to mandate joint program formation and has sometimes done so for the U.S. Department of Defense. Congress could mandate joint program formation in DHS in the future, and Components could benefit from being prepared in the event of congressional mandate. In addition, DHS leadership could mandate joint program formation, or the Joint Requirements Council could recommend engaging in joint activities. Joint program formation has been used to reduce cross-Component rivalry, and joint programs are often intended to improve cost-effectiveness across programs, both during the acquisition process and throughout the life cycle of a system or capability when acquisition needs are aligned. Beyond cost savings, there are other reasons for pursuing joint programs.
Choose an application
Deployment (Strategy) --- Military doctrine --- Access denial (Military science) --- Operational art (Military science) --- World politics --- Asymmetric warfare --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Military Science - General --- Colonialism --- Global politics --- International politics --- Political history --- Operational level of war --- Anti-access (Military science) --- Denial of access (Military science) --- Doctrine, Military --- History --- Military art and science --- Political science --- World history --- Eastern question --- Geopolitics --- International organization --- International relations --- Strategy --- Defensive (Military science) --- Military policy --- United States. --- Anti-access threats and strategies (Military science) --- Area denial (Military science) --- U.S. Army --- US Army
Choose an application
This documented briefing summarizes a fast-response research effort that directly supported the Defense Science Board Summer Study Task Force on Tactics and Technology for 21st Century Military Superiority. This research examined the effectiveness of small dispersed force concepts, defined by the Defense Science Board, as they might be employed on a future battlefield. RAND's Arroyo Center was one of several organizations to provide analytic support to this study. The Arroyo Center's primary contribution focused on the higher end of the threat spectrum--small dispersed forces against attacking armor--representative of an early-entry phase of a larger conflict. The authors employed a fairly extensive simulation environment to provide analytic-based assessments. Their work in this area continues to evolve as the research provides new insights and raises new questions.
Tactics --- Weapons systems --- Computer simulation. --- United States. --- Weapons systems. --- United States --- Military policy.
Choose an application
This document summarizes the initial year's work on the project "Assessing Advanced Concepts and Technologies for the Army After Next (AAN)." At the request of TRADOC, Deputy Chief of Staff for Doctrine (DCSDOC), RAND Arroyo Center initiated this project about halfway into FY97. The overall intent of the effort was to provide force-on-force simulation-based analytic support to the AAN initiative and support the series of wargames. The effort involves the use of high-resolution constructive simulation to explore both operational concepts and technology options for the light battle force concept associated with the AAN initiative. One of the key capabilities required of the light battle force is an ability to hide and wait for the right opportunity and then create a "virtual ambush," resulting in a shock or disintegration of the enemy. This kind of defeat, to some extent, is in contrast to more traditional attrition in that it greatly compresses the time in which lethality occurs. Essentially, the concept envisions allowing an advancing threat to penetrate, after which the battle force unleashes massive simultaneous fires from afar and closer in. To accomplish this, unprecedented amounts of survivability (possibly in the form of stealth) and lethality (in the form of precsion guided weapons) would be required. Thus, as a starting point, the project examined those two critical aspects of the light battle force concept via our simulation and modeling.
Choose an application
This study presents an alternative to continued reliance on close combat urban operations paradigms that require a commitment of large numbers of soldiers to urban operations. It largely focuses on combat operations, but is also applicable to serving objectives inherent during stability missions.
Street fighting (Military science). --- Urban warfare. --- Urban warfare --- Street fighting (Military science)
Choose an application
Explores and assesses selected technology options for future dismounted soldiers that could improve mission effectiveness and reduce casualties. This monograph summarizes a quick-response analysis done for the 2001 Army Science Board Summer Study on Objective Force Soldier.
Choose an application
Unified operations (Military science) --- Operational art (Military science) --- Military research --- Target acquisition. --- Tactics. --- Command and control systems --- United States --- Military policy.
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 15 | << page >> |
Sort by
|