Listing 1 - 9 of 9 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression contains a complete documentation of the fifteen years of negotiations which led up to the historic adoption of the amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court at the 2010 Review Conference in Kampala. Arranged chronologically, it includes all relevant official Chairman's drafts, non-papers, country proposals, meeting reports and summary records, as well as selected unpublished materials and transcripts from the dramatic negotiations at the Review Conference. Three introductory articles, each written from the perspective of an insider, put the Kampala compromise into context and explore the amendments on the crime of aggression, their negotiation history and the intentions of the drafters.
Choose an application
The 2010 Kampala Amendments to the Rome Statute empowered the International Criminal Court to prosecute the 'supreme crime' under international law: the crime of aggression. This landmark commentary provides the first analysis of the history, theory, legal interpretation and future of the crime of aggression. As well as explaining the positions of the main actors in the negotiations, the authoritative team of leading scholars and practitioners set out exactly how countries have themselves criminalized illegal war-making in domestic law and practice. In light of the anticipated activation of the Court's jurisdiction over this crime in 2017, this work offers, over two volumes, a comprehensive legal analysis of how to understand the material and mental elements of the crime of aggression as defined at Kampala. Alongside The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge, 2011), this commentary provides the definitive resource for anyone concerned with the illegal use of force.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Necessity and proportionality hold a firm place in the international law governing the use of force by states, as well as in the law of armed conflict. However, the precise contours of these two requirements are uncertain and controversial. The aim of Necessity and Proportionality in International Peace and Security Law is to explore how necessity and proportionality manifest themselves in the modern world under the law governing the use of force and the law of armed conflict, and how they relate to each other. The book explores the ways in which necessity and proportionality are applied in practice and addresses pressing legal issues in the law on the use of force, including the controversial "unwilling and unable" test for the use of force in self-defense, drones and targeted killing, the application of this legal regime during civil war, and the need for further transparency in states' justification for the use of force in self-defense. The analysis of the role of military necessity within the law of armed conflict on the modern battlefield focuses on the history and nature of the principle of military necessity, the proper application of the principle of proportionality, how commanders should account for mental harm in calculating proportionality, and the role artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons systems may play in proportionality analysis. The book concludes with a discussion of the potential role of proportionality in the law governing post-conflict contexts
Choose an application
Criminal law. Criminal procedure --- Criminal jurisdiction --- International crimes --- Crimes, International --- International crime --- International offenses --- Crime --- Conflict of criminal jurisdiction --- Conflict of laws --- Criminal law --- Criminal procedure --- Exterritorial crime --- Jurisdiction --- International criminal law --- International Criminal Court. --- International Tribunal for Rwanda. --- International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991. --- International Tribunal to Adjudicate War Crimes Committed in the Former Yugoslavia --- International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia --- International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia --- Tribunal pénal international pour l'Ex-Yougoslavie --- ICTY --- TPIY --- Tribunal international chargé de poursuivre les personnes présumées responsables de violations graves du droit international humanitaire commises sur le territoire de l'ex-Yougoslavie depuis 1991 --- Međunarodni trubunal za suđenje licima odgovornim za teške povrede međunarodnog humanitarnog prava na teritoriji bivše Jugoslavije od 1991. godine --- Haški tribunal --- United Nations. --- Hague Tribunal --- Internationaler Strafgerichtshof in Den Haag --- Haiya shen pan --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ tribunal po byvsheĭ I︠U︡goslavii --- MTBI︠U︡ --- Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals --- U.N. International Criminal Court --- ICC --- CPI --- Cour pénale internationale --- Corte Penal Internacional --- Internationella brottmålsdomstolen --- Pengadilan Pidana Internasional --- Kokusai Keiji Saibansho --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ ugolovnyĭ sud --- Međunarodni kazneni sud --- Międzynarodowy Trybunał Karny --- Maḥkamat al-Jināʼīyah al-Duwalīyah --- Guo ji xing shi fa yuan --- 国际刑事法院 --- Samnakngān ʻAyakān Sān ʻĀyā Rawāng Prathēt --- Tribunal Penal Internacional --- ICTR (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda) --- International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994 --- International Tribunal for Rwanda --- International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States --- Rwanda Tribunal --- TPIR (Tribunal for Rwanda) --- Tribunal pénal international chargé de juger les personnes présumées responsables d'actes de génocide ou d'autres violations graves du droit international humanitaire commis sur le territoire du Rwanda et les citoyens rwandais présumés responsables de tels actes ou violations commis sur le territoire d'états voisins entre le 1er janvier et le 31 décembre 1994 --- Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda --- Urukiko Nshinjabyaha Mpuzamahanga rwagenewe u Rwanda --- United Nations --- Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi --- UCM --- International Criminal Court for Rwanda --- Droit international pénal. --- Tribunaux criminels internationaux. --- Criminal jurisdiction. --- International crimes. --- Cour pénale internationale. --- Tribunal international pour le Rwanda. --- Tribunal pénal international pour l'ex-Yougoslavie. --- International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. --- Droit pénal international. --- Crime organisé. --- Cour pénale internationale. --- Tribunal pénal international pour l'ex-Yougoslavie. --- War crimes --- Criminal procedure (International law) --- Jurisdiction (International law) --- Procédure pénale (droit international) --- Crimes de guerre. --- Droit international pénal. --- Juridiction (droit international) --- Droit pénal international. --- Procédure pénale (droit international)
Choose an application
Choose an application
There are legal limits on the circumstances under which states may use military force to address a perceived or actual threat. The concepts of necessity and proportionality are central to these limitations imposed by the law. This text explores the many ways in which necessity and proportionality arise in the law on the modern battlefield, which is rapidly changing, complex, and ambiguous.
War (International law) --- Intervention (International law) --- Necessity (International law) --- Proportionality in law. --- Law --- International law --- Military intervention --- Diplomacy --- Neutrality --- Hostilities
Choose an application
L'objectif de cet ouvrage, issu du colloque du 30 septembre 2016 en Grand'chambre de la Cour de cassation, soixante-dix ans jour pour jour après le prononcé du verdict du tribunal de Nuremberg, est de passer d'une perspective historique aux leçons à tirer pour la justice pénale internationale. La notion de crime contre l'humanité conserve toute sa spécificité et son actualité. À partir de l'acte fondateur que constitue le jugement de Nuremberg, sont explorés les fondements et les éléments constitutifs de ce crime ainsi que sa place au regard des principes de souveraineté et de légalité pénales. La confrontation du droit français au droit international permet de réfléchir au niveau de compétence adéquat pour le jugement des crimes contre l'humanité, dont les frontières avec certains actes de terrorisme tendent à s'effacer. L'expérience des différentes juridictions pénales internationales conduit à rechercher le modèle procédural le plus pertinent, en posant les jalons d'une figure universelle du procès. La réflexion sur le mode de désignation des juges, au regard des qualités attendues et des obligations déontologiques forgeant une identité commune au-delà des frontières nationales, fait émerger un pouvoir juridictionnel international. Quels crimes ? Quels juges ? Pour quel procès ?
Crimes against humanity --- International criminal courts --- Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946 --- Crimes contre l'humanité --- Tribunaux criminels internationaux --- Nuremberg, Procès de, 1945-1946 --- Nuremberg, Procès de (1945-1946) --- Procès --- Crimes contre l'humanité --- Nuremberg, Procès de, 1945-1946 --- Tribunaux criminels internationaux. --- Procès. --- Nuremberg, Procès de (1945-1946) --- Procès.
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 9 of 9 |
Sort by
|