Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

New technologies can both substitute for and complement labor. Evidence from structural vector autoregressions using a large global sample of economies suggests that the substitution effect dominates in the short-run for over three-quarters of economies. A typical 10 percent technology-driven improvement in labor productivity reduces employment by 2 percent in advanced economies in the first year and 1 percent in emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs). Advanced economies have been more affected by employment-displacing technological change in recent decades but the disruption to the labor market in EMDEs has been more persistent. The negative employment effect is larger and more persistent in economies that have experienced a larger increase, or smaller fall, in industrial employment shares since 1990. In contrast, economies where workers have been better able to transition to other sectors have benefited more in the medium run from the positive "income effect" of new technologies. This corresponds with existing evidence that industrial jobs are most at risk of automation and reduced-form evidence that more industrially-focused economies have tended to create fewer jobs in recent decades. EMDEs are likely to face increasing challenges from automation as their share of global industry and production complexity increases.

Automation --- Emerging Market Economies --- Employment --- Industrial Economics --- Industrial Employment --- Industry --- Labor Markets --- Private Sector Development --- Private Sector Economics --- Productivity --- Science and Technology Development --- SVAR --- Technology Adoption --- Technology Innovation --- Technology Shock

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Frequently, factors other than structural developments in technology and production efficiency drive changes in labor productivity in advanced and emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs). This paper uses a new method to extract technology shocks that excludes these influences, resulting in lasting improvements in labor productivity. The same methodology in turn is used to identify a stylized example of the effects of a demand shock on productivity. Technology innovations are accompanied by higher and more rapidly increasing rates of investment in EMDEs relative to advanced economies, suggesting that positive technological developments are often capital-embodied in the former economies. Employment falls in both advanced economies and EMDEs following positive technology developments, with the effect smaller but more persistent in EMDEs. Uncorrelated technological developments across economies suggest that global synchronization of labor productivity growth is due to cyclical (demand) influences. Demand drivers of labor productivity are found to have highly persistent effects in EMDEs and some advanced economies. Unlike technology shocks, however, demand shocks influence labor productivity only through the capital deepening channel, particularly in economies with low capacity for counter-cyclical fiscal policy. Overall, non-technological factors accounted for most of the fall in labor productivity growth during 2007-08 and around one-third of the longer-term productivity decline after the global financial crisis.

Advanced Economies --- Business Cycle --- Demand Driver --- Developing Economies --- Economic Growth --- Emerging Market Economies --- Emerging Markets --- Labor Markets --- Labor Productivity --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Private Sector Development --- Private Sector Economics --- Productivity Dynamics --- Science and Technology Development --- Technology --- Technology Diffusion --- Technology Innovation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The outbreak of COVID-19 and the wide-ranging measures needed to slow its advance triggered an unprecedented collapse in oil demand, a surge in oil inventories, and a record one-month decline in oil prices in March 2020. This paper examines the likely implications of the 2020 oil price plunge for emerging market and developing economies. It presents four main results. First, the record plunge in oil prices was predominantly driven by demand factors as wide-ranging measures to stem the pandemic precipitated an unprecedented collapse in oil demand, but the surge in oil inventories also exerted downward pressure on oil prices. Second, this latest oil price decline was preceded by six previous plunges over the past half-century, during which energy exporters and importers suffered similar initial output losses (about 0.5 percent) that were unwound within three years. Third, the current episode of low oil prices holds limited promise to boost the global economy amid widespread restrictions and narrow room for fiscal support in energy-exporting emerging market and developing economies. Fourth, many emerging market and developing economies entered the current public health crisis with precarious fiscal positions; current low oil prices are thus an opportunity to review energy-pricing policies, including remaining energy subsidies, to mobilize domestic resources.

Business Cycles and Stabilization Policies --- Commodities --- Commodity Prices --- Coronavirus --- COVID-19 --- Demand --- Economic Conditions and Volatility --- Energy --- Energy Demand --- Energy Policies and Economics --- Energy Production and Transportation --- Macroeconomic Management --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Oil and Gas --- Oil Prices --- Oil Production --- Pandemic Impact --- Price Elasticity of Demand --- Supply