Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This book explores the modern physicist Niels Bohr’s philosophical thought, specifically his pivotal idea of complementarity, with a focus on the relation between the roles of what he metaphorically calls “spectators” and “actors.” It seeks to spell out the structural and historical complexity of the idea of complementarity in terms of different modes of the ‘spectator-actor’ relation, showing, in particular, that the reorganization of Bohr’s thought starting from his 1935 debate with Einstein and his collaborators is characterized by an extension of the dynamic conception of complementarity from non-physical contexts to the very field of quantum theory. Further, linked with this analysis, the book situates Bohr’s complementarity in contemporary philosophical context by examining its intersections with post-Heideggerian hermeneutics as well as Derridean deconstruction. Specifically, it points to both the close affinities and the differences between Bohr’s idea of the ‘actor-spectator’ relation and the hermeneutic notion of the relation between “belonging” and “distanciation.”.
Pure sciences. Natural sciences (general) --- Theory of knowledge --- filosofie --- epistomologie --- Philosophy of science --- wetenschapsgeschiedenis --- epistemologists --- Philosophy --- Bohr, Niels --- Complementarity (Physics) --- Complementarity (Physics). --- Deconstruction. --- Hermeneutics. --- Komplementaritätsprinzip. --- Science --- Wissenschaftsphilosophie. --- Philosophy. --- Bohr, Niels Henrik David, --- Philosophy, modern. --- History. --- Philosophy of Science. --- Modern Philosophy. --- History of Science. --- Annals --- Auxiliary sciences of history --- Modern philosophy --- Normal science --- Philosophy and science. --- Modern philosophy. --- Science and philosophy --- Bohr, Niels, --- Bohr, Niels. --- Boer, Niersi, --- Boerh, Niersi, --- Bohr, N. --- Bor, Nil's,
Choose an application
Philosophy --- Theory of knowledge --- Philosophy of science --- Pure sciences. Natural sciences (general) --- wetenschapsgeschiedenis --- filosofie --- epistomologie --- Bohr, Niels
Choose an application
This book explores the modern physicist Niels Bohr's philosophical thought, specifically his pivotal idea of complementarity, with a focus on the relation between the roles of what he metaphorically calls spectators and actors. It seeks to spell out the structural and historical complexity of the idea of complementarity in terms of different modes of the spectator-actor' relation, showing, in particular, that the reorganization of Bohr's thought starting from his 1935 debate with Einstein and his collaborators is characterized by an extension of the dynamic conception of complementarity from non-physical contexts to the very field of quantum theory. Further, linked with this analysis, the book situates Bohr's complementarity in contemporary philosophical context by examining its intersections with post-Heideggerian hermeneutics as well as Derridean deconstruction. Specifically, it points to both the close affinities and the differences between Bohr's idea of the actor-spectator' relation and the hermeneutic notion of the relation between belonging and distanciation.
Philosophy --- Theory of knowledge --- Philosophy of science --- Pure sciences. Natural sciences (general) --- wetenschapsgeschiedenis --- filosofie --- epistomologie --- Bohr, Niels --- Complementarity (Physics) --- Deconstruction --- Hermeneutics --- Science --- Normal science --- Interpretation, Methodology of --- Criticism --- Semiotics and literature --- Quantum theory --- Bohr, Niels, --- Boer, Niersi, --- Boerh, Niersi, --- Bohr, N. --- Bohr, Niels Henrik David, --- Bor, Nil's,
Choose an application
Hiromatsu argues that the change from Hegel’s theory of self-alienation to the concept of reification is crucial in establishing a new relational worldview which is still relevant today. Amongst other topics, his discussion of the understanding of society sees such as a relational dynamic wherein the individual is constantly composed and composing in relation to others, including nature. This understanding is, he argues, the “single science of history” of Marx and Engels. It overcomes the hypostasizing subject - object relation still prevalent today. Originally published in Japanese as Busshokaron No Kozu by Iwanami Shoten, Publishers, Tokyo, 1983, 1994. © By Kuniko Hiromatsu.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|