Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Der nacheheliche Unterhaltsanspruch ist Spiegel der Rollenverteilung während der Ehe. Vor dem Hintergrund veränderter gesellschaftlicher Verhältnisse entwickelt die Verfasserin Vorschläge für eine zeitgemäße Grenzziehung zwischen nachehelicher Eigen- und Mitverantwortung. Grundlage ist ein detaillierter Rechtsvergleich der französischen Ausgleichsleistung prestation compensatoire und des deutschen Geschiedenenunterhalts unter Berücksichtigung relevanter Bezüge zum Scheidungs- und Verfahrensrecht sowie gesellschaftlicher und familienpolitischer Rahmenbedingungen. Trotz der unterschiedlichen Ausgestaltung nachehelichen Unterhalts in den beiden Rechtsordnungen enthüllt die Verfasserin grundlegende gemeinsame Wertentscheidungen und zeigt internationale Perspektiven auf.
347.62 <44> --- 347.62 <43> --- 347.62 <43> Huwelijksrecht. Huwelijksvoorwaarden. Huwelijksformaliteiten. Nietigheid, aanvechtbaarheid van het huwelijk. Rechten en plichten van echtgenoten--Duitsland --- Huwelijksrecht. Huwelijksvoorwaarden. Huwelijksformaliteiten. Nietigheid, aanvechtbaarheid van het huwelijk. Rechten en plichten van echtgenoten--Duitsland --- 347.62 <44> Huwelijksrecht. Huwelijksvoorwaarden. Huwelijksformaliteiten. Nietigheid, aanvechtbaarheid van het huwelijk. Rechten en plichten van echtgenoten--Frankrijk --- Huwelijksrecht. Huwelijksvoorwaarden. Huwelijksformaliteiten. Nietigheid, aanvechtbaarheid van het huwelijk. Rechten en plichten van echtgenoten--Frankrijk --- Prestation compensatoire --- Famille --- Divorce --- Droit --- Pensions alimentaires --- Support (Domestic relations) --- E-books --- Pensions alimentaires. --- Support (Domestic relations) - Germany --- Support (Domestic relations) - France --- France --- Allemagne
Choose an application
his edited volume examines the diversity and pluralisation of family concepts that are subject to change as a result of the no longer self-evident interrelationships between sexuality, gender and reproduction. The focus is on the manifold challenges for jurisprudence and legislation brought about by today?s pluralisation of family forms and on divisive tensions that accompany the social and normative transformations. Same-sex partnerships, LGBTQI+ families and self-determination regarding one?s gender are increasingly recognised and treated equally. Assisted reproductive technology leads to a possible severance of biological, genetic and social family links. Against this background, how should legal concepts of partnership, family and parenthood be constructed in the future? How do the highest courts and human rights help shape new legal approaches? What are the common trends of co-existing legal systems? Where does the international community of states risk breaking apart? To answer these questions, this book brings together international expertise, namely from Australia, Austria, Germany, Poland, Portugal, South Africa and the USA.
Sex and law --- Sexualité --- Human reproduction --- Reproduction humaine --- Domestic relations --- Famille --- Sexual minorities --- Orientation sexuelle --- Droit --- Law and legislation. --- Droit. --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- European Court of Human Rights. --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. --- Domestic relations. --- Gender identity --- Women's studies. --- Sexualité --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. --- Familles --- Identité de genre --- Études sur les femmes. --- women's studies. --- Women's studies --- Law and legislation --- Gay parents --- Parents homosexuels --- In mass media. --- Dans les médias --- Afrique du Sud --- Pologne --- Portugal --- Australie --- Autriche --- Allemagne --- Etats-Unis
Choose an application
Choose an application
This open access contributed volume examines the ethical and legal foundations of (future) policies on recommender systems and offers a transdisciplinary approach to tackle important issues related to their development, use and integration into online eco-systems. This volume scrutinizes the values driving automated recommendations - what is important for an individual receiving the recommendation, the company on which that platform was received, and society at large might diverge. The volume addresses concerns about manipulation of individuals and risks for personal autonomy. From a legal perspective, the volume offers a much-needed evaluation of regulatory needs and lawmakers’ answers in various legal disciplines. The focus is on European Union measures of platform regulation, consumer protection and anti-discrimination law. The volume will be of particular interest to the community of legal scholars dealing with platform regulation and algorithmic decision making. By including specific use cases, the volume also exposes pitfalls associated with current models of regulation. Beyond the juxtaposition of purely ethical and legal perspectives, the volume contains truly interdisciplinary work on various aspects of recommender systems. .
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
The open access edited volume addresses children’s rights and their ability to act in the digital world. The focus is on the position of children as subjects with their own rights and developing capacities. Their consideration by parents, courts and legislators is critically examined. Aspects of digital parenting, especially educational practices and strategies in the context of social media, are analyzed with regard to the tension between protection and participation of children. The edited volume brings debates on privacy and data protection together with those from tort, family and intellectual property law, while also examining the role of families and children in the regulation of data and digital economies, especially online platforms. Legal reflections from Germany, Israel, Portugal and the United States of America are complemented by perspectives from media studies, political science, educational science and sociology of law. The Editors: Nina Dethloff, Professor of Civil Law, Private International Law, Comparative Law and European Private Law, University of Bonn, Germany Katharina Kaesling, Tenure Track Junior Professor of Civil Law, Intellectual Property, in particular Patent Law, and Legal Issues of AI, University of Dresden (TU), Germany Louisa Specht-Riemenschneider, Professor of Civil Law, Information and Data Law, University of Bonn, Germany.
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|