Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This volume examines the national plans that ten Euratom countries plus Switzerland and the United States are developing to address high-level radioactive waste storage and disposal. The chapters, which were written by 23 international experts, outline European and national regulations, technology choices, safety criteria, monitoring systems, compensation schemes, institutional structures, and approaches to public involvement. Key stakeholders, their values and interests are introduced, the responsibilities and authority of different actors considered, decision-making processes are analyzed as well as the factors influencing different national policy choices. The views and expectations of different communities regarding participatory decision making and compensation and the steps that have been or are being taken to promote dialogue and constructive problem-solving are also considered. Contents The International Dimension Countries with Geological Disposal after Reprocessing Nuclear Fuel Countries with Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel Countries with Long-Term Surface Storage for High Level Radioactive Waste Target Groups Energy (policy) experts; nuclear energy experts and practitioners, political and social scientists, economists, engineers; decision makers and consultants, civil society organizations The Editors Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Ana María Isidoro Losada, Lutz Mez and Miranda Schreurs; Environmental Policy Research Centre, Freie Universität Berlin and members of the project “Multi-level Governance Perspective on Nuclear Waste Disposal” within the research platform ENTRIA.
Energy. --- Energy Policy, Economics and Management. --- Comparative Politics. --- Nuclear Energy. --- Business & Economics --- Industries --- Radioactive waste disposal. --- Radioactive waste sites. --- Radioactive wastes --- Nuclear industry --- Radioactive waste sites --- Nuclear facilities --- Storage. --- Waste disposal. --- Location. --- Atomic facilities --- Facilities, Nuclear --- Nuclear installations --- Dumping sites, Radioactive --- Radioactive dumping sites --- Radioactive waste disposal sites --- Radioactive waste facilities --- Atomic energy industries --- Atomic industry --- Atomic power industry --- Nuclear energy industry --- Nuclear power industry --- Nuclear waste disposal --- Energy policy. --- Energy and state. --- Nuclear energy. --- Comparative politics. --- Nuclear energy --- Nuclear engineering --- Hazardous waste sites --- Energy industries --- Radioactivity --- Refuse and refuse disposal --- Radioactive pollution --- Safety measures --- Comparative political systems --- Comparative politics --- Government, Comparative --- Political systems, Comparative --- Political science --- Atomic energy --- Atomic power --- Energy, Atomic --- Energy, Nuclear --- Nuclear power --- Power, Atomic --- Power, Nuclear --- Force and energy --- Nuclear physics --- Power resources --- Nuclear power plants --- Energy and state --- State and energy --- Industrial policy --- Energy conservation --- Government policy
Choose an application
This is volume two of a comparative analysis of nuclear waste governance and public participation in decision-making regarding the storage and siting of high-level radioactive waste and spent fuel in different countries. The contributors examine both the historical and current approaches countries have taken to address the wicked challenge of nuclear waste governance. The analyses discuss the regulations, technology choices, safety criteria, costs and financing issues, compensation schemes, institutional structures, and approaches to public participation found in each country. Contents Technical, Political, and Socio-Economic Challenges of Nuclear Waste Governance “The Big 4” – China, Russia, South Korea and Japan The Eastern European Countries Nuclear Waste Governance in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, and South Africa Target Groups Energy (policy) experts, nuclear energy experts and practitioners, political and social scientists, economists, engineers, decision makers and consultants, civil society organizations The Editors Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Ana María Isidoro Losada, Lutz Mez, Environmental Policy Research Centre, Freie Universität Berlin, and Miranda A. Schreurs, Bavarian School of Public Policy, Technical University of Munich, were members of the project “Multi Level Governance-Perspective on Nuclear Waste Disposal” within the research platform ENTRIA (2013-2017).
Political science. --- Energy policy. --- Energy and state. --- Comparative politics. --- Environmental policy. --- Political Science and International Relations. --- Comparative Politics. --- Energy Policy, Economics and Management. --- Environmental Politics. --- Environment and state --- Environmental control --- Environmental management --- Environmental protection --- Environmental quality --- State and environment --- Environmental auditing --- Comparative political systems --- Comparative politics --- Government, Comparative --- Political systems, Comparative --- Political science --- Energy and state --- Power resources --- State and energy --- Industrial policy --- Energy conservation --- Administration --- Civil government --- Commonwealth, The --- Government --- Political theory --- Political thought --- Politics --- Science, Political --- Social sciences --- State, The --- Government policy --- Radioactive wastes. --- Nuclear wastes --- Radwastes --- Wastes, Nuclear --- Wastes, Radioactive --- Hazardous wastes --- Nuclear engineering --- Radioactive substances --- Comparative government. --- Environmental Policy.
Choose an application
This is volume two of a comparative analysis of nuclear waste governance and public participation in decision-making regarding the storage and siting of high-level radioactive waste and spent fuel in different countries. The contributors examine both the historical and current approaches countries have taken to address the wicked challenge of nuclear waste governance. The analyses discuss the regulations, technology choices, safety criteria, costs and financing issues, compensation schemes, institutional structures, and approaches to public participation found in each country. Contents Technical, Political, and Socio-Economic Challenges of Nuclear Waste Governance “The Big 4” – China, Russia, South Korea and Japan The Eastern European Countries Nuclear Waste Governance in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, and South Africa Target Groups Energy (policy) experts, nuclear energy experts and practitioners, political and social scientists, economists, engineers, decision makers and consultants, civil society organizations The Editors Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Ana María Isidoro Losada, Lutz Mez, Environmental Policy Research Centre, Freie Universität Berlin, and Miranda A. Schreurs, Bavarian School of Public Policy, Technical University of Munich, were members of the project “Multi Level Governance-Perspective on Nuclear Waste Disposal” within the research platform ENTRIA (2013-2017).
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Sociology of policy --- Political systems --- Relation between energy and economics --- Environmental protection. Environmental technology --- energiebeheer (technologie) --- energiemanagement (economie) --- energiebeleid --- energie-economie --- politiek --- milieubeleid --- kernenergie --- milieupolitiek
Choose an application
This volume examines the national plans that ten Euratom countries plus Switzerland and the United States are developing to address high-level radioactive waste storage and disposal. The chapters, which were written by 23 international experts, outline European and national regulations, technology choices, safety criteria, monitoring systems, compensation schemes, institutional structures, and approaches to public involvement. Key stakeholders, their values and interests are introduced, the responsibilities and authority of different actors considered, decision-making processes are analyzed as well as the factors influencing different national policy choices. The views and expectations of different communities regarding participatory decision making and compensation and the steps that have been or are being taken to promote dialogue and constructive problem-solving are also considered. Contents The International Dimension Countries with Geological Disposal after Reprocessing Nuclear Fuel Countries with Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel Countries with Long-Term Surface Storage for High Level Radioactive Waste Target Groups Energy (policy) experts; nuclear energy experts and practitioners, political and social scientists, economists, engineers; decision makers and consultants, civil society organizations The Editors Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Ana María Isidoro Losada, Lutz Mez and Miranda Schreurs; Environmental Policy Research Centre, Freie Universität Berlin and members of the project “Multi-level Governance Perspective on Nuclear Waste Disposal” within the research platform ENTRIA.
Political systems --- Relation between energy and economics --- Nuclear energy --- energiebeheer (technologie) --- energiemanagement (economie) --- energiebeleid --- energie-economie --- politiek --- kernenergie
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|