Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
A new U.S. grand strategy has been emerging, one that requires not only resources but patience and commitment: the promotion of democracy and freedom abroad. The U.S. armed forces will continue to be among the myriad contributors necessary to achieve this goal. In the face of increasing complexity, changing tactics, and tight budgets, the defense establishment will need to change in multiple ways, yet must also not risk its historic strengths. This volume draws together and integrates insights derived from a wide range of research efforts undertaken at RAND over the past few years. Some of the
Militarism -- United States. --- United States -- Armed Forces -- Reorganization. --- United States -- Military policy. --- World politics -- 21st century. --- World politics --- Armies --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- United States --- Military policy. --- Armed Forces --- Reorganization.
Choose an application
Before Donald H. Rumsfeld entered his second tenure as Secretary of Defense in 2001, the selection of senior U.S. military officers for top-ranking positions within the Department of Defense (DoD) was largely decided within the uniformed services, and the Secretary of Defense did not typically challenge the recommendations. However, to support his goal of transforming the defense establishment, Rumsfeld decided to become personally involved in the selection process. Rumsfeld's changes resulted in a process that featured long-term succession planning, identified qualifications for senior positions, built a slate of highly qualified officers, and sought to arrive at a series of "best fit" decisions for the top military positions. The process also focused on planning for the future by identifying highly capable leaders and associating them with a series of assignments that would prepare them for the top military positions. When Rumsfeld left DoD in 2006, parts of the process he developed were retained, and others were changed significantly or discarded. The process has continued to evolve, at times rekindling some of the efforts Rumsfeld initiated but reshaping them to suit the leadership style of current DoD officials. The authors review senior leader selection and succession planning in general, describe the process developed by Rumsfeld, and investigate how the process evolved after Rumsfeld left office. In conclusion, they identify key system attributes that future DoD officials should consider as they contemplate how senior officer selection and assignments will be managed.
Leadership --- Rumsfeld, Donald, --- United States. --- Officials and employees --- Selection and appointment. --- Officers --- Management.
Choose an application
NATO's success in Afghanistan--or lack thereof--will have significant implications for the alliance itself. The authors examine the current mission in light of NATO's history and with an eye toward the future. NATO faces a long and daunting list of issues that extends beyond the borders of the member countries. The alliance must confront them, however, because failure to do so would risk its long-term success and sustainability.
#SBIB:327.7H32 --- #SBIB:328H59Bondgenootschappen: NAVO / NATO --- Instellingen en beleid: andere Aziatische landen --- #SBIB:328H59 --- Bondgenootschappen: NAVO / NATO --- Afghan War, 2001-. --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --Afghanistan --Operations other than war. --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --Afghanistan. --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --Armed Forces --Afghanistan. --- -Military & Naval Science --- -North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- Operations other than war. --- Afghan War, 2001 --- -#SBIB:327.7H32 --- Operation Enduring Freedom, 2001 --- -War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- NAVO --- OTAN --- Armed Forces --- -Operation Enduring Freedom, 2001 --- NATO --- -Afghan War, 2001 --- Afghan War, 2001-2021. --- Afghan War, 2001-2921. --- Counterinsurgency --- Counterguerrilla warfare --- Guerrilla warfare --- Insurgency --- -NATO
Choose an application
The U.S. defense strategy and posture have become insolvent. The tasks that the nation expects its military forces and other elements of national power to do internationally exceed the means that are available to accomplish those tasks. Sustained, coordinated efforts by the United States and its allies are necessary to deter and defeat modern threats, including Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine and reconstituted forces and China's economic takeoff and concomitant military modernization. This report offers ideas on how to address shortcomings in defense preparations.
Choose an application
Strategic culture --- National security --- Homeland defense --- Homeland security --- Culture --- Military policy --- United States --- Foreign relations
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|