Listing 1 - 10 of 47 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This book brings together new household and enterprise data from 41 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa to inform policy makers and practitioners on ways to expand women entrepreneurs economic opportunities. Sub-Saharan Africa boasts the highest share of women entrepreneurs, but they are disproportionately concentrated among the self-employed rather than employers. Relative to men, women are pursuing lower opportunity activities, with their enterprises more likely to be smaller, informal, and in low value-added lines of business. The challenge in expanding opportunities is not helping more women become entrepreneurs but enabling them to shift to higher return activities. A central question addressed in the book is what explains the gender sorting in the types of enterprises that women and men run? The analysis shows that many Sub-Saharan countries present a challenging environment for women. Four key areas of the agenda for expanding womens economic opportunities in Africa are analyzed: strengthening womens property rights and their ability to control assets; improving womens access to finance; building human capital in business skills and networks; and strengthening womens voices in business environment reform. These areas are important both because they have wide gender gaps and because they help explain gender differences in entrepreneurial activities. It is particularly striking that while gender gaps in education tend to close with higher incomes, gaps in womens property rights and in womens participation in reform processes do not. As simply raising a countrys income is unlikely to be sufficient to give women equal ability to control assets or have greater voice, more proactive steps will be needed. Practical guidelines to move the agenda forward are discussed for each of these key areas.
Women --- Businesswomen --- Economic conditions. --- Social conditions. --- Employment --- Human females --- Wimmin --- Woman --- Womon --- Womyn --- Entrepreneurs, Women --- Women entrepreneurs --- Women in business --- Females --- Human beings --- Femininity --- Businesspeople --- Women-owned business enterprises
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Size, age, sector, and productivity are commonly cited as factors determining a firm's survival. However, there are several dimensions of the investment climate in which the firm operates that affect whether it continues in business or exits. This paper uses new panel data from 27 Eastern European and Central Asian countries to test the importance of five areas of the business climate on firm exit: the efficiency of government services, access to finance, the extent of corruption or cronyism, the strength of property rights, and the degree of competition. The paper finds that weaknesses in these areas do affect the probability of firm exit - largely in ways that undermine the Schumpeterian cleansing role of exit in raising overall productivity. Greater costs and regulatory burdens raise the probability that more productive firms exit, while less developed financial and legal institutions mitigate forces that would otherwise push less productive firms to exit. Thus, the more productive firms stand to gain the most from improvements in the investment climate, whether that is lowering transaction costs or improving market mechanisms. This holds both within countries and across countries. The impact of a particular investment climate measure can also differ significantly by type of firm, with the focus given to firm size. The differential impact on size can be significant at a size cutoff of 10 or more employees. As these are the firms that are near the threshold of many regulatory requirements, the implications are not just with regard to whether a firm remains in operation, but whether it does so in the formal sector.
Access to credit --- Access to Finance --- Access to finance --- Access to loans --- Bribes --- Corruption --- Debt Markets --- Emerging Markets --- Employee --- Environmental Economics and Policies --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial institutions --- Financial markets --- Financial services --- Financial system --- Fixed costs --- International Bank --- Investment decisions --- Labor market --- Microfinance --- Multinational --- Multinationals --- Private Sector Development --- Property Rights --- Red tape --- Transaction costs --- Transactions costs
Choose an application
January 2001 This rich new database on 4,000 Asian firms--operating in Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand--focuses on the impact of Asia's economic crisis and on the longer-run determinants of productivity, employment practices, and financial structure. Researchers have decried the limited supply of objective, comparable firm-level data from developing countries. Hallward-Driemeier describes a new database that helps fill this information gap. The database has detailed records on 4,000 firms operating in Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand. A comparable survey instrument and sampling methodology was used in each country, and all five studies were carried out simultaneously. The data cover three years (1996-98), allowing for measurements of firm performance before and immediately after the East Asian financial crisis. The questionnaire focused on measuring the impact of the regional financial crisis at the microeconomic level and understanding the longer-run determinants of productivity, employment practices, and financial structure. This database--the first step in the important Firm Analysis and Competitiveness Surveys initiative that the World Bank is spearheading--will be joined by additional country databases. The aim is to fill the gap in much-needed microeconomic evidence using comparable instruments. This paper--a product of Macroeconomics and Growth, Development Research Group--is part of a larger effort in the group to collect comparable firm-level information from developing countries. The research was funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project "Impact of the East Asian Crisis" (RPO 632-28). The author may be contacted at mhallward@worldbank.org.
Financial crises --- Industrial productivity --- Industries --- Databases.
Choose an application
Size, age, sector, and productivity are commonly cited as factors determining a firm's survival. However, there are several dimensions of the investment climate in which the firm operates that affect whether it continues in business or exits. This paper uses new panel data from 27 Eastern European and Central Asian countries to test the importance of five areas of the business climate on firm exit: the efficiency of government services, access to finance, the extent of corruption or cronyism, the strength of property rights, and the degree of competition. The paper finds that weaknesses in these areas do affect the probability of firm exit - largely in ways that undermine the Schumpeterian cleansing role of exit in raising overall productivity. Greater costs and regulatory burdens raise the probability that more productive firms exit, while less developed financial and legal institutions mitigate forces that would otherwise push less productive firms to exit. Thus, the more productive firms stand to gain the most from improvements in the investment climate, whether that is lowering transaction costs or improving market mechanisms. This holds both within countries and across countries. The impact of a particular investment climate measure can also differ significantly by type of firm, with the focus given to firm size. The differential impact on size can be significant at a size cutoff of 10 or more employees. As these are the firms that are near the threshold of many regulatory requirements, the implications are not just with regard to whether a firm remains in operation, but whether it does so in the formal sector.
Access to credit --- Access to Finance --- Access to finance --- Access to loans --- Bribes --- Corruption --- Debt Markets --- Emerging Markets --- Employee --- Environmental Economics and Policies --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial institutions --- Financial markets --- Financial services --- Financial system --- Fixed costs --- International Bank --- Investment decisions --- Labor market --- Microfinance --- Multinational --- Multinationals --- Private Sector Development --- Property Rights --- Red tape --- Transaction costs --- Transactions costs
Choose an application
Does democratization promote economic competition? This paper documents that the disruption of political connections associated with Suharto's fall had a modest pro-competitive effect on Indonesian manufacturing industries in which his family had extensive business interests. Firms with connections to Suharto lost substantial market share following his resignation. Industries in which Suharto family firms had larger market share during his tenure exhibited weak improvements in broader measures of competition in the post-Suharto era relative to industries in which Suharto firms had not been important players.
Competition Policy --- Corporate Governance and Corruption --- Corruption --- Cronyism --- Democracy --- Democratic Government --- Firm Dynamics --- Governance --- Manufacturing --- Political Connections --- Political Turnover --- Private Sector Development --- Public Sector Development --- State-Business Relationships
Choose an application
The importance of property rights in providing the incentive to invest, work hard, and innovate has been recognized for centuries. Yet, many women in Africa do not have the same property rights or formal legal capacity enjoyed by men. Empowering Women: Legal Rights and Economic Opportunities in Africa documents the extent to which the legal capacity and property rights vary for women and men, and analyzes the impact this has on women's economic opportunities. The book introduces the "Women's Legal Economic Empowerment Database - Africa (Women LEED Africa)." This database covers all 47 countrie
Women --- Women's rights --- Sex discrimination against women --- Economic conditions. --- Social conditions. --- Discrimination against women --- Subordination of women --- Women, Discrimination against --- Feminism --- Sex discrimination --- Male domination (Social structure)
Choose an application
The use of expert or qualitative surveys to rank countries' business investment conditions is widespread. However, within the economic literature there are concerns about measurement error and endogeneity based on characteristics of the respondents, raising questions about how well the data reflect the underlying reality they are trying to measure. This paper examines these concerns using data from 79,000 firms in 105 countries. The findings show that first, qualitative rankings correlate well with quantitative measures of the business environment, using both quantitative measures from within the survey and from external sources. Second, there are systematic variations in perceptions based on firm characteristics - focusing in particular on size and growth performance. However, it is not that an optimistic view of the business environment is simply the expression of a firm's own performance. Rather, firm size and performance affect the relative importance of certain constraints, particularly in areas such as finance, time with officials/inspectors, corruption, and access to reliable electricity. The results also show that much of the variation in subjective responses by firm types is largely due to differences in the objective conditions across firm types. There is little evidence that size and performance have non-linear effects in how constraining a given objective condition is reported to be. Overall, concerns about endogeneity remain in using business environment indicators to explain firm performance, but this stems primarily from the fact that who you are and how well you are doing can affect the conditions you face rather than whether the indicator used is qualitative or quantitative.
Access to Finance --- Access to finance --- Allocative efficiency --- Bribes --- Corruption --- E-Business --- Economic development --- Economic growth --- Empirical evidence --- Employment growth --- Environment --- Environmental Economics and Policies --- External finance --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- International bank --- Lack of access --- Limited access --- Limited access to finance --- Metals --- Microfinance --- Multipliers --- Policy makers --- Private Sector Development --- Property rights --- Public goods --- Tax rates --- Transport --- Transport Economics, Policy and Planning --- Wages
Listing 1 - 10 of 47 | << page >> |
Sort by
|