Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The Term Structure of Growth-at-Risk.
Choose an application
Using panel quantile regressions for 11 advanced and 10 emerging market economies, we show that the conditional distribution of GDP growth depends on financial conditions, with growth-at-risk (GaR)—defined as growth at the lower 5th percentile—more responsive than the median or upper percentiles. In addition, the term structure of GaR features an intertemporal tradeoff: GaR is higher in the short run; but lower in the medium run when initial financial conditions are loose relative to typical levels, and the tradeoff is amplified by a credit boom. This shift in the growth distribution generally is not incorporated when solving dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models with macrofinancial linkages, which suggests downside risks to GDP growth are systematically underestimated.
Banks and banking --- Agricultural banks --- Banking --- Banking industry --- Commercial banks --- Depository institutions --- Finance --- Financial institutions --- Money --- Finance. --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Money and Monetary Policy --- International Business Cycles --- Monetary Growth Models --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Monetary economics --- Growth-at-risk assessment --- Credit booms --- Credit --- Financial sector risk --- Macrofinancial linkages --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial risk management --- Financial services industry --- United States
Choose an application
Would the introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) lead to lower deposits (disintermediation) and lending in the banking sector? This paper develops a model where households heterogeneous in wealth allocate between an illiquid asset and assets that can be used for payments: bank deposits, cash, and CBDC. CBDC is more efficient as a means of payment and has lower access cost than deposits. Deposits are offered by an imperfectly competitive banking sector which raises deposit interest rates after CBDC introduction to prevent substitution away from deposits to CBDC. We find that there are two opposing margins of impact on the level of aggregate deposits: (1) the intensive margin gain in deposits by richer households increasing their holdings of deposits because of higher interest rates, and (2) the extensive margin loss of deposits among poorer households who switch from deposits to the CBDC. The extensive margin loss in deposits is more likely to dominate (yielding a fall in aggregate deposits) when the mass of poorer households is large and when it is relatively costly to access bank accounts. This tends to be the case in developing and emerging market economies. However, even when the extensive margin loss of deposits dominates and there is disintermediation, the impact on lending is quantitatively small if banks have access to other forms of funding, such as wholesale or central bank financing.
Bank credit --- Bank deposits --- Banking --- Banks and Banking --- Banks and banking --- Banks --- Central Bank digital currencies --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Credit --- Currency crises --- Deposit rates --- Depository Institutions --- Distributed ledgers --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Economics --- Economics: General --- Finance --- Finance: General --- Financial inclusion --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Financial markets --- Financial services industry --- Financial services --- Government and the Monetary System --- Industries: Financial Services --- Informal sector --- Interest rates --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Macroeconomics --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Monetary economics --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Monetary Systems --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Money --- Mortgages --- Payment Systems --- Regimes --- Standards --- Technological innovations --- Technology
Choose an application
Has monetary policy in advanced economies been less effective since the global financial crisis because of deteriorating household balance sheets? This paper examines the question using household data from the United States. It compares the responsiveness of household consumption to monetary policy shocks in the pre- and post-crisis periods, relating changes in monetary transmission to changes in household indebtedness and liquidity. The results show that the responsiveness of household consumption has diminished since the crisis. However, household balance sheets are not the culprit. Households with higher debt levels and lower shares of liquid assets are the most responsive to monetary policy, and the share of these households in the population grew. Other factors, such as economic uncertainty, appear to have played a bigger role in the decline of households’ responsiveness to monetary policy.
Monetary policy --- Econometric models. --- Exports and Imports --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Monetary Policy --- Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics: Household Analysis: General --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Portfolio Choice --- Investment Decisions --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- International economics --- Finance --- Consumption --- Household consumption --- Debt burden --- Liquidity --- Income --- National accounts --- External debt --- Asset and liability management --- Economics --- Debts, External --- United States
Choose an application
Cross-border payments can be slow, expensive, and risky. They are intermediated by counterparties in different jurisdictions which rely on costly trusted relationships to offset the lack of a common settlement asset as well as common rules and governance. In this paper, we present a vision for a multilateral platform that could improve cross-border payments, as well as related foreign exchange transactions, risk sharing, and more generally, financial contracting. The approach is to leverage technological innovations for public policy objectives. A common ledger, smart contracts, and encryption offer significant gains to market efficiency, completeness, and access, as well as to transparency, transaction and compliance costs, and safety. This paper is a first step aiming to stimulate further work in this space.
Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Industries: Financial Services --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Finance: General --- Foreign Exchange --- Accounting --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Demand for Money --- International Financial Markets --- International Finance: General --- Monetary Systems --- Standards --- Regimes --- Government and the Monetary System --- Payment Systems --- Public Administration --- Public Sector Accounting and Audits --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Computer applications in industry & technology --- Monetary economics --- Finance --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Financial reporting, financial statements --- Smart contracts --- Technology --- Currencies --- Money --- Currency markets --- Financial markets --- Financial statements --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Financial services industry --- Technological innovations --- Foreign exchange market --- Finance, Public --- United States
Choose an application
Cross-border payments can be slow, expensive, and risky. They are intermediated by counterparties in different jurisdictions which rely on costly trusted relationships to offset the lack of a common settlement asset as well as common rules and governance. In this paper, we present a vision for a multilateral platform that could improve cross-border payments, as well as related foreign exchange transactions, risk sharing, and more generally, financial contracting. The approach is to leverage technological innovations for public policy objectives. A common ledger, smart contracts, and encryption offer significant gains to market efficiency, completeness, and access, as well as to transparency, transaction and compliance costs, and safety. This paper is a first step aiming to stimulate further work in this space.
United States --- Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Industries: Financial Services --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Finance: General --- Foreign Exchange --- Accounting --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Demand for Money --- International Financial Markets --- International Finance: General --- Monetary Systems --- Standards --- Regimes --- Government and the Monetary System --- Payment Systems --- Public Administration --- Public Sector Accounting and Audits --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Computer applications in industry & technology --- Monetary economics --- Finance --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Financial reporting, financial statements --- Smart contracts --- Technology --- Currencies --- Money --- Currency markets --- Financial markets --- Financial statements --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Financial services industry --- Technological innovations --- Foreign exchange market --- Finance, Public
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|