Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Danielle Gluns examines how urban housing governance reacts to the onset of urban growth in an internationally comparative perspective. The study is based on in‐depth case studies of Washington, D.C., which is an example of primarily market‐based interactions, and Vienna, which has traditionally pursued an active steering role of the local state. The author assesses the goals of urban development formulated by local actors and analyzes their translation into housing policies within the respective governance structures. She demonstrates that path dependence is an important feature of urban housing governance, with relationships, ideologies, and physical urban structures leading to stability. Even so, change is possible, as both systems integrate new policy elements. At the same time, both structures perpetuate inequality in the urban housing system by excluding some of the most disadvantaged groups from decision‐making. Contents Stability and Change in Urban Housing Governance Understanding the Context of Urban Housing Governance Housing Governance for an “Inclusive City“ in Washington, D.C. Housing Governance for a “High Quality of Life“ in Vienna Path Dependence, Change, and Legitimacy in Growing Cities Target Groups Academics, lecturers, and students in the fields of political science, governance, social policy, social inequality, urban sociology The Author Danielle Gluns completed her doctoral degree at the Institute of Political Science at Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.
Housing policy --- Housing --- Housing and state --- State and housing --- City planning --- Social policy --- Government policy --- Political science. --- Governance and Government. --- Social Structure, Social Inequality. --- Administration --- Civil government --- Commonwealth, The --- Government --- Political theory --- Political thought --- Politics --- Science, Political --- Social sciences --- State, The --- Social structure. --- Social inequality. --- Egalitarianism --- Inequality --- Social equality --- Social inequality --- Political science --- Sociology --- Democracy --- Liberty --- Organization, Social --- Social organization --- Anthropology --- Social institutions --- Equality.
Choose an application
Danielle Gluns examines how urban housing governance reacts to the onset of urban growth in an internationally comparative perspective. The study is based on in‐depth case studies of Washington, D.C., which is an example of primarily market‐based interactions, and Vienna, which has traditionally pursued an active steering role of the local state. The author assesses the goals of urban development formulated by local actors and analyzes their translation into housing policies within the respective governance structures. She demonstrates that path dependence is an important feature of urban housing governance, with relationships, ideologies, and physical urban structures leading to stability. Even so, change is possible, as both systems integrate new policy elements. At the same time, both structures perpetuate inequality in the urban housing system by excluding some of the most disadvantaged groups from decision‐making. Contents Stability and Change in Urban Housing Governance Understanding the Context of Urban Housing Governance Housing Governance for an “Inclusive City“ in Washington, D.C. Housing Governance for a “High Quality of Life“ in Vienna Path Dependence, Change, and Legitimacy in Growing Cities Target Groups Academics, lecturers, and students in the fields of political science, governance, social policy, social inequality, urban sociology The Author Danielle Gluns completed her doctoral degree at the Institute of Political Science at Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.
Social stratification --- Politics --- Public administration --- overheid --- politiek --- sociale ongelijkheid
Choose an application
Social stratification --- Politics --- Public administration --- overheid --- politiek --- sociale ongelijkheid
Choose an application
Der Austausch zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis wird aktuell häufig thematisiert: Wie lässt sich Transfer konzeptualisieren und systematisieren? Wie kann ein solcher Transfer konkret aussehen? Was sind Beispiele für Transfer in der Fluchtforschung und was wird aus Beispielfällen sowohl für die Wissenschaft als auch für die Praxis ersichtlich? In diesem Buch wird Transfer zunächst im Sinne einer Wissensmobilisierung konzeptualisiert: als Kommunikation, Beratung oder kooperatives Handeln und Forschen. Daran anschließend greift der Band die Fluchtforschung als Themenbereich heraus und die Autorinnen und Autoren diskutieren Transfer etwa aus Sicht der verschiedenen Bildungsbereiche, der Sozialen Arbeit und der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Fallbeispiele und Erläuterungen bieten einen Einstieg in das Thema und machen Transfer auch außerhalb der eigenen Fachperspektive verständlich. Interviews mit Akteur*innen aus der praktischen Arbeit ergänzen die Beiträge. Der Sammelband richtet sich an alle, die sich aus unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln mit dem Themenkreisen Transfer und dem Ankommen und der Teilhabe von Geflüchteten beschäftigen - an Entscheidungstragende in den Kommunen und Ländern, Forschende und Forschungsfördernde, Geflüchtete, Ehrenamtliche und Akteur*innen aus der Wirtschaft und der Zivilgesellschaft. Der Titel kann kostenlos als E-Book heruntergeladen werden.
Flucht --- Migration --- Wissen --- Kommunikation --- Beratung --- Forschungshandeln --- Integration --- berufliche Bildung --- Zuwanderung --- Geflüchtete --- NGO --- NRO --- Transfer --- Förderung --- Hilfe --- Communities of Practice --- Dissemination --- Ausbildung --- PTBS --- Service Learning --- Migration und ethnische Minderheiten --- Politische Soziologie --- Migration und Interkulturelle Kommunikation --- Interkulturelle und International Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft --- SWOT --- Geflüchtete --- Förderung
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|