Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Nicephorus Blemmydes was born as the second son of a doctor in Constantinople at the very end of the 12th century. In December 1224 he was ordained lector by patriarch Germanus II, which marked the beginning of a successful career in the Church, culminating in the foundation of an own monastery near Ephesus. Teaching, both on theological and secular topics, played a major part in his life as well. Among his pupils were George Acropolites and the future emperor Theodore II Lascaris. As to instruct his fellow monks in his monastery, Blemmydes wrote, among other things, four brief treatises, entitled 'De fide', 'De virtute et ascesi', 'De anima' and 'De corpore', each of which might have originally been part of his 'Typikon', yet has been circulating also independently. Up to now, only the 'De anima' has been decently edited.
Classical Greek literature --- Virtue --- Christian ethics --- Christian literature, Byzantine. --- Vertus --- Morale chrétienne --- Littérature chrétienne byzantine --- Early works to 1800. --- History --- Ouvrages avant 1800 --- Histoire --- Christian saints --- Holy Spirit --- Christian poetry, Greek --- Bible --- Criticism, Textual --- Manuscripts --- 877.3 --- Byzantijnse literatuur --- 877.3 Byzantijnse literatuur --- Morale chrétienne --- Littérature chrétienne byzantine --- Christian saints - Biography
Choose an application
In order to gain a deeper understanding of the shifting idea of authority of a text, its transmission and reception in a variety of genres, settings and contexts, this collective volume envisages to enlarge and deepen this understanding in tangling literary forgery and emulation. Authority and authoritative literary productions provoke all kinds of interest and emulation. Hermeneutical techniques, detailed exegesis and historical critique are invoked to put authority, and yes also possible falsifications, to the test. Scholars from various disciplines working on texts, either authoritative or forged, stemming from different periods of time reflect on a methodological basis and a hermeneutical entrance. In addition, a threefold axis of questioning the phenomenon of forgery is presented, viz. the motif of falsification, the mechanism or technique applied and, third, the direct or indirect effect of this fraud.
Comparative literature --- Antiquity --- anno 500-1499 --- anno 1400-1499 --- anno 1500-1599 --- Transmission of texts --- Forgery in literature. --- Forgery of inscriptions --- Forgery of manuscripts --- Forgery in literature --- History and criticism. --- Littérature -- Faux --- Transmission des textes
Choose an application
The authority of Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) in reviving human anatomy is without any doubt a landmark in the history of science. Yet his breakthrough was inconceivable without his predecessor's works. Moreover, later on, his own legacy would not remain untouched or undisputed. The question of scientific authority is not new; however it has hardly been tackled in a multidisciplinary and diachronic way. This volume brings together contributions from international scholars working in the field of theology, art history, philosophy, history of science and historical linguistics. Its goal is to contextualize and analyse the complex interaction between dogma and authority on the one hand and empirical progress on the other, both in the development of anatomy and the views on the human body, mainly before Vesalius's time. Indeed, it is not the volume's aim to focus exclusively on the role of Vesalius nor to assess the concept of medical and anatomical authority in a comprehensive way. Avoiding to repeat insights from the history of science as such, it intends to put old views to the test, and to bring up new questions and answers from diverse perspectives concerning the work of Vesalius and his predecessors and successors, by presenting different case studies from Antiquity to the Early Modern Times.
History of human medicine --- Vesalius, Andreas --- Antiquity --- anno 500-1499 --- anno 1500-1799 --- Anatomie --- Geschiedenis --- Anatomy --- Anatomists --- History, Ancient --- History, Early Modern 1451-1600 --- Early Modern History (Medicine) --- Early Modern History of Medicine --- Early Modern Medicine --- History of Medicine, Early Modern --- History, Early Modern --- Medicine, Early Modern --- Early Modern History --- Early Modern Histories (Medicine) --- Histories, Early Modern (Medicine) --- History, Early Modern (Medicine) --- History, Early Modern 1451 1600 --- Modern Histories, Early (Medicine) --- Modern History, Early --- Modern History, Early (Medicine) --- Modern Medicine, Early --- Ancient History (Medicine) --- Ancient History of Medicine --- History of Medicine, Ancient --- Medicine, Ancient History --- Ancient History --- Ancient Histories (Medicine) --- Ancient History Medicine --- Ancient History Medicines --- Histories, Ancient (Medicine) --- History Medicine, Ancient --- History Medicines, Ancient --- History, Ancient (Medicine) --- Medicine Ancient History --- Medicines, Ancient History --- history --- Vesalius, Andreas, --- Vesal, Andreas --- Vesale, André --- Vezalij, Andrej
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|