Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Argumentatie --- Argumentatie.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Pondering on Problems of Argumentation is a collection of twenty essays brought together for anyone who is interested in theoretical issues in the study of argumentation. This collection of papers gives the reader an insightful and balanced view of the kind of theoretical issues argumentation theorists are currently concerned with. Because most of the perspectives on argumentation that are en vogue are represented, this volume provides a multidisciplinary and even interdisciplinary outlook on the current state of affairs in argumentation theory. Some of the contributions in Pondering on Problems of Argumentation deal with problems of argumentation that have been recognized as theoretical issues for a considerable time, like the problems of fallaciousness and identifying argumentation structures. Other contributions discuss issues that have become a focus of attention only recently or regained their prominence, such as the relationship between dialectic and rhetoric, and the strategic use of the argumentative technique of dissociation. In five separate sections papers are included dealing with argumentative strategies, problems of norms of reasonableness and fallaciousness, types of argument and argument schemes the structure of argumentation and rules for advocacy and discussion. .

Applied linguistics. --- Humanities. --- Language and languages. --- Linguistics. --- Logic. --- Persuasion (Rhetoric). --- Reasoning --- Sciences - General --- Logic --- Physical Sciences & Mathematics --- Philosophy --- Philosophy & Religion --- Reasoning. --- Discourse ethics. --- Argumentation ethics --- Argumentation --- Ratiocination --- Philosophy. --- Language and languages --- Language and education. --- Applied Linguistics. --- Philosophy of Language. --- Philosophy, general. --- Language Education. --- Educational linguistics --- Education --- Linguistics --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Dialectic (Logic) --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Psychology --- Science --- Thought and thinking --- Mental philosophy --- Humanities --- Linguistic science --- Science of language --- Methodology --- Ethics --- Reason --- Judgment (Logic) --- Philosophy (General). --- Foreign languages --- Languages --- Anthropology --- Communication --- Ethnology --- Information theory --- Meaning (Psychology) --- Philology --- Language and languages—Philosophy.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The essays that are collected in Controversy and Confrontation provide a closer insight into the relationship between controversy and confrontation that deepens our understanding of the functioning of argumentative discourse in managing differences of opinion. Their authors stem from two backgrounds. First, the controversy scholars Dascal, Marras, Euli, Regner, Ferreira, and Lessl discuss historical controversies in science, both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective; Saim concentrates on a historical controversy; Fritz provides a historical perspective on controversies by analyzing communication principles. Second the argumentation scholars Johnson, van Laar, van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels address theoretical or empirical aspects of argumentative confrontation; Aakhus and Vasilyeva examine argumentative discourse from the perspective of conversation analysis; Jackson analyzes argumentative confrontation in a recent debate between scientists and politicians. Last but not least, two contributors, Kutrovátz and Zemplén, make an attempt to bridge the study of historical controversy and the study of argumentation.

Persuasion (Rhetoric). --- Debates and debating. --- Pragmatics. --- Logic. --- Reasoning. --- Persuasion (Rhetoric) --- Argumentation --- Ratiocination --- Reason --- Thought and thinking --- Judgment (Logic) --- Logic --- Pragmalinguistics --- General semantics --- Language and languages --- Logic, Symbolic and mathematical --- Semantics (Philosophy) --- Rhetoric --- Forensics (Public speaking) --- Oratory --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Dialectic (Logic) --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Science --- Reasoning --- Speaking --- Elocution --- Public speaking --- Discussion --- Methodology

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Persuasion (Rhetoric) --- Discourse analysis. --- Discourse grammar --- Text grammar --- Semantics --- Semiotics --- Rhetoric --- Forensics (Public speaking) --- Oratory --- Discourse analysis

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This volume presents a selection of papers reflecting key theoretical issues in argumentation theory. Its six sections are devoted to specific themes, including the analysis and evaluation of argumentation, argument schemes, and the contextual embedding of argumentation. The section on general perspectives on argumentation discusses the trends of empiricalization, contextualization and formalization, offers descriptions of the analytical and evaluative tools of informal logic, and highlights selected principles that argumentation theorists do and do not agree upon. In turn, the section on linguistic approaches to argumentation focuses on the problem of distinguishing between explanation and argument, while also elaborating on the role of verbal indicators of argument schemes. All essays included in this volume point out notable recent developments in the study of argumentation.

Logic --- Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Law --- Mass communications --- Linguistics --- History --- geletterdheid --- communicatie --- filosofie --- geschiedenis --- communicatiewetenschappen --- recht --- linguïstiek --- logica