Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
My curiosity and concern about the working class in America stems from childhood memories of my father, a cabinetmaker, and of my oldest brother, an autoworker, who were passionately involved in the labor movement. Perhaps because they so wanted the working class to achieve greater social and economic justice and because they insisted it was not happening, I became curious to know the reasons why. Without even being aware of it, I began to explore a possible explanation—the internal diver sity of the working class. In my studies of autoworkers (the prototype proletarians) in the United States, Italy, Argentina, and India, I discovered that they seemed to be more divided economically, socially, and politically in the more eco nomically advanced countries—an idea that ran contrary to the evolution ary predictions of my Marxist friends. When I reported this in Blue-Collar Stratification (1976), I was surprised that some of them who were commit ted to an ideology of working-class solidarity attacked the hypothesis because it ran against their convictions.
Labor movement -- United States -- Political activity. --- Labor unions -- United States -- Political activity. --- Labor movement --- Labor unions --- Business & Economics --- Labor & Workers' Economics --- Political activity --- Political activity. --- Mouvement ouvrier --- Syndicats --- Activité politique --- Business. --- Management science. --- Political science. --- Sociology. --- Business and Management. --- Business and Management, general. --- Political Science. --- Sociology, general. --- United States --- Labor movement - United States - Political activity.
Choose an application
In studying the impact of industry on class organization, social scientists have assumed that the effects of technological advance increase with time and that, as technology molds, dehumanizes, and alienates workers, the pressure mounts to change the system through political action. William H. Form tests these assumptions in his study. The author considers whether workers have more to do with one another as societies industrialize, whether they become more involved in organizations, and whether these involvements become distinctively similar, creating an organizational basis for a solidary working-class movement. To examine these questions, he chooses four countries (India, Argentina, Italy, and the U.S.) that vary in the extent of their industrial development. He then compares samples of skilled, semiskilled, and unskilled workers in order to ascertain how specific technologies to which they have been exposed affect their behavior in systems such as the work group, union, party, neighborhood, and nation.Originally published in 1976.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
Social stratification --- Sociology of work --- Machinery in the workplace. --- Industrial sociology. --- Automobile industry workers. --- Auto workers --- Automobile construction workers --- Automobile industry and trade --- Automobile workers --- Employees --- Sociology --- Industrial organization --- Industries --- Machinery in industry --- Work environment --- Social aspects
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|