Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
In an original assessment of all three branches, Jasmine Farrier reveals a new way in which the American federal system is broken. Turning away from the partisan narratives of everyday politics, Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial diagnoses the deeper and bipartisan nature of imbalance of power that undermines public deliberation and accountability, especially on war powers. By focusing on the lawsuits brought by Congressional members that challenge presidential unilateralism, Farrier provides a new diagnostic lens on the permanent institutional problems that have undermined the separation of powers system in the last five decades, across a diverse array of partisan and policy landscapes. As each chapter demonstrates, member lawsuits are an outlet for frustrated members of both parties who cannot get their House and Senate colleagues to confront overweening presidential action through normal legislative processes. But these lawsuits often backfire - leaving Congress as an institution even more disadvantaged. Jasmine Farrier argues these suits are more symptoms of constitutional dysfunction than the cure. Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial shows federal judges will not and cannot restore the separation of powers system alone. Fifty years of congressional atrophy cannot be reversed in court.
Political questions and judicial power --- Executive-legislative relations --- Judicial power --- Legislative power --- Executive power --- Separation of powers --- Emergency powers --- Power, Executive --- Presidents --- Political science --- Implied powers (Constitutional law) --- Power, Legislative --- Constitutional law --- Judicial review --- Judiciary --- Justiciability --- Power, Judicial --- Courts --- Judicial independence --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Cases. --- Powers --- constitution, congress, president, court, war powers.
Choose an application
In the past thirty years, Congress has dramatically changed its response to unpopular deficit spending. While the landmark Congressional Budget Act of 1974 tried to increase congressional budgeting powers, new budget processes created in the 1980's and 1990's were all explicitly designed to weaken member, majority, and institutional budgeting prerogatives. These later reforms shared the premise that Congress cannot naturally forge balanced budgets without new automatic mechanisms and enhanced presidential oversight. So Democratic majorities in Congress gave new budgeting powers to Presidents Reagan
Budget --- Budget process --- Finance, Public --- Budget deficits --- United States. --- Reform. --- Powers and duties.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|