Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The creation of a secular education system was one of the great social experiments designed to break down religious intolerance within society. One element of this design was administrative, involving the creation of non-denominational schools, and another element involved a centralised curriculum. In this collection of essays, political philosophers, lawyers, sociologists, theologians and educators explore the role of state schools in promoting tolerance within 21st century multicultural, religiously pluralistic societies. How may different models of liberalism in the secular state have different out­comes in relation to religious tolerance in the education system? Does a state education system have a role in teaching values such as tolerance, and if so, how is this best achieved? How are epistemology and truth connected with tolerance? How does the ideal of a ‘value free’ secular education mask the values that the secular state teaches? The essays are written from both theoretical and practical perspectives and engage with each other directly to address one of the significant issues of our day. This is the fourth volume arising from a series of conferences on the theme of ‘Negotiating the Sacred’. Previous volumes have included /Blasphemy and Sacrilege in a Multicultural Society; Blasphemy and Sacrilege in the Arts; and Medicine, Religion and the Body.

Education -- Religious aspects. --- Moral education -- Study and teaching. --- Private schools -- Religion. --- Religion in the public schools -- Study and teaching. --- Religious tolerance -- Study and teaching. --- Toleration -- Study and teaching. --- Church and education. --- Religion in the public schools. --- Education --- Religious tolerance. --- Religious aspects. --- Tolerance, Religious --- Children --- Education, Primitive --- Education of children --- Human resource development --- Instruction --- Pedagogy --- Schooling --- Students --- Youth --- Bible in the schools --- Education and church --- Education. --- Religion and Education. --- Toleration --- Civilization --- Learning and scholarship --- Mental discipline --- Schools --- Teaching --- Training --- Church and education --- Church and state --- Public schools --- Religious education --- Religious education of children --- Religion and education.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Religious studies --- Didactics of religion --- godsdienst

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Blasphemy and other forms of blatant disrespect to religious beliefs have the capacity to create significant civil and even international unrest. Consequently, the sacrosanctity of religious dogmas and beliefs, stringent laws of repression and codes of moral and ethical propriety have compelled artists to live and create with occupational hazards like uncertain audience response, self-censorship and accusations of deliberate misinterpretation of cultural production looming over their heads. Yet, in recent years, issues surrounding the rights of minority cultures to recognition and respect have raised new questions about the contemporariness of the construct of blasphemy and sacrilege. Controversies over the aesthetic representation of the sacred, the exhibition of the sacred as art, and the public display of sacrilegious or blasphemous works have given rise to heated debates and have invited us to reflect on binaries like artistic and religious sensibilities, tolerance and philistinism, the sacred and the profane, deification and vilification. Endeavouring to move beyond ‘simplistic’ points about the rights to freedom of expression and sacrosanctity, this collection explores how differences between conceptions of the sacred can be negotiated. It recognises that blasphemy may be justified as a form of political criticism, as well as a sincere expression of spirituality. But it also recognises that within a pluralistic society, blasphemy in the arts can do an enormous amount of harm, as it may also impair relations within and between societies. This collection evolved out a two-day conference called ‘Negotiating the Sacred: Blasphemy and Sacrilege in the Arts’ held at the Centre for Cross Cultural Research at The Australian National University in November 2005. This is the second volume in a series of five conferences and edited collections on the theme ‘Negotiating the Sacred’. The first conference, ‘Negotiating the Sacred: Blasphemy and Sacrilege in a Multicultural Society’ was held at The Australian National University’s Centre for Cross-Cultural Research in 2004, and published as an edited collection by ANU E Press in 2006. Other conferences in the series have included Religion, Medicine and the Body (ANU, 2006), Tolerance, Education and the Curriculum (ANU, 2007), and Governing the Family (Monash University, 2008). Together, the series represents a major contribution to ongoing debates on the political demands arising from religious pluralism in multicultural societies.

Art, Architecture & Applied Arts --- Fine Arts - General --- Arts and religion. --- Offenses against religion. --- Blasphemy. --- Crimes against religion --- Offenses, Religious --- Religious crimes --- Religious offenses --- Arts --- Religion and the arts --- Religious aspects --- Freedom of speech --- Libel and slander --- Offenses against religion --- Crime --- Religion --- Sacrilege. --- Church desecration --- Desecration --- Host desecration accusation --- Taboo

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Art