Listing 1 - 10 of 30 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
As countries strive for a strong recovery and to recoup the losses incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, they need to map out a new path for development and high and sustained growth. Promoting diversification, developing new industrial capabilities, and designing the policies needed to achieve this goal should be a priority. A successful diversification strategy should tackle both broad policy failures, such as an unfavorable business environment and investment climate and sector-specific market failures. This departmental paper presents a conceptual framework to analyze industrial policy, defined as targeted sectoral interventions. The authors first discuss the key principles that should guide policymakers, that is, a focus on the market failures that could justify targeted sectoral interventions, as well as the potential government failures that can undermine these interventions. The authors then discuss some commonly employed policy tools, their rationale, and the associated pitfalls. Finally, the authors outline a stylized decision-making framework.
Choose an application
We study how macroeconomic shocks affect U.S. public debt dynamics using a VAR with debt feedback. Following a fiscal austerity shock, the debt ratio initially declines and then returns to its pre-shock path. Yet, the effect is not statistically significant. In a weak economic environment, the likelihood of a self-defeating austerity shock is much higher than in normal times. An inflation shock only slightly reduces the debt ratio for a few quarters. A positive growth shock unambiguously lowers debt. In our specification, the debt ratio is stationary, whereas a VAR excluding debt may imply an explosive debt path.
Political Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Public Finance --- Debts, Public. --- Inflation (Finance) --- Debts, Government --- Government debts --- National debts --- Public debt --- Public debts --- Sovereign debt --- Finance --- Natural rate of unemployment --- Debt --- Bonds --- Deficit financing --- Debts, Public --- Fiscal policy --- Econometric models --- E-books --- Tax policy --- Taxation --- Economic policy --- Finance, Public --- Government policy --- Econometrics --- Exports and Imports --- Inflation --- Macroeconomics --- National Budget, Deficit, and Debt: General --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Fiscal Policy --- Time-Series Models --- Dynamic Quantile Regressions --- Dynamic Treatment Effect Models --- Diffusion Processes --- State Space Models --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Public finance & taxation --- International economics --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Debt sustainability analysis --- Vector autoregression --- Fiscal stance --- Prices --- External debt --- Econometric analysis --- Debts, External --- United States
Choose an application
The paper presents evidence that the contribution of differences in total factor productivity (TFP) to income differences across countries steadily increased between 1970 and 2000. We verify that our finding is neither imputable to measurement errors in input factors nor dependent on the assumption of factor neutral differences in technology. We conclude that theories explaining cross-country income differences based on institutions or on forces that are constant over time, such as geography or legal origin, should be reconsidered in the light of their consistency with the rise of the explanatory power of TFP.
Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Production and Operations Management --- Production --- Cost --- Capital and Total Factor Productivity --- Capacity --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Accounting --- Employment --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Human Capital --- Skills --- Occupational Choice --- Labor Productivity --- Economic growth --- Labour --- income economics --- Total factor productivity --- Personal income --- Growth accounting --- Capital productivity --- Human capital --- Industrial productivity --- Income --- Economic development --- United States --- Income economics
Choose an application
Only a few European economies and Korea and Taiwan Province of China reached high-income status during 1970-2010. Malaysia’s real income per capita increased to 26 percent of the U.S. level in 2010 from 20 percent in 1970. Despite relatively strong growth and a substantial improvement in export sophistication, Malaysia’s total factor productivity lagged behind that of Korea and Taiwan Province of China. We argue that what characterizes their experience in contrast to Malaysia’s is the creation of technologies by domestic firms and a push to leapfrog to the technological frontier at an early stage of development.
Economic development -- Malaysia. --- Economic development. --- Exports -- Malaysia. --- Industrial productivity -- Malaysia. --- Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Industries: Manufacturing --- Production and Operations Management --- Industrialization --- Manufacturing and Service Industries --- Choice of Technology --- Industrial Policy --- Technological Change: Government Policy --- Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity: General --- Economywide Country Studies: Asia including Middle East --- Trade: General --- Innovation --- Research and Development --- Technological Change --- Intellectual Property Rights: General --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Industry Studies: Manufacturing: General --- International economics --- Technology --- general issues --- Manufacturing industries --- Exports --- Productivity --- Income --- Manufacturing --- International trade --- Production --- National accounts --- Economic sectors --- Industrial productivity --- Taiwan Province of China --- General issues
Choose an application
Industrial policy is tainted with bad reputation among policymakers and academics and is often viewed as the road to perdition for developing economies. Yet the success of the Asian Miracles with industrial policy stands as an uncomfortable story that many ignore or claim it cannot be replicated. Using a theory and empirical evidence, we argue that one can learn more from miracles than failures. We suggest three key principles behind their success: (i) the support of domestic producers in sophisticated industries, beyond the initial comparative advantage; (ii) export orientation; and (iii) the pursuit of fierce competition with strict accountability.
Industrial policy. --- Business --- Industries --- Industry and state --- Economic policy --- Government policy --- Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Industries: Manufacturing --- Production and Operations Management --- Industrial Policy --- Measurement of Economic Growth --- Aggregate Productivity --- Cross-Country Output Convergence --- Comparative Studies of Countries --- Trade: General --- Industry Studies: Manufacturing: General --- Neoclassical Models of Trade --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- International economics --- Manufacturing industries --- Exports --- Manufacturing --- Comparative advantage --- Productivity --- Income --- International trade --- Economic sectors --- Production --- National accounts --- Industrial productivity --- Korea, Republic of
Choose an application
A universal testing and isolation policy is the most viable way to vanquish a pandemic. Its implementation requires: (i) an epidemiological rather than clinical approach to testing, sacrificing accuracy for scalability, convenience and speed; and (ii) state intervention to ramp up production, similar to True Industrial Policy (TIP), on a global level to achieve a scale and speed the market alone would fail to provide. We sketch a strategy to tackle market failures and implement smart testing, especially in densely populated areas. The estimated cost of testing is dwarfed by its return, mitigating the economic fallout of the pandemic.
Financial Risk Management --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Demography --- Diseases: Contagious --- Industrial Policy --- Demographic Economics: General --- Health: General --- Financing Policy --- Financial Risk and Risk Management --- Capital and Ownership Structure --- Value of Firms --- Goodwill --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Labor Economics: General --- Health Behavior --- Population & demography --- Health economics --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Public finance & taxation --- Labour --- income economics --- Infectious & contagious diseases --- Population and demographics --- Health --- Early warning systems --- Public expenditure review --- Labor --- Financial crises --- Expenditure --- COVID-19 --- Population --- Crisis management --- Expenditures, Public --- Labor economics --- Communicable diseases --- United States
Choose an application
A universal testing and isolation policy is the most viable way to vanquish a pandemic. Its implementation requires: (i) an epidemiological rather than clinical approach to testing, sacrificing accuracy for scalability, convenience and speed; and (ii) state intervention to ramp up production, similar to True Industrial Policy (TIP), on a global level to achieve a scale and speed the market alone would fail to provide. We sketch a strategy to tackle market failures and implement smart testing, especially in densely populated areas. The estimated cost of testing is dwarfed by its return, mitigating the economic fallout of the pandemic.
United States --- Financial Risk Management --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Demography --- Diseases: Contagious --- Industrial Policy --- Demographic Economics: General --- Health: General --- Financing Policy --- Financial Risk and Risk Management --- Capital and Ownership Structure --- Value of Firms --- Goodwill --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Labor Economics: General --- Health Behavior --- Population & demography --- Health economics --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Public finance & taxation --- Labour --- income economics --- Infectious & contagious diseases --- Population and demographics --- Health --- Early warning systems --- Public expenditure review --- Labor --- Financial crises --- Expenditure --- COVID-19 --- Population --- Crisis management --- Expenditures, Public --- Labor economics --- Communicable diseases --- Covid-19 --- Income economics
Choose an application
The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy.
Choose an application
Industrial policies pursued in many developing countries in the 1950s-1970s largely failed while the industrial policies of the Asian Miracles succeeded. We argue that a key factor of success is industrial policy with export orientation in contrast to import substitution. Exporting encouraged competition, economies of scale, innovation, and local integration and provided market signals to policymakers. Even in a large market such as India, import substitution policies in the automotive industry failed because of micromanagement and misaligned incentives. We also analyze the risk tradeoffs involved in various industrial policy strategies and their implications on the 21st century industrial policies. While state interventions may be needed to develop some new capabilities and industries, trade protectionism is neither a necessary nor a sufficient tool and will most likely be counterproductive.
Aggregate Productivity --- Comparative Studies of Countries --- Competition --- Cross-Country Output Convergence --- Currency crises --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economic sectors --- Economics of specific sectors --- Economics --- Economics: General --- Exports and Imports --- Exports --- Finance --- Finance: General --- Financial markets --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Imports --- Industrial Policy --- Industries: Manufacturing --- Industry Studies: Manufacturing: General --- Informal sector --- International economics --- International Trade Organizations --- International trade --- Macroeconomics --- Manufacturing industries --- Manufacturing --- Measurement of Economic Growth --- Public finance & taxation --- Tariff --- Tariffs --- Taxation --- Taxes --- Trade Policy --- Trade: General
Choose an application
We study the effects of permanent and temporary income shocks on precautionary saving and investment in a "store-or-sow" model of growth. High volatility of permanent shocks results in high precautionary saving in the safe asset and low investment, or a "volatility trap." Namely, big savers invest relatively little. In contrast, low volatility of permanent shocks leads to low precautionary saving and high or low investment, depending on the volatility of temporary shocks. Empirical evidence shows a nonlinear relationship between investment and saving and that investment is a hump-shaped function of the volatility of permanent shocks, as predicted by the model.
Business & Economics --- Economic Theory --- Risk. --- Saving and investment. --- Accumulation, Capital --- Capital accumulation --- Capital formation --- Investment and saving --- Saving and thrift --- Capital --- Supply-side economics --- Wealth --- Investments --- Economics --- Uncertainty --- Probabilities --- Profit --- Risk-return relationships --- Investments: Commodities --- Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Investment --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Intertemporal Consumer Choice --- Life Cycle Models and Saving --- Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity: General --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Current Account Adjustment --- Short-term Capital Movements --- Agriculture: General --- International economics --- Investment & securities --- Precautionary savings --- Income --- Income shocks --- Current account surpluses --- Agricultural commodities --- National accounts --- Balance of payments --- Commodities --- Saving and investment --- Farm produce --- United States
Listing 1 - 10 of 30 | << page >> |
Sort by
|