Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The world is facing several serious challenges at the close of the fossil and nuclear energy regime: the limited resources of cheap conventional oil can only be surmounted by tapping unconventional oil reserves, e.g. deep sea oil. The explosion of the oil platform Deepwater Horizon in 2010 and the subsequent oil spill caused enormous damage, which even a year later cannot be fully estimated. Another even more important threat emanating from the fossil and nuclear energy regime has been brought to our attention by the Fukushima disaster. Last but not least, the problem of climate change caused by an increase in greenhouse gas emissions is looming, despite the fact that the international community has agreed on a considerable reduction of these emissions. Is this poor result of the Kyoto Protocol and the failure of successive climate conferences the consequence of a preference for the use of market-based instruments? The majority of climate scientists, economists, and politicians believe in the efficiency of cap-and-trade  regulations. They even conceive them as a constituent ingredient of a Green New Deal  or Global Green Recovery . The contributions in this volume provide a critical examination of the theoretical foundations, the political implications, and the empirical experiences of the application of market mechanisms and financial instruments to climate policy.

Social sciences (general) --- Politics --- politiek --- sociale wetenschappen

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The world is facing several serious challenges at the close of the fossil and nuclear energy regime: the limited resources of cheap conventional oil can only be surmounted by tapping unconventional oil reserves, e.g. deep sea oil. The explosion of the oil platform Deepwater Horizon in 2010 and the subsequent oil spill caused enormous damage, which even a year later cannot be fully estimated. Another even more important threat emanating from the fossil and nuclear energy regime has been brought to our attention by the Fukushima disaster. Last but not least, the problem of climate change caused by an increase in greenhouse gas emissions is looming, despite the fact that the international community has agreed on a considerable reduction of these emissions. Is this poor result of the Kyoto Protocol and the failure of successive climate conferences the consequence of a preference for the use of market-based instruments? The majority of climate scientists, economists, and politicians believe in the efficiency of cap-and-trade  regulations. They even conceive them as a constituent ingredient of a Green New Deal  or Global Green Recovery . The contributions in this volume provide a critical examination of the theoretical foundations, the political implications, and the empirical experiences of the application of market mechanisms and financial instruments to climate policy.

Social sciences (general) --- Politics --- politiek --- sociale wetenschappen

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Wie sieht der Verkehr von heute und die Mobilität von morgen aus? Elektroautos sind auf dem Vormarsch und werden für viele Verkehrsprobleme als zentrale Lösung angepriesen. Allerdings greift dieser Wechsel der Antriebstechnologie zu kurz, denn er bringt neue soziale und ökologische Probleme für die Rohstoffpolitik und die globale Wertschöpfungskette mit sich. Aber auch Mobilitätskonzepte wie Carsharing, Ridepooling oder autonomes Fahren werfen viele Fragen auf und sind verknüpft mit gesellschaftlichen Konflikten. Die aus verschiedenen Disziplinen kommenden Autor*innen beschäftigen sich mit diesen hochaktuellen Entwicklungen und liefern Orientierung in der Auseinandersetzung mit der Transformation und Zukunft der (Auto-)Mobilität. »Ein sehr informativer Band, der viele Argumente bereithält, die Interessierte und KritikerInnen der E-Mobilität im Rahmen der Verkehrswende gut nutzen können.« Herbert Klemisch, Contraste, 11 (2020) Besprochen in: Luxemburg, 7 (2020) www.heise.de, 02.08.2020, Timo Daum Der Rabe Ralf, 12 (2020), Herbert Klemisch

Argentina. --- Argentinien. --- Automobile Industry. --- Automobilindustrie. --- Autonomes Fahren. --- Bewegung. --- Bolivia. --- Bolivien. --- Chile. --- China. --- Climate Change. --- Climate Protection. --- Economy. --- Electromobility. --- Elektromobilität. --- Environmental Policy. --- Environmental Sociology. --- Gesellschaft. --- Global South. --- Globaler Süden. --- Globalisierung. --- Globalization. --- Greenwashing. --- IG Metall. --- Ig Metall. --- Klimaschutz. --- Klimawandel. --- Mobility Concepts. --- Mobilitätskonzepte. --- Movement. --- Political Science. --- Politics. --- Politik. --- Politikwissenschaft. --- Raw Material Governance. --- Raw Materials Policy. --- Rohstoffgovernance. --- Rohstoffpolitik. --- Society. --- Sociology of Technology. --- Techniksoziologie. --- Transformation of Transport. --- Transformation. --- Umweltpolitik. --- Umweltsoziologie. --- Value Chains. --- Verkehrswende. --- Wertschöpfungsketten. --- Wirtschaft. --- POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Environmental Policy. --- Auto; Elektromobilität; Transformation; Rohstoffpolitik; Wertschöpfungsketten; Verkehrswende; Bewegung; Autonomes Fahren; Klimaschutz; Klimawandel; China; Mobilitätskonzepte; Globalisierung; Rohstoffgovernance; Globaler Süden; Greenwashing; Automobilindustrie; IG Metall; Argentinien; Chile; Bolivien; Politik; Gesellschaft; Wirtschaft; Umweltpolitik; Umweltsoziologie; Techniksoziologie; Politikwissenschaft; Car; Electromobility; Raw Materials Policy; Value Chains; Transformation of Transport; Movement; Climate Protection; Climate Change; Mobility Concepts; Globalization; Raw Material Governance; Global South; Automobile Industry; Ig Metall; Argentina; Bolivia; Politics; Society; Economy; Environmental Policy; Environmental Sociology; Sociology of Technology; Political Science

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This volume examines the national plans that ten Euratom countries plus Switzerland and the United States are developing to address high-level radioactive waste storage and disposal. The chapters, which were written by 23 international experts, outline European and national regulations, technology choices, safety criteria, monitoring systems, compensation schemes, institutional structures, and approaches to public involvement. Key stakeholders, their values and interests are introduced, the responsibilities and authority of different actors considered, decision-making processes are analyzed as well as the factors influencing different national policy choices. The views and expectations of different communities regarding participatory decision making and compensation and the steps that have been or are being taken to promote dialogue and constructive problem-solving are also considered. Contents The International Dimension Countries with Geological Disposal after Reprocessing Nuclear Fuel Countries with Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel Countries with Long-Term Surface Storage for High Level Radioactive Waste Target Groups Energy (policy) experts; nuclear energy experts and practitioners, political and social scientists, economists, engineers; decision makers and consultants, civil society organizations The Editors Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Ana María Isidoro Losada, Lutz Mez and Miranda Schreurs; Environmental Policy Research Centre, Freie Universität Berlin and members of the project “Multi-level Governance Perspective on Nuclear Waste Disposal” within the research platform ENTRIA.

Energy. --- Energy Policy, Economics and Management. --- Comparative Politics. --- Nuclear Energy. --- Business & Economics --- Industries --- Radioactive waste disposal. --- Radioactive waste sites. --- Radioactive wastes --- Nuclear industry --- Radioactive waste sites --- Nuclear facilities --- Storage. --- Waste disposal. --- Location. --- Atomic facilities --- Facilities, Nuclear --- Nuclear installations --- Dumping sites, Radioactive --- Radioactive dumping sites --- Radioactive waste disposal sites --- Radioactive waste facilities --- Atomic energy industries --- Atomic industry --- Atomic power industry --- Nuclear energy industry --- Nuclear power industry --- Nuclear waste disposal --- Energy policy. --- Energy and state. --- Nuclear energy. --- Comparative politics. --- Nuclear energy --- Nuclear engineering --- Hazardous waste sites --- Energy industries --- Radioactivity --- Refuse and refuse disposal --- Radioactive pollution --- Safety measures --- Comparative political systems --- Comparative politics --- Government, Comparative --- Political systems, Comparative --- Political science --- Atomic energy --- Atomic power --- Energy, Atomic --- Energy, Nuclear --- Nuclear power --- Power, Atomic --- Power, Nuclear --- Force and energy --- Nuclear physics --- Power resources --- Nuclear power plants --- Energy and state --- State and energy --- Industrial policy --- Energy conservation --- Government policy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This is volume two of a comparative analysis of nuclear waste governance and public participation in decision-making regarding the storage and siting of high-level radioactive waste and spent fuel in different countries. The contributors examine both the historical and current approaches countries have taken to address the wicked challenge of nuclear waste governance. The analyses discuss the regulations, technology choices, safety criteria, costs and financing issues, compensation schemes, institutional structures, and approaches to public participation found in each country. Contents Technical, Political, and Socio-Economic Challenges of Nuclear Waste Governance “The Big 4” – China, Russia, South Korea and Japan The Eastern European Countries Nuclear Waste Governance in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, and South Africa Target Groups Energy (policy) experts, nuclear energy experts and practitioners, political and social scientists, economists, engineers, decision makers and consultants, civil society organizations The Editors Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Ana María Isidoro Losada, Lutz Mez, Environmental Policy Research Centre, Freie Universität Berlin, and Miranda A. Schreurs, Bavarian School of Public Policy, Technical University of Munich, were members of the project “Multi Level Governance-Perspective on Nuclear Waste Disposal” within the research platform ENTRIA (2013-2017).

Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Sociology of policy --- Political systems --- Relation between energy and economics --- Environmental protection. Environmental technology --- energiebeheer (technologie) --- energiemanagement (economie) --- energiebeleid --- energie-economie --- politiek --- milieubeleid --- kernenergie --- milieupolitiek